Chemtrail Central
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Flight Explorer
Silver Orbs
News Archive

Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
Former NHC Chief Neil Frank Disputes Storms

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Weather

Author Thread

tagged & banned

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland
Former NHC Chief Neil Frank Disputes Storms PostWed Jan 02, 2008 4:22 pm  Reply with quote  

"Former National Hurricane Center chief Neil Frank disputes storms
last year" (Source: South Florida Sun-Sentinel, 1/2/0Cool

A well-known name in hurricane-forecasting circles Neil Frank
challenging how the National Hurricane Center classifies storms. Last
year, he contends, six of the 15 named systems may have been too weak
to really deserve tropical storm status.

"They're questionable," said Frank, the hurricane center's director
from 1974 to 1987 and now chief meteorologist for KHOU-TV, the CBS
affiliate in Houston.

Though it might seem he is trying to upstage the hurricane center, his
real intent, Frank said, is to dispute that global warming has led to
more active Atlantic tropical storm seasons, as several meteorological
studies have asserted. Over the past decade, Frank maintains, numerous
systems were classified as tropical storms and hurricanes that
probably didn't warrant that status.

Winnow out those systems from the annual lists, and present-day
tropical weather may be no more intense than in the past, he says.

"The historical records are not adequate to determine if global
warming has affected number and strength of tropical systems," he said.

The inflation in the number of named storms has come about, Frank
says, because the hurricane center has adopted different and, in
opinion, looser guidelines on how storms are named.

Until the mid 1990s, the hurricane center relied on central barometric
pressure as the primary yardstick of a storm's strength. The lower the
pressure, the stronger a system. Storms with readings of 1005
millibars or higher were deemed too weak to be named, Frank said.

If that standard were in place now, four of 2007's storms, including
Erin, Gabrielle, Ingrid and Melissa, would be disputable, he said.
Two, Chantal and Jerry, would not have been named at all because both
formed in the Atlantic well to the north of the tropical region, even
though their central pressures were relatively low, he added.

Further, Hurricane Felix, designated a ferocious Category 5, would
have been deemed "a strong Category 4," according to central pressure
measurements, said Frank.

Then came a change in philosophy in 1996, Frank said. Forecasters
started to place more emphasis on satellite imagery to calculate a
storm's sustained winds. Yet Frank maintains the central pressure
method of naming storms is more accurate because with satellite
imagery, forecasters estimate winds based on their reading of cloud

While Frank's assertions may seem academic, they raise questions
whether the hurricane center is too quick to give storms names. And
the number of systems per year is important for historic records and
spotting trends.

Those trends, in turn, are factored into how insurance companies set
premiums for homeowner coverage, Tom Zutell, spokesman for the Florida
Office of Insurance Regulation, said. Specifically, trends are entered
into computer models as one of the elements that determines rates, he

"That is one tool that insurance companies use," he said. "But it's
not the only tool that they use to actuarially arrive at rates they
need to pay clients."
At the National Hurricane Center, forecasters say if they're finding
more storms and hurricanes these days, it's because they have new
technological tools at their disposal.

"Things have changed since Neil Frank's era," said Chris Landsea, the
center's science and operations officer. "I would agree with him that
we're naming more now than we did then. But I would also argue we're
naming them correctly. We just have more tools to do it correctly."

Among those tools: geostationary and polar orbiting satellites, which,
in addition to providing detailed imagery, allow forecasters to
pinpoint the strongest tropical-force winds as well the temperatures
in the atmosphere around them, he said.

Hurricane hunter aircraft have been equipped with stepped frequency
microwave radiometers, which provide an accurate reading of wind
speeds near the ocean surface, he said.

Landsea said the hurricane center, which is in Miami-Dade County, uses
strict guidelines to name storms. A system must have sustained surface
winds of at least 39 mph, cannot be near a cold front to ensure it's a
"tropical cyclone, not a winter one" and must have organized
thunderstorm activity around its core.

"If it has all of those, we name it," he said.

At the same time, Landsea agreed with Frank that global warming likely
isn't responsible for the surge in tropical activity since 1995,
notably during 2005, the busiest year on record with 28 named storms.

Landsea said it's possible other eras and other years were just as
active. He noted that in 2005, 17 systems made landfall. In 1933,
previously the most active season on record with 21 named systems, 19
made landfall.

"So if you just look at ones that made landfall, 1933 was busier," he
said. "The years were probably fairly comparable in overall activity."
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

All times are GMT.
The time now is Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:47 am

  Display posts from previous:      

© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum, All Your Base