|
|
goldrush
Joined: 04 Sep 2000
Posts: 109
Location: No, Calif. USA |
More ANTI-Contrail/Aviation Mania from Europe-Must read
 Wed Sep 20, 2000 3:46 am
|
 |
|
Seeker and friends, Look at this, info about contrail/pollution from "hush-kits", noise pollution, visibility pollution, ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, Blueskies will love this, www.pollution.dk/index-engelsk.htm and www.pollution.dk/summary-for-policymakers.htm#45 These are greenies, for sure, but their alarmist interpretation of facts, still bears more weight than the "chemspraying" theory! Worth reading. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Fri Sep 29, 2000 7:29 am
|
|
|
Just what about this hush-kit thing ?
I would agree contrails have been around , but not like what we are seeing today or for the last couple three years.....and the persistent contrails seem to be ,or are in a more conducive habitat than years ago....is this cause or effect ?
Could a equipment and or a fuel change be the result of our skies...being somewhat..cloudy....the majority of the time, in some areas ?
|
| |
|
|
Swedishoo
Joined: 09 Aug 2000
Posts: 429
Location: NC |
|
Mon Oct 02, 2000 3:11 am
|
|
|
Goldrush,
Links wouldn't come up.
I heard that the hush-kits don't work, and are a joke.
Christy |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Mon Oct 02, 2000 4:06 am
|
|
|
>I heard that the hush-kits don't work, and are a joke.
If they don't work , doesn't it make you wonder why they were mandated to be installed .....
Hmmmmmmm |
| |
|
|
goldrush
Joined: 04 Sep 2000
Posts: 109
Location: No, Calif. USA |
|
Mon Oct 02, 2000 6:13 am
|
|
|
My spontaneous answer, would be that regulation spawns quick fixes that resemble such effort. I remember that once in a car race, doors that open and shut were a requirement. Some people painted doors on their cars, and were permitted to race. It is a weird world, and the ways of trying to maintain political correctness are always avenues to acceptability. The global warming perceived threat, that aviation is contributory, means that whoever has the most airplanes flying above FL23 thousand, will be taxed more in relationship to other sources of minute gasses output into the atmosphere. Demerits for productivity. Scientists in atmospheric research see this as a gold mine for their continued existence in government workplaces. Toe the line and get paid for research that will say what their employers want to hear. Many thousands of scientists disagree, but get no press. Hmmmmmmmmmm........ just because some nonsense idea is put to paper, does not mean it will happen, or is true. There are lots of way to inculcate an audience with fear, to create a voting block. Just watch Gore. Judge for yourselves. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Mon Oct 02, 2000 6:33 am
|
|
|
You have some of the best spontaneous thought !
gore....indeed.....
what if this whole contrail / chemtrail deal is straight out of the klinton playbook, as a major design to cloud up the sky and incite thought provocation and influence the issue of global warming ?
If early speculation is correct a minor change in fuel ingrediants and hush-kits, some doctor peabody working for klinton in some laboratory, figured out how to do......
boy, the mind can race... eh ?? |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Mon May 21, 2012 7:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
