Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
To sorethroat

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Chemtrails

Author Thread
canex





Joined: 26 Oct 2000
Posts: 164
Location: USA
PostWed Mar 20, 2002 2:32 pm  Reply with quote  

Obviously, I am casting pearls at swine. The references are given in the previous posts. Read them for yourself, as you do not believe me.

Your math is correct if you are talking in relative terms (i.e., % of % relative humidity, error of 100% relative to 7% = 7%). I was talking in absolute terms and assumed that you were (i.e., % relative humidity, error of 100% is 7% + or - 100%). The dry bias error is huge as noted earlier. The random error is on the order of 10% in relative terms.
 View user's profile Send private message
canex





Joined: 26 Oct 2000
Posts: 164
Location: USA
PostWed Mar 20, 2002 2:59 pm  Reply with quote  

I'm sorry, I didn't answer all of your questions, as if it makes any diference. Here are some more pearls.

The standard used to determine that the relative humidity sensors measure too low is a frost-point hygrometer, a research-grade, cryogenically cooled instrument designed specifically to measure humidity at low temperatures.

I have already provided measures of how low the sonde values are for two temperatures, but to address your specific request, they are low by a factor of 1.1 at -30C up to 2.5 at -70C. You're good at math, you can determine the error in terms of percent (relative).

 View user's profile Send private message
Sore Throat





Joined: 01 Sep 2000
Posts: 1802
Location: x
PostThu Mar 21, 2002 4:08 am  Reply with quote  

Thank you canex.

So a relative humidity measurement of 25% at -30 degrees, low by a factor of 1.1, would actually be 27.5%.

and "up to" a factor of 2.5 would mean that a measurement of 25% relative humidity at -70 degrees, would "theoretically" equate to a "true" relative humidity of 62.5%.

By my calculations, a 250% measurement error.

There aren't many examples of places that we use measuring devices that are subject to a 250% measurement error.

But then you did say, "up to".

...and we know how you like to stretch the edge of the envelope.

I do appreciate your help though...

honestly.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

All times are GMT.
The time now is Mon May 21, 2012 5:00 pm


  Display posts from previous:      



Conspiracy List | Arcade Webmaster | Escape Games


© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum