Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
How Kucinich’s “chemtrails” disappeared… from right under Co

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Chemtrails

Author Thread
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
How Kucinich’s “chemtrails” disappeared… from right under Co PostTue Apr 02, 2002 11:09 pm  Reply with quote  

http://www.columbusalive.com/2002/20020328/032802/03280205.html

Into thin air
How Kucinich’s “chemtrails” disappeared… from right under Congress’ nose!

by Bob Fitrakis

U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich’s Space Preservation Act of 2001, introduced last October seeking a “permanent ban on basing of weapons in space,” specifically banned chemtrails as weapons. Now, in a new version of the bill, the “chemtrails” language has disappeared. The missing words are part of an eyes-wide-open denial that says as much about the cover-up as it does about the spraying that’s plainly visible in the sky.

On March 16, in a front-page story titled “Conspiracy theorists look up,” the Akron Beacon Journal noted that Kucinich’s bill “had been rewritten…and the references to chemtrails and the other types of weapons were quietly eliminated.” The Beacon Journal article, linking chemtrails to conspiracies, resulted from massive local pressure. Michel Massullo of Akron provided Columbus Alive with rolls of photos of plane trails and a sworn affidavit attesting to extensive aerial activity over that city on February 18 and February 24.

Sources close to Kucinich’s new bill, HR 3616, which has been endorsed by some 254 community groups throughout the nation, say the term “chemtrail” was dropped because Kucinich, a Democrat from Lakewood, couldn’t get the Union of Concerned Scientists or the Federation of American Scientists to sign on.

Previously explaining the government’s position, Lieutenant Colonel Michael K. Gibson of the U.S. Air Force wrote U.S. Representative Mark Green in August 2000 and stated, “The term ‘chemtrail’ is a hoax that began circulating approximately three years ago which asserts the government is involved in a joint federal program of covert spraying of the public.”

It’s a classic non-denial denial: Gibson is denying that the Air Force is secretly spraying U.S. citizens. The reality is the U.S. Space Command and other government agencies are involved in ongoing experiments for military and environmental purposes that involve aerial spraying, and the microfibers and other sprayed chemicals inevitably fall to earth, putting the public at risk.

Before you believe Gibson’s and the government’s “denial,” do an Internet search for the following terms: Joint Vision for 2020; weather as a force modifer; owning the weather by 2025; Eastlund; and Edward Teller. Two scientists working at Wright Patterson Air Force Base confirmed to Alive that they were involved in aerial spraying experiments. One involved aluminum oxide spraying related to global warming and the other involved barium stearate and had to do with high-tech military communications.

The U.S. government has a long history of denying inexcusable covert operations. These are the people who told you about the joys of nuclear radiation and Readi Kilowatt, that Agent Orange could defoliate a tropical jungle overnight but was harmless to humans. This is the same government that secretly experimented on its citizens with everything from syphilis to LSD.

The Pentagon would now have you believe that the mass sightings of chemtrails all over North America are collective hallucinations, even though the boys at the government’s Lawrence Livermore experimental lab admit that they’ve discussed all this aerial spraying and run computer simulations on the effects of weather modification for military and peacetime purposes.

A brief history of the chemtrail phenomenon can be traced to a Washington state man who told award-winning investigative reporter William Thomas that he’d become ill on New Year’s Day 1999 after watching several jets make strange lines in the sky. Within six months, Thomas, writing primarily for the Environmental News Service, had detailed over 700 eyewitness reports of chemtrails from 40 states.

Mainstream newspapers have gone out of their way to dismiss these eyewitness accounts. Thomas told the New Mexican newspaper in June 1999, “It’s easier to sell UFOs to major media than a phenomena as close in many cities as the nearest window.”

The New Mexican took a skeptical view of the local Skywatchers group and their account of “unmarked government planes puffing strange white smoke, making cryptic Xs and tic-tac-toe designs, covering the air above as the puzzled populace looks up in fear and confusion.” The photos from Akron that arrived last week show the same patterns in the sky.

A news database search showed that 24 local TV stations from around the country have reported on and dismissed the same phenomenon in the last few years. On January 14, Baltimore’s WJZ-TV report included a visual of “last Thursday morning’s chemtrails seen in the sky.” The story was almost identical to one broadcast by Orlando station WOFL in July 2000.

Last May, the West-Quebec Post spread chemtrails photographs across its front page (the Canadian press has been much more open to investigating the phenomenon). Fred Ryan, the Post’s publisher, reported that his readers had been photographing and comparing the aerial activity for some time.

While the U.S. government is busy with the latest in a long series of covert experiments, and contemptuously attempts to convince eyewitnesses that they’re crazy, non-governmental organizations are quietly circulating a proposed UN treaty titled Permanent Ban on Basing of Weapons in Space; listed under the heading “Exotic weapons” is the term “chemtrails.” This treaty is a direct outgrowth of UN General Assembly Resolution 55/32, passed 138-0 with three nations abstaining (the United States, Israel and Micronesia).

Sooner or later the government will declassify documents, as it inevitably does, showing that it engaged in aerial spraying for military and environmental purposes. Until then, the government will continue to tell us we don’t see what we obviously see.

March 28, 2002

Copyright © 2002 Columbus Alive, Inc. All rights reserved.

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
herbivore





Joined: 20 Jan 2002
Posts: 105
Location: New Mexico
PostWed Apr 03, 2002 12:50 am  Reply with quote  

"Sooner or later the government will declassify documents.... Until then, the government will continue to tell us we don’t see what we obviously see."

And will continue to tar as a "hoaxer" anyone with eyes to see and who won't shut up about it. Not to mention sic debunkers on their cases.

_________________________



It isn't easy bein' green



[Edited 4 times, lastly by herbivore on 04-02-2002]
 View user's profile Send private message
Raelven





Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 123
Location: Númenor
PostMon Feb 03, 2003 8:24 am  Reply with quote  

Bumping this rather than this per board op.
While you were sleeping.....

HR2977 is now known as HR3136, and more than the word "chemtrails" has been edited out.

Compare:
Sec. 7 HR-2977 DEFINITIONS

In this Act:

(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:

(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;

(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;

(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or

(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.

(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--

(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or

(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;

(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.


and now look at:
Sec. 7 HR-3616 DEFINITIONS

note these clauses are no longer in the Bill (ii);(I),(II),(III) & (B);(i),(ii),(iii),(iv),(v),(vi),(vii)

In this Act:

(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2) The terms `space-based weapon' and `space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(A) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object or person;

(B) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person;

(C) directing a source of energy against that object or person; or

(D) any other undeveloped means.


H.R.3616 other information -
Sponsor: Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10] (introduced 1/23/2002)

Latest Major Action: 2/13/2002 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

COSPONSORS(9), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]Sort: by date)
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 4/9/2002 [MO-1]
Rep Filner, Bob - 4/9/2002 [CA-50]
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. - 4/9/2002 [NY-26]
Rep Hoeffel, Joseph M. - 4/9/2002 [PA-13]
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. - 7/11/2002 [IL-2]
Rep Lee, Barbara - 4/9/2002 [CA-9]
Rep McKinney, Cynthia A. - 4/9/2002 [GA-4]
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete - 4/9/2002 [CA-13]
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. - 5/20/2002 [NY-12]

Write your Congress & House and ask them why this bill was censored... don't let a Patriot Act for space be passed under our noses, too.

Much respect,

Rae the Elven

------------------
Elen síla lumenn' omentielvo!

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Raelven on 02-03-2003]
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

All times are GMT.
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:10 pm


  Display posts from previous:      



Conspiracy List | Arcade Webmaster | Escape Games


© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum