|
|
Dick Eastman
Joined: 10 Feb 2001
Posts: 33
Location: Yakima, Washington, USA |
ENVIRONMENTAL WARFARE: EARTHQUAKES AND CWM
 Sun Mar 04, 2001 10:36 am
|
 |
|
Like the weather and the oceans, the mantle beneith the
floating tectonic plates also involve convection cells, but
in a plastic medium that sets up wave patterns that may
may be modified by superimposition of additional waves.
It is that fact that makes the following interesting:
ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES
>
> Have not seen the book referenced below, but could the
> abnormal activity on 3.39 MHz February 20 and prior be
> linked to the Seattle quake? If so, why would HAARP
> (supposedly funded by U.S. sources) be used to create quakes
> or other assorted EM mayhem on U.S. property? I picked up a
> signal so strong it went right off the S meter on my SW set
> at that frequency at 6:00 am on Feb 20th. Took an audio
> sampling of half an hour but can't make hide or hair of what
> HAARP is broadcasting, just that it's STRONG.
Answer: HAARP is operated by the unaccountable secret
organizations, a group that long ago made its own peace with
the enemy and today merely carries on the charade of
protecting the U.S. For example, the CIA, Mossad and the
Peoples Liberation Army together act as one giant transnational
corporation and NGO in a host of secret "research" ventures, including
weather modification and other geophyscial science. But this
alliance also has a mercenary side to it as well (see article on
weather modification, following the book notice, below).
> econews@ecologynews.com wrote:
> EARTH CHANGES: ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES
>
> VANCOUVER, BC - In the aftermath of the Seattle, WA
> earthquake of 28 February 2001, Universebooks.com is
> immediately releasing a review pre-publication version of
> its new eBook on Environmental War and Global Earthquakes.
> You can now read a review copy of the challenging new eBook
> EARTH CHANGES (Universebooks.com) at:
> http://www.universebooks.com/earthchanges.html
> EARTH CHANGES explores the disciplines of catastrophic
> geology, seismology, vulcanology, parapsychology, and public
> interest policy analysis. Author Alfred Lambremont Webre
> develops a new field theory explaining how an age of global
> earthquakes might be fulfilled -- not by earth system
> mechanics, but by the deployment of a new generation of
> electromagnetic weapons, used in environmental warfare.
>
> Electromagnetic (EM) weapons are a possible trigger of
> cataclysmic earth events. EM fields can superheat the
> ionosphere, devastating magnetic bands around the earth, and
> in turn causing massive disruption of the earth's Tectonic
> plates. A January 17, 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan may
> have been triggered by clandestine deployment of EM weapons.
> EM strategic warfare includes weather, climate and earth
> event warfare. Researchers have reported the use of EM
> weapons in anti-population mind-control operations over
> major cities.
>.......
> Author Alfred Webre, a Yale Law School graduate, is a former
> member of the Governor's Emergency Task Force on Earthquake
> Preparedness, State of California, and author of the classic
> work on Earth Changes, THE AGE OF CATACLYSM (G.P. Putnam's
> Sons 1974).
> CONTACT: Geri DeStefano, PhD, editor@universebooks.com
> EcoNews Service
> http://www.ecologynews.com
------------------------------------
In an envrionment of government
secrecy the citizen must use the
methods of science to uncover
abuse and hold officials accountable.
Sufficient evidence has accumulated
to justify the suspicion that
cloud-generation technologies are
being used to redirect, attenuate
and intensify the natural course
of meteorological and oceanographical
events by changing lower-atmosphere
pressure (air density)-- what the
public is begining to call clandestine
weather modification.
An ezboard web resource for
interdisciplinary investigation
of the possibility of clandestine
weather modification has just been
created. People are invited to post
anything there which they deem
relevant to
1) interpreting the observations
and documents that have
occasioned the CWM explanation;
2) evaluating soundness of the
science that is being
attributed to CWM; or
3) refuting or supporting the
necessary implications of CWM
if it is taking place.
