|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
Shameful behavior
Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:30 pm
|
|
|
It's really a shame, it really is.
The last flames of a free society are flickering and this site continues to argue over nonsense things like a persons screen name.
We are losing our country, our freedoms our individuality and our most important document, our Constitution and the rights it provides and still you continue to argue, ban members and ignore real issues.
We need to band together and defeat the takeover of our country by traitors like Bush and Cheney. Have you looked at the sky lately and seen the new increased spraying operations in progress, the banning of news items, the banning of certain songs/ artists on the radio, the taking away of your right to make decisions. And now the talk of restricted travel within the U.S. by it's citizens. It's much later than you might think.
David |
| |
|
|
starman1
Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 1487
Location: Earth |
Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:04 am
|
|
|
Hello David,
I sent you a PM. |
| |
|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
?
Sat Dec 01, 2007 3:14 am
|
|
|
What did the PM say? Who's screen name are we argueing over? What is this restricted travel you speak of? _________________ “To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
cipher
Joined: 04 Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Location: texas |
Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:32 am
|
|
|
man it certainly has taken a turn for the worse here in n.texas...iv been observing our friends in the sky for 8 maybe 9 years..and this massive display is by far the greatest amount of activity....AND NOT 1 AGAIN I SAY NOT ONE PERSON I KNOW CARES,OR EVEN BOTHERS TO LOOK..it truly is a culture falling fast...... _________________ above the sheep |
| |
|
|
starman1
Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 1487
Location: Earth |
Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:43 pm
|
|
|
PI, it was just a reply to this part of his post,
quote: our Constitution and the rights it provides and still you continue to argue, ban members and ignore real issues.
I chose not to respond in the public forum, but if you are asking him what the PM said I have no problem with him posting it here, I just don't wish to further the agenda of some of those who were recently banned here and it is no secret. |
| |
|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
Cool
Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:57 pm
|
|
|
Sorry, that piqued my interest. I should learn not to do that. _________________ “To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
mr. jones

Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 1899
|
Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:07 pm
|
|
|
"We are losing our country"quote.
it was officially lost when the federal reserve act was passed in congress, during christmas with two miserly votes. _________________ "The whole aim of practical politics is
to keep the populace alarmed, and thus clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of
hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." |
| |
|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
?
Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:17 pm
|
|
|
Just then?
I always assumed it happened when they executed Kennedy and the military industrial complex came into power, no longer feeling a need to pretend. _________________ “To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
Vid
Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:02 pm
|
|
|
Mark:
Yes. I watched the entire series over the course of a week about a year back. I posted it here somewhere, we had a really good discussion about this. _________________ “To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:49 pm
|
|
|
Starman your PM to me is below in bold. You took it as a personal affront and seem to have misread the post, please reread. Where did I attack your person? Where is it I talked about hiding anything? Nobody has told me anything, I read here on a near daily basis and have followed the conficts.
I did not attack you,not once did I do so, you however have attacked me via your PM. Again starman, my post was for the general board and did not target you, your reading comprehension skills are poor.
For your education and to clarify: my post was meant to say this. Don't fiddle why Rome burns, argueing will not solve the problems in our country and society. Argueing on the board will get nothing done. My post was meant for the general population of the board and targeted no one person.
Myself and several others left Marks board because of all the infighting and argueing. I can't speak for the others but as for myself I have all but given up on these boards and rarely post. I do however remain more active in the public. I write letters, make phone calls, send emails and photos,(of chemtrails and planes and the results of same) call my congressman at his office and confront him here locally where he spends his recreation time. This is the action that is needed, not argueing and fighting among yourselves.
David
Hello david,
I read your thread in the forum, and decided to respond here.
Moderating here is not an easy job, and there have been those who have been deliberatly misleading other's and creating divisional infighting. If you have some insightful way to move things forward I appreciate your leadership, but please don't come in here and critisize the efforts I am making to try and keep the peace, without knowing what all has been transpiring here. These members who were recently banned were banned because of forum disruption, they have been spreading this crap all over the related web sites and I have stopped it here. No one is attempting to hide any truth from anyone, and I really resent your accusation. Lead on if you want, but be here regularly to keep things moving forward, don't shame me for trying to moderate the forum in your grand absence. You struck a nerve in me alright, but I don't think it was the one you intended. If you want to be a leader in here, then damn it be here and be a leader regularly, but don't come in here on your intermittent whim and criticize or try to shame my efforts. I don't know who has told you what, but I am not hiding anything from anyone.
|
| |
|
|
starman1
Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 1487
Location: Earth |
Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:12 am
|
|
|
David
Thank you for clearing that up, I apologise for miscomprehending your intentions. It was because of the statement made about banning members that I took personal. In any event I do appreciate your efforts here. I agree that there is more work to be done in the ongoing efforts to educate others, and as I see it these boards are a great tool for furthering those efforts if they can be maintained free from all of the distractions that they seem to be be plagued by. Once again I apologise for my response and I do not mean to attack anyone.
starman1
Peace out... |
| |
|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:33 am
|
|
|
Starman. Apology accepted.
Sent you a PM, thank you in advance for doing as I ask. |
| |
|
|
bjane
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 118
Location: ontario |
Travel Restrictions
Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:05 pm
|
|
|
re: Travel restrictions
Excerpt from a Paul Craig Roberts article
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/071023_bush.htm
....[the] Transport Security Administration has proposed new rules that will require Americans to get government permission 72 hours in advance prior to being allowed to board a domestic flight.
The TSA justifies this extraordinary violation of our constitutional rights on the grounds that 90 to 93 percent of all travel reservations are final by then.
So what?!
And what of the 7 to 10 percent of flights that the TSA estimates are not on the books 72 hours in advance? These are family emergencies and critical business deals. What does the TSA care if a member of your family dies while you await the government’s permission to fly?
Any agency of the government that can propose such a tyrannical regulation should be abolished. The TSA’s mentality shows it to be a far greater threat to Americans than are terrorists.
Even without the "permission to fly" rule, the TSA’s practices are ridiculous and unjustified. The confiscation of tooth paste and unopened bottles of perfume, the harassment of US military officers in uniform, the harassment of old people struggling with their walkers, of mothers struggling with small children--none of this makes any sense except in terms of getting Americans accustomed to harassment as a citizen’s duty to government and to train a cadre to conduct warrantless searches of fellow citizens.
The no-fly list itself is absurd. If a known terrorist were to show up at an airport, he would be arrested, not refused permission to fly. Anyone else who can clear security like other passengers has every right to fly.
Set aside the violation of the Constitution and the Soviet-style tyranny of the loss of the freedom to travel and consider merely the practical aspect of the proposal. What American wants his travel plans dependent on a government bureaucracy capable of putting US Senator Ted Kennedy on the "no fly" list and capable of issuing US visas to two of the alleged 9/11 hijackers six months after they allegedly died in the 9/11 events?... |
| |
|
|

|
|

All times are GMT. The time now is Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|