|
|
PAK
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1324
|
 Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:04 pm
|
 |
|
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2793
Did ULF weapon research at Augsberg College cause the bridge collapse in Minneapolis?
"Reports from Russia’s Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics
located in Irkutsk are reporting today that their Siberian Solar Radio Telescope(SSRT) detected a ‘massive’ ultra low frequency (ULF) ‘blast’ emanating from Latitude: 45° 00' North Longitude: 93° 15' West at the ‘exact’ moment, and location, of a catastrophic collapse of a nearly 2,000 foot long bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota."
...
"These reports further state that one of the United States primary research organizations into acoustic weapons research is Augsburg College, and which is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and most importantly less
than 1 mile from the Interstate 35W Bridge collapse.
To the exact reason of why, and what exactly happened in this catastrophe we can only speculate, but, with what is known about the United States past history of using sophisticated weapons on their own citizens for ‘research’ purposes it certainly lies in the realm of possibility that this horrific tragedy is rooted in the use of ULF weapons."
Here's a link to a video from CNN on the collapse. It is unreal. It does not look possible that this was just some structural failure I don't care what the "experts" say. Wish I could enlarge this video somehow.
http://www.kare11.com/video/player.aspx?aid=51385&bw=
_________________
... we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. Aldous Huxley |
| |
|
|
marklookingup
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 502
|
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:32 pm
|
|
|
I wonder if this technology was used to initiate the WTC collapses? |
| |
|
|
No Way Oligarchs
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Location: Entropia, South-west England |
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:33 pm
|
|
|
Not sure whether to react with  or 
Why? Well Russia are doing remarkably well in the propaganda war of late aren't they? Could be a factor.
_________________
Parsons used the lavatory, loudly and abundantly. It then turned out that the plug was defective and the cell stank abominably for hours afterwards. George Orwell. 1984. |
| |
|
|
No Way Oligarchs
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Location: Entropia, South-west England |
| T'was explosions. Explosions I tell 'ya
Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:40 pm
|
|
|
Marklookingup said:
quote:
I wonder if this technology was used to initiate the WTC collapses?
Not likely IMO.
Upward trajectory of explosions (WTC 1&2).
Movement outwards in all directions.
Pools of molten metal for weeks
Check out this post. track down the video and get a reward! It's true!
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread12353.html
_________________
Parsons used the lavatory, loudly and abundantly. It then turned out that the plug was defective and the cell stank abominably for hours afterwards. George Orwell. 1984. |
| |
|
|
No Way Oligarchs
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Location: Entropia, South-west England |
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:49 pm
|
|
|
Hold on a minute. Surely a collapsing bridge MUST generate a detectable ULF burst of exactly one cycle as it whacks the ground?
_________________
Parsons used the lavatory, loudly and abundantly. It then turned out that the plug was defective and the cell stank abominably for hours afterwards. George Orwell. 1984. |
| |
|
|
PAK
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1324
|
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:02 pm
|
|
|
I watched the videos about WTC building. These are very diabolical creatures who could have a building erected with explosives already in them.
Just watching the video of the bridge - something is not natural about the way it collapsed, but I'm no engineer.
Of course, I don't believe the Russians are behind this anymore than the US is behind WTC. But, definitely, an Elite group, working globally now, to wreak havoc and chaos everywhere, get everyone going in circles accusing each other. No one country could be spraying the skies on the global scale we are all witnessing.
Too bad no one can find that PBS documentary.
_________________
... we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. Aldous Huxley |
| |
|
|
No Way Oligarchs
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Location: Entropia, South-west England |
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:00 pm
|
|
|
Pak said:
quote:
I watched the videos about WTC building. These are very diabolical creatures who could have a building erected with explosives already in them.
Ah, maybe not. At least two alternative justifications exist besides incorrigible satanism 
1. Cold War thinking. Better to destroy symbolic financial centre than lose control of it.
2. Cost of eventual demolition
Regarding the second point, the explosives would have been totally inert until used. Risk is negligible. Cost of installation during construction very low compared to later. Furthermore this was not a precedent. Have not checked evidence of this being done during the construction of other big or strategic or otherwise important buildings myself, but I have been led to believe that the technique was used in buildings both prior to and since the construction of WTC1 & 2.
