|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
USAF "hellbent" on Christmas Mid-West Ice Storm
Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:51 am
|
|
|
If I've offended anyone with the title, I apologize. It's an oxymoron given the holiday coming up and the Satantic intensions of the USAF.
The USAF is planning another major Ice Event for the Mid-West on Christmas as denoted by the IR Satellite. Let's take a tour tonight of the different regions they are spraying and how they will affect the weather for the next 5 days and Christmas. We'll also show some graphics to give a 3-D approach to their spraying operations and look at changes in short term forecasts by the GFS versus the actual observation, so we can see the actual effects from the USAF's activities over the past 24 hours.
Here's the Satellite photo from this afternoon.
The Goals of the USAF are clear cut. Now let's examine how these particles influence different layers of the atmosphere realitive to their position in the atmosphere.
Here is a normal clear day over the Ocean. The ocean absorbs roughly 90% of the incoming solar radation. The water is heated at the surface and the water warms the atmosphere near the surface. Temperatures aloft are affected by other large scale systems, such as thunderstorms, extratropical cyclones,etc.
Now we have our chemplanes spray an area of the ocean. No longer is the heat being absorbed by the Ocean, but by the Mid and Upper troposphere. The materials the USAF are using today would absorb roughly 90% of the total solar radation and deposit it in the form of heat aloft. Over the N.Central Pacific this is creating an artifical warm front ahead of the storm entering into the Gulf of Alaska.
Now over land the chemtrails affect the atmosphere somewhat differently. The land absorbs less solar radation than the ocean, anywhere between 20%(over snowpack) to 80% over heavily forested regions. As a result of the chemcloud, heat is now transfered again aloft, but surface temperatures rise more slowly as the energy is being absorbed by the chemcloud at higher altitudes.
As the chemtrails move over time they begin to fall due to gravity. As they fall they heat lower and lower levels of the atmosphere on their descent, creating an inverted warm front.
Now let's take a look at the GFS model and compare the projections for 18 hours ago before the spraying and the latest maps.
Now remember where the USAF is spraying. We'll start over the Pacific Ocean. Let's compare the graphics of the temperatures at about 5,000 feet. First we'll start with the Gulf of Alaska low. Notice that temperatures have risen nicely along the region where the USAF has sprayed. These temperatures should rise further as now it is day time over that region. Also let's look south just off the coast of Hawaii. Aloft the jet stream is blowing west to east, but at the lower levels a strong high pressure is pushing the air westward. Our graphic really doesn't go west of Hawaii, so we have to look for this effect in the 300mb plot(jet stream). Notice that the low pressure center is pushed back and now the white lines (denoting heights) are higher east of our low pressure system. This is reflecting the heat transfer aloft.
Let's look over Texas. Look at the temperature rise over Texas and the Great Plains. It's fairly noticeable. This ia allowing the new jet stream to turn more clockwise to dig the storm moving into the West Coast further South. If we look over the West Coast we can see a sharp change in direction of the jet, just from the past 18hrs.
Now lets look at the 850mb off the Florida Coast. See we now have a new high pressure center located over the region the USAF was spraying just off the Bahamas. This is in preparation for our Christmas storm. This will be the high pressure system that stalls our West Coast system from moving into the Southeast, allowing another front to set up over the already battered regions of the Mid-West.
850mb(5000ft) temperature plot from last night, before the spraying.
After the Spraying
Jet Stream plot from last night, before the spraying,
After the Spraying
Computer Model run last night before the Spraying. Notice there is a storm but it is much further south and east.
Now look at the location of our southern storm. Notice the high pressure over the Southeastern US that was strengthened from the USAF. It is holding up the storm and pushing warm air aloft changing any snow into ice. There is a cold center of high pressure at the surface located over Michigan that will funnel cold air at the surface over the midwest creating another ice storm.
 |
| |
|
|
Cloudy Skies
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 122
Location: UK |
Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:53 pm
|
|
|
What amazes me is that if it wasn't for the USAF there wouldn't be any weather!
Ever occur to you that what you're looking at is what's been happening for millions of years? Natural weather systems which, by their nature. remain unpredictable?
Perhaps you could explain how the weather over the next 5 days cannot have ever occurred similarly in the past and can only have occurred as a result of direct manipulation? You say the USAF create a warm front. But how can you know this? And, indeed, how do they do it without any real meteorologists noticing?
Edit: you do know that by their very nature, computer models runs differ slightly every single run, especially when looking at T+138 and beyond. And they are only models. It's what a computer things may occur based on the lastest observations fed into it. Update the obs, and the outcome changes And besides, you're only looking at the Operation Run, it would be better comparing all ensemble members - the Op Run can often be a complete outlier.
I've been studying the GFS Operational Runs for the UK for Christmas for the past 10 days and every single run has been different - often quite significantly. As we get nearer I expect them to become more similar but even 24 hours beforehand I wouldn't expect the runs to be exactly identical. Nor would any other meteorologist. |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:11 am
|
|
|
According to IR photos from the overnight hours, our USAF ceased operations around 11pm EST yesterday. There was an absence and like a nice cat and mouse game I wanted to wait them out. I wanted them to make the next move to see if they relocated their aircraft. They didn't relocate some of them. The USAF once again resumed operations around 11am EST and continues to heavily target the region east and north of Hawaii this evening, in an attempt to build the ridge of high pressure off the CA coast. This will dig the Western through deeper as we move into Sunday. I expect heavy spraying tomorrow from Northern and Central Mexico through Texas and Arkansas as the upper level system ejects from the Intermountain West into the Desert Southwest. They will attempt to strengthen the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico High pressure systems for our Christmas Ice Storm.
If we go all the way back to the top of the page and look at where the USAF was spraying last night. We look at the chems across the West Coast. They would be descending today upon the Great Plains states from North Dakota south through Texas. Notice the jump in temperatures from projected to actual and over a 18hr forecast. Pretty amazing as the particles made it into the lower levels of the troposphere. Also pretty amazing the temperature trend given it's the lowest sun angle of the year. This is some pretty remarkable stuff the USAF is spraying into the atmosphere.
Projection from 1am this morning...(18 hr forecast)
Actual and observe the temperature rise.
Each model run is different of course, but I look for trends and look for trends in the direction I expect from looking at what the USAF is doing. Tonight's 18Z run makes no logical sense at all, espically the way it handles the Christmas storm. I have not seen the ridge across the Southern Plains behave like that all November or December. Someone has the finger on that output. |
| |
|
|
Lophofo
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 18
|
USAF chemtrail spraying
Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:52 am
|
|
|
Hey, weatherman714, I'm in the Intermountain West, and we got our share of hail and then snow yesterday evening.
I wanted to get your thoughts on HAARP, the ionosphere, and any possible relations to chemtrails, or the way in which the jetsream is obviously being manipulated through this spraying.
Afterall, the Official HAARP website does say
quote: Originally posted by Official HAARP Website
The HAARP program is jointly managed by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research. The facility is being constructed by commercial contractors through a contract with ONR.
What are your thoughts on HAARP  |
| |
|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
Heh
Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:35 am
|
|
|
Funny to ask a shill his thoughts on a shill program. This guy is a straw man here to take you away from the topic at hand. Did you miss the thread where he threatened to sell his "weather secrets" to the russians and or chinese? Do you think he will provide you with real information? Are you another one of them sent to prop up his claims by posting questions? _________________ “To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:23 am
|
|
|
Holding my breath this evening over our Christmas storm...(We may have stopped it) Tonight I want to bring this discussion back stateside and expand on what I've been teaching everyone about how chemtrails warm the upper atmosphere. I said this morning spraying started heavily across Western Texas. Here's the Water Vapor Loop.
Watch the signature across Texas at the start of the loop move eastward into Oklahoma, Eastern Texas, Southwestern Missouri,and Arkansas. Notice the uniqueness of that signature. Also pay attention across the Northern Plains, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota. They have the same type of appearance, but one difference. The ones across the Northern Plains have a very soft appearance. Those are the "counter clockwise" chemtrails or the precipitation inducing ones. They appear milky white when sprayed overhead or slightly yellow in the distance. They are plastic fibers with endothermic bacteria attached. Their net effect is to cool the atmosphere. The ones across the Southern Plains are the reddish color one that have a reddish hue, or appear to be a very solid white overhead. These warm the upper atmosphere. Let's look at a 12hr projection versus the actual numbers. Pay close attention to both of the areas I described above.
Here's the 12hr projection.