The following essay presents one
first-hand observer's grounds for
suspicion that chemtrails are
clandestine weather modification
in action.
Dick Eastman
---------------------
Numerous worldwide "chemtrail"
reports ( for examples, see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm, www.chemtrailcentral.com ,
and www.rense.com ) support no
other explanation than that
large-scale operations are
underway that are modifying
the atmosphere with "treatment"
that only the most causal or
short-term observer might mistake
for the ordinary vapor-trail
condensation of jet aircraft
or natural cloud cover.
And when concerned citizens
bring this abnormality, so
obviously filling the sky,
to the attention of appropriate
authorities, including the
Environmental Protection
Agency -- a bureaucracy often
so direct and aggressive in
investigating all leads
on infractions of air-quality
regulations -- we quickly learn
that our government is neither
anxious to impound airplanes
and levy fines, nor willing to
ease growing public confusion
and fear concerning what
is being done to our atmosphere
and why.
The time has come to subject
the following as-yet-unrefuted
but also under-tested thesis
to every possible criticism and
test that disinterested research
can bring to bear.
The Clandestine Weather
Modification Thesis:
Since at least 1992 major
weather events have been
shaped by the application
of technologies that
alternately heat or cool
precise parcels of
the lower atmosphere,
thereby decreasing or
increasing, respectively,
the density of those
parcels, in order to alter
the pressure-system
dynamics that otherwise
would naturally obtain;
this being a means of
governing the movement
of heat and moisture
within the atmosphere, but
also of redirecting
wind-pushed currents of warm
or cool water near the surface
of the seas -- the
interaction of marine and
atmospheric events both
monitored and anticipated
by real-time sensors,
signal-processing, and
intervention hardware.
Let us consider the two
distinct sets of technologies
that give Clandestine Weather
Modification its directive
"push" and "pull" capabilities,
technologies involving the
generation of cloud, using
aircraft, and the dissipation
of cloud, using remote high-
energy radio-energy generating
stations respectively.
How "Chemtrail" Cloud "Pushes"
Weather Systems
If CWM is real, then the
non-dissipating cloud-cover-creating contrails/chemtrails terrifying
the observant are most-likely
being deployed to reduce the
amount of solar energy
reaching precisely determined
patches of the earth's survace,
land or ocean, in order
to effect lower-than-otherwise
surface temperatures and,
concomitantly, higher-than-otherwise
barometric pressure in the
troposphere, or lower atmosphere,
immediately above the patch.
(Consider a pan on a stove
with water heated a-little-short
of the boiling point. The heat
at the bottom of the pan sets
up convection currents,and thus
a circulating "weather" system
is created in the fluid medium.
But if only half of the pan's
bottom surface is heated, the
pattern of circulation will
change in complex, but not
wholly chaotic (unpredictable)
ways. It is to effect this kind
of dynamic pattern change that
carefully calculated loci of
chemtrailed cloud sunblock are
introduced in the thermally driven
atmosphere. In this way chemtrailing
redirects air-current flows, speeds
or slows them, or detains them in
places so the air can gain or loose
heat and moisture. And when
chemtrailing of cloud is done over
the sea, the same principle
results in a change in the winds
that push surface waters --a result
that puts the immense heat-energy
reservoir of the tropical seas at
the disposal of the weather modifiers,
giving them the capability of
steering great parcels of warm or
cooler sea water from one
geographical region to another
-- an action fertile in catastrophic
consequences of terrifying variety.
How Applied Radio Physics
"Pulls" Weather Systems
A second meteorological mystery
that the clandestine weather
modification thesis explains is
the sudden -- almost instantaneous--
disappearance of cloud before the
eyes of amazed onlookers.