Interesting parallel with cars (maybe). Look at Empire State Building, look at car of same year. Big, heavy, built to last forever. Empire State gets hit by a 2WW bomber? T'is merely a scratch. By the late 60s everything had a life cycle, which really meant everything started to be built to fail simply because there was more profit in it. Economics - the dismal science! I shared a house with an architect at uni. I remember him talking about building life-cycles, though not exactly in the way outlined here.
So, just for a moment, accept the above. There you are, with your lovely big towers with stupid windows, inconvenient corridors and lifts, semi-permanently empty letting space and oh-so-much asbestos fire cladding. The building is a white elephant. It sucks. How the hell are we going to get rid of this thing without being sued by everyone and their dog or re-homing Manhattan for six months?
I wonder...
("HOW much insurance Larry?" )
quote:
"Just watching the video of the bridge - something is not natural about the way it collapsed, but I'm no engineer."
What I saw of the reports of the structural surveys done prior to the collapse seemed to be saying that the bridge was in pretty crap order. I mean, cracks, bends and corrosion?
So there you are, with your aesthetically obnoxious, rotten old bridge...
quote:
Too bad no one can find that PBS documentary.
Yes isn't it? It'll come though - and when it does EVERYTHING changes.[/i]
_________________
Parsons used the lavatory, loudly and abundantly. It then turned out that the plug was defective and the cell stank abominably for hours afterwards. George Orwell. 1984. |
| |
|
|
BrassRat
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 133
Location: Gulf Breeze, Florida |
| Bridge
Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:28 pm
|
|
|
I watched the video of the collapse. What were the wind characteristics at that moment? The wind sock or flag shown in the video is interesting to watch especially in relationship to the dust cloud generated in the collapse. Are we seeing an indicator which may be relevant to the suggestion of a ULF weapon? |
| |
|
|
No Way Oligarchs
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Location: Entropia, South-west England |
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:12 pm
|
|
|
No. The dust cloud is simply the result of the air underneath the bridge making way for the falling masonry. Airsock suggests wind was light, hence not a factor.
IMO of course. ULF attack is more exciting answer but I don't think it'll turn out to be true.
My respects to the dead and their families. 
_________________
Parsons used the lavatory, loudly and abundantly. It then turned out that the plug was defective and the cell stank abominably for hours afterwards. George Orwell. 1984. |
| |
|
|
PAK
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1324
|
|
Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:51 am
|
|
|
quote:
Ah, maybe not. At least two alternative justifications exist besides incorrigible satanism
1. Cold War thinking. Better to destroy symbolic financial centre than lose control of it.
2. Cost of eventual demolition
I don't agree. Although I do believe things today are not made to last as they did say 50-100 years ago. I think that is to keep people frustrated, constantly buying and enabling people to accept new technology at a quicker pace.
The Twin Towers were not demolished for monetary purposes alone as the bankers don't need money - they have all they can print. Larry just got an extra bonus is all.
Also, the demolition was an awesome sight, played over and over again to burn it into the imaginations of the people. This was definitely occult, as I do believe the Elite are into the occult, but it is not devil worship as say Christians think of it. That's just more hollywood hype, but just like the Pharoahs of Egypt, and the Persian magi, these people do have their own secret religion, and it ain't very nice. The Twin Towers were to mark the beginning of their new age, the symbolic destruction of America, and the elimination of the male/female as the twins Jachim and Boaz will be replaced with a single skyscraper, phallic symbol of power.
As for the bridge, well we won't know the whole truth and nothing but the truth for who knows how long, if we ever will. But, I do not think it was an accident, as it fits precisely in with their plan to keep up the constant fear and terror. Now we have to be afraid of traveling on bridges in America, after all, most are in disrepair according to the report. So now, we have to basically strip to get on an airplane, terrorists could be hiding anywhere, the war is a disastor, we have wicked weather all over (droughts, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc.), we have hoards of people coming over the borders including gangs like MI3 (kind of British sounding), the stock market is up and down like a yo yo, taxes only go up along with utilities and higher education, the dollar continues to take a dive, we have no idea what food is good to eat anymore, and 1 out of 2 of us is gonna get cancer. I mean, how much more stress can we continue to absorb? And in between we find out Britany Spears is a lousy mother!
This is all about power and control.
Personally I think the Brits are behind it all = Prince Charles was right here after Katrina, surveying his new beach front property, just chomping at the bit.
