|
|
BOB B

Joined: 19 Jan 2002
Posts: 307
Location: LINDEN ,TEXAS,CASS |
Chemtrail Forecast
Wed Apr 24, 2002 11:20 am
|
|
|
Chemtrail forecast for 24 april.Due to stable and normal readings from the solar satelites , no large active sunspots facing earth or likly to soon,and the probabilities of x-class flares very low this is the first day I can predict only light sporadic spraying .Expect a break in the spraying to occur april 24 |
| |
|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 3:44 am
|
|
|
N.Calif. No spraying for the past two days, then before daylight today and continuing all day, we were slammed by chems. It is now 6:40 PDT and they are still going at it. |
| |
|
|
mark sky

Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
Thu Apr 25, 2002 5:07 am
|
|
|
looking at the satelites i can back up davids observations
as well that all of Nevada and the southwest california deserts were covered
and just a small area around here
Bob~ search out
"the report from iron mountain"
look down the resultant hits until
you find the original
naught the cover ups
their you find the plan that was made for todaz times
to scare us into line |
| |
|
|
penumbra

Joined: 24 Apr 2001
Posts: 672
Location: North Carolina |
Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:24 pm
|
|
|
Ditto for Coastal Carolina.
Sorry I haven't added my observations til now, but the "weather" here in NC has not corresponded to BobB's sunscreen theory. By the way, I thought that theory was killed long ago? |
| |
|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 5:21 pm
|
|
|
I agree with you on that score penumbra, his "forecast" never matched what was and is going on in N. Calif. |
| |
|
|
Anne
Joined: 04 Feb 2001
Posts: 123
Location: Napa, CA USA |
Fri Apr 26, 2002 8:43 pm
|
|
|
On Wed. evening there are a circle around the moon too. Looking at the satellite pics today you can also see many Xs on NRL. They are a spraying again. You sure feel the effects of it too physically and mentally.
Glad I am heading south for a few days. |
| |
|
|
The Interloper
Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 10
Location: Planet Earth(for now) |
Mon Apr 29, 2002 7:05 pm
|
|
|
As I stated in another thread here, sure Bob missed the mark on a few of his forecasts, and dispite Thermits paranoid conclusion that I am BobB,I am not, nor does Thermit have any real reason to think so other than I believe BobB is right .I must here say I have reviewed his data and found his predictions to be around 90% accurate.Do you not you wish your weatherman could predict the weather as good??Being critical is one thing, but intentionally trying to trash a sound hypothesis with tons of data indicating it's reality is not only counterproductive, but may indicate that the true purpose of this board may be to take down names and steer us away from the truth.I here make this statement...Iam not BobB , nor do I know who BobB is, but looking over this board it seems he is one of the few here reacting from his heart and not some finacial or propaganda reason |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
Mon Apr 29, 2002 7:23 pm
|
|
|
BOB B/Interloper, you are just making yourself look silly. Just because you don't understand the technology by which I know with 100% certainty that you are in fact BOB B doesn't mean that you are right. It's pretty obvious that you are BOB B to most anyway due to your posting style, typing style, and that fact that you think BOB B is so great. Take care, but go find another board... |
| |
|
|

|
|

All times are GMT. The time now is Mon May 21, 2012 6:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|