And the actual numbers.
Let's look across Western Texas where the spraying was initiated this morning. That is where the greatest temperature rise is and a significant one as well. Also you can clearly see temperature rises across Northern Mexico where the spray was along with Oklahoma, Arkansas and Southwestern Missouri. Now look to the north. We see the exact opposite in the temperature aloft as they have cooled across Minnesota, Eastern North Dakota, Eastern South Dakota, Northern Iowa and Western Wisconsin, where that counter-clockwise spray is present. They are plastic fibers with endothermic bacteria that enable ice crystal formation at much warmer temperatures. They essentially remove heat from the atmosphere through bacterial growth on the plastic fibers.
Another interesting point is you can pick just about anywhere else on that map where the USAF didn't spray and find little if any temperature change. The same hold true from last nights discussion as well.
*** If anyone else noticed, the region of the chemtrails sprayed today fell within my watchbox. It's almost as if the USAF is saying Hi we're watching, or it was just dumb luck that they would spray in that region... you can decide that one. 
Last edited by weatherman714 on Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:40 am; edited 2 times in total |
| |
|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
Uh
Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:25 am
|
|
|
Make a testable hyphothesis, please. What are your predictions over Illinois for the entire day of Christmas? If you can provide specific predictions that come true, I'll be your number one fan. I'm not trying to debunk you here, this is your time to shine. _________________ “To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:36 am
|
|
|
quote: Hey, weatherman714, I'm in the Intermountain West, and we got our share of hail and then snow yesterday evening.
I wanted to get your thoughts on HAARP, the ionosphere, and any possible relations to chemtrails, or the way in which the jetsream is obviously being manipulated through this spraying.
HAARP would be a great weather manipulator overhead as it shoots a tremendous amount of radation into the atmosphere to change the Kennly-Heavyside layer. The problem with it being able to modify the weather at a distance falls with the fact that the energy received would drop at 1/(distance) squared. 500 miles the amount of radation would fall drastically and would not have an effect over a broad area. It is possible to shoot localized energy beams and disrupt local weather patterns as often is the case around Fredericksburg,VA The USAF loves shooting some sort of directed energy in an West-East fashion there. As well as straight down the Potomac River in a NW-SE direction. The amount of energy available at a higher altitude due to less atoms being able to scatter the sun energy would make directed field energy beams useless. One would have a much greater effect on the weather by creating an artifical layer with the desired albedo. 1366W/m^2 coming from the sun. A few square miles over a period of 8hours and then add in radative properties of the atmosphere and one can quickly see how using HAARP to modify the weather at a great distance is a complete waste of time. Over Alaska and Greenland it would be a great location to modify the weather. Say if you wanted extra radation over Greenland to melt the polar ice caps, or create cloudiness over them to keep the temperatures down. |
| |
|
|
Cloudy Skies
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 122
Location: UK |
Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:15 am
|
|
|
How would increasing or increasing ionisation of the Kennelly-Heavyside layer impact on weather? Given that such changes occur naturally on a daily basis and show no effect on what happens in the troposphere many, many, miles below?
As for chemtrail spraying causing weather modification - do you have any evidence of such spraying in the places you claim it is being carried out? So far, your evidence of spraying seems to derive from seeing low level clouds associated with frontal systems appearing on satellite images. How can you tell these are not as natural as all the other clouds appearing in such images?
Surely a more exact method would be to collate reports of spraying and mark them on a satellite image, then compare with subsequent images and predictions from GFS and other models output to see whether known spraying in known locations affects the development of predicted weather systems? |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:05 am
|
|
|
clicked wrong button...
Last edited by weatherman714 on Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:09 am
|
|
|
quote: How would increasing or increasing ionisation of the Kennelly-Heavyside layer impact on weather? Given that such changes occur naturally on a daily basis and show no effect on what happens in the troposphere many, many, miles below?
Simple, spray a mass of chemtrails over the region you are targeting and use HAARP's energy output to heat the atmosphere over top the region to the exact temperature profile that one might desire.
quote: As for chemtrail spraying causing weather modification - do you have any evidence of such spraying in the places you claim it is being carried out? So far, your evidence of spraying seems to derive from seeing low level clouds associated with frontal systems appearing on satellite images. How can you tell these are not as natural as all the other clouds appearing in such images?