_________________
... we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. Aldous Huxley |
| |
|
|
pirate118
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 86
|
|
Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:20 am
|
|
|
I must admit, when watching the video of the collapse, I was somewhat stunned to watch it appear to just all fall at once. I, personally, would have guessed a portion would fail then the rest to follow suit. It just seemed to drop. I think I said out loud "%$@#, it all just dropped, wtf?"
I remember the initial comments included people feeling the sensation of a "jack hammer". Seems odd to me, the sensation of a "shudder" feeling of a potential collapse like that , I figured, would not be described as such. Maybe a bit more intense and violent. I've been around jack hammers, it is a uniform feeling, rhythmic , violent to the operator, but a smooth tempo radiates outward. I guessed the vibrtation of a collapse like that would be all over the map, not what someone could equate to a rhythm. I guess I thought the feeling would be more like shaking a bed or something like that.
Then again, I could be thinking too outside the box.
pirate |
| |
|
|
myrrh
Joined: 14 Mar 2002
Posts: 106
Location: Eastern Central Indiana |
| A bridge conspiracy theory:
Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:15 pm
|
|
|
Captain Eric May, a former Army intelligence officer and public affairs officer, has written an article in which he puts forth the following theory about the bridge collapse:
[b]"A Minnesota Miracle"
[color=black]Wednesday afternoon could have added even more woes to the White House. America's first and only Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison, appeared on CNN's Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer to discuss some scorching anti-Bush comments he had made on July 8 to constituents in Minneapolis, in which he had compared 9/11 to the Reichstag Fire, and George Bush to Adolph Hitler. In 1933 Hitler used the Reichstag Fire, carried out under his orders, to establish a dictatorship in Germany.
Ellison's analysis is accepted by most of the Muslim world, much of the non-Muslim world, and a growing minority of Americans. Rather than defend it, though, Ellison backed down with apologies in his interview with Blitzer, saying that his remarks were a "rookie mistake," never to be repeated.
Perhaps Ellison's retreat from his remarks was an attempt to stave off the disaster that frequently befalls those who disrupt the political paradigm. If so, it didn't work. [color=red]Two hours after Ellison's mea culpa, his congressional district suffered a freak disaster with the collapse of the I-35 bridge into the Mississippi River.
One man's loss is another's gain, though. In the news, the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge supplanted the collapse of the al-Maliki government and the Bush White House for the rest of Wednesday..., then Thursday..., then Friday. By Saturday the congressman who had accused the unitary executive of treason was with Bush himself, taking a tour of his afflicted district, and begging for the relief of federal funds.
www.rense.com/general77/dawn.htm |
| |
|
|
No Way Oligarchs
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Location: Entropia, South-west England |
| Three replies...
Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:54 pm
|
|
|
Pak. While I think your claim that "the Brits are behind it" is a bit tenuous, I don't actually see anything else you said in your last that is in any way at odds with what I said. Why can't it ALL be true, or at the very least possible? My research suggests that most "events" are multi-functional. We can assume by now that seeking to kill two or more birds with each stone is the norm. Don't you agree? 
pirate118. Jack hammers eh? Now isn't that interesting? Is this possibly confirmation that I was right about the Russian news being propaganda? Jack hammers are not the same as a sharp burst of ULF.
Myrrh. Captain May... Hmm... Now, I'm only putting this out there, you understand, but five years ago Capt. May looked like he was going to make a huge difference. Then he sort of went quiet (at least, I didn't seem to come across any new stuff by him). Now he pops up with this. Looking at what he says, I'd assume that everything could be verified, in which case, wow! On the other hand, what if he didn't actually stop working for military intelligence at all? He could easily be a protagonist who lures a bunch of hotheads into doing something stupid. Just a thought.
_________________
Parsons used the lavatory, loudly and abundantly. It then turned out that the plug was defective and the cell stank abominably for hours afterwards. George Orwell. 1984. |
| |
|
|
pirate118
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 86
|
|
Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:10 pm
|
|
|
No intent to sound like a dumb ass, just curious, what would the "feeling" of a ULF burst of that possible scale " feel like"? Maybe my interpretation of ULF is a bit off.
As a note, those comments came from people that I'm not real sure of their location when the collapse happened, in a car, nearby, not sure. It did catch my ear though. Haven't heard about it ( those descriptions) since that first day though.
I have watched the video more and do now see that one end did start the collapse, but still the entire structure gave as almost one unit. Too bad another view has not surfaced since the initial failure is out of view.
Now a new repost states the construction workers felt the bridge "wobbling" for a few days prior to the collapse.
pirate |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