This feat is the work of a second
technology, one that yields an
effect the opposite of that
caused by chemtrailing, i.e,
it eliminates high-altitude cloud
in order to allow more of the sun's
radiant energy to warm a targeted
patch of earth surface more than
would occur without this
intervention. This cloud-busting-
effected heating of patches of
surface decreases the density of
the air immediately above the
patch, causing that air to rise,
thereby creating a low-pressure
cell that will pull in (as wind)
higher-pressure air adjacent
to the patch. (This is like
adding extra heat to just
one small spot on the bottom of
a pan of water to affect
convection patterning.
To gain a better grasp of the
physics involved, get a wide
cake pan, two or three candles,
some liquid food coloring and
some candle holders. Place the
pan of water over an arrangement
of lit candles, then drop in
some of the food coloring
so that you can follow the
circulation of water in the
fluid "atmosphere." Change
the relative locations of
the candle-heated spots and
see how the convective
flow patterns change.)
Few meteorologists are familiar
with the story of Dr. Florence W.
van Straten and her discovery of
"cloud breaking."
Differential heating of parcels of
air to quickly dissipate natural
cloud accumulation is a process
pioneered in the late 1940's by
Dr. van Straten, then a Navy
meteorologist. Van Straten hit
upon the idea of using blowing
carbon black (i.e., soot) into the
atmosphere through a section of
stovepipe sticking out the opened
door of modified Superconstellation
"Hurricane Hunter." Carbon
black admits almost no light and
is more than 99 percent efficient in
capturing every bit of light energy
falling upon it.Van Straten knew
that theoretically "a pound of
very finely divided carbon
scattered in the bright sunshine
picks up enough energy each
minute to raise the temperature
of eleven tons of water from
the freezing point to the
boiling point." And even within
a cloud, there is still enough
light reflected from water
droplets and hitting the carbon
particles from all sides to
heat the cloud sufficiently to
undo vapor condensation.
In the very first experiment,
when a one-pound dose of carbon
was ejected into a cloud
formation growing from a base
of about 2,500 to a top at about
11,000 feet ("with crisp and
sharp edges and turrets looking
like boiling cauldrons, stretching
upward another thousand
feet or so") the carbon took
a few minutes to warm, but then
the results became dramatic,
as recorded from several
photo-reconnaissance planes
monitoring the experiment.
Multiple motion pictures from
different altitudes show
"that after several minutes
during which nothing happened,
the cloud suddenly spurted upward
from a point just above our
flight level. A tunnel formed
where we had flown though the
cloud, opening and widening
rapidly until the cloud was
sliced in two. The upper section
darted up several thousand feet,
becoming very wispy and
transparent. Moments after
its push upwards, it thinned out
and was gone. Almost
simultaneously, the bottom
half of the cloud turned very
dark and, as though a giant had
wiped a sponge over a slate,
it, too, disappeared. The
observers were unanimous in
testifying that there was
nothing gradual about the process.
'Now you see it. Now you don,t,'
the pilot of a jet plane flying
toward the cloud reported."
So regardless of its presence
or absence in current journals,
technology for removal of
sun-blocking atmospheric cloud
by increasing its interior
temperature has been established
by the most unassailable
criterion; it has been done.
(Perhaps not irrelevant is the
fact that van Straten was
immediately reassigned and
her project terminated
when the first progress report
of this revolutionary experiment
(including even more impressive
replications) reached the Pentagon;
"I was forced to return to
Washington because I was needed (?)
and the planes were needed elsewhere...
(yet) I was sure I had a tool for
performing significant work in
weather modification."
(Note: The question mark in the
preceding sentence is van Straten's.)
Source: Florence W. van Straten,
Weather or Not, (New York:
Dodd & Mead, 1966), chapter 12,
"Making and Breaking Clouds."
Clandestine Weather Modification
of course does not rely on
broadcasting soot to heat cloud.
Advanced radio physics has
yielded a technology that
permits high-frequency
high-energy waves to be
projected to the ionosphere
which in turn serves to reflect
and focus excited (