This wouldn't happen to be Dr. Travis from the Univ of Wisconsin under the false pretence of being someone from the UK would it? I have an e-mail that was forwarded to me with the same exact criticism word for word from your e-mail address at the Univ of Wisc. Obviously you and Dr. Minnis are some very very jealous people. Getting beat by what was a 20 y/o 3rd yr Physics student in 2002 at something your suppose to be a world renounced expert on.
Anyone with any Satellite interpretation experience that would take one quick look at the areas I've circled for chemtrail formation would recognize without even looking at the enhanced photos that those are indeed clouds in the mid to upper ranges of the troposphere. What are you trying to prove? Why would you waste your time on a "nobody"?
quote: Surely a more exact method would be to collate reports of spraying and mark them on a satellite image, then compare with subsequent images and predictions from GFS and other models output to see whether known spraying in known locations affects the development of predicted weather systems?
I've been doing that since 2002. I'm sure your well aware of my discussions going back to early 2003. I was 21 at the time. It's nice to know there are a group of Internet stalker scientists that have a great fascination for what I'm able to do and foresee in the weather world. It's the sole reason I've been blackballed. The scientific community is frightened at what I bring to the table... and I'm now only 26. By the way it's the same drive as the head coach of the Patriots. He grew up in my county and he holds the same drive that our cutlure promotes. We are extremely competitive people that are hated, not for what we can do, but for what others are not. |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:56 am
|
|
|
I didn't know it mattered that I grew up watching MTV in the early 80's. I use to be scared to death by Phil Collins in the air tonight video with the his face shadowed in the video. I was 3 y/o. Moving past the non-sense. ..
I think we can all goto bed tonight or tomorrow night knowing that chemtrail boards do have a purpose. I want to thank everyone for listening and you deserve a pat on the back. I'm fairly confident that we forced the USAF to blink and we stopped this storm.
Let's look at tonight's IR photo and the ingredients that would create this storm, if it were to happen. We have two systems moving into the Gulf of Alaska. One system is bringing high level clouds to the Pacific Northwest and judging by the signatures the USAF is spraying that region. Off to the west of that storm, we have an entire storm untouched by chemtrails. Notice the smooth texture to the clouds, no straight lines, no criss-crossing lines, no unique signatures. Just nature at its finest. Off to the East of Hawaii we have what is left of last night's operation in the form of decaying chemtrails. Put everything together and from what the USAF is doing over Western Canada and off the US West Coast, it should strengthen the Canadian high pressure system moving behind our current Central US storm. This should suppress most of the Gulf of Mexico moisture from moving northward over the Southern Plains on Monday and Tuesday. This will kill our chances of a major icing and storm event for Christmas day.
Now moving on to showing how uneducated Cloudy Skies is in regards to Satellite interpretation. Let's look at the Enhanced IR. Look at the regions I've circled in yellow. It should become extremely obvious to the novice viewer that they are not low level clouds, but mid to high level clouds. Pay close attention to the region between California and Hawaii. Notice the "3-D" effect?
I think we can take from this, the possibility that the USAF is willing to work with us on some weather events that they may have plans for. It's sorta like the thief that walks into the store knowing he's being watched, versus the thief that walks in the store that has the doubt in their minds of "Am I being watched?". |
| |
|
|
Cloudy Skies
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 122
Location: UK |
Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:59 am
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by weatherman714
I think we can all goto bed tonight or tomorrow night knowing that chemtrail boards do have a purpose. I want to thank everyone for listening and you deserve a pat on the back. I'm fairly confident that we forced the USAF to blink and we stopped this storm.
If only we had the same influence when it came to US military policy in Iraq
No, I'm not Dr Travis, nor to I have any connection with him (I'm 100% definitely living in the UK) other than having read a few of his papers regarding contrails and their impact on climate  |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
Mon Dec 24, 2007 6:21 pm
|
|
|
quote: I'm fairly confident that we forced the USAF to blink and we stopped this storm.
We came a blink from this storm. Many,many,many thanks to everyone that paid attention. Most of us that live in the Central and Eastern US should be thankful for it. The rest of the people we helped out will never even know what we've done for them. A Christmas Present from a secert Santa.
 |
| |
|
|

|
|

All times are GMT. The time now is Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 am
|
|
|
|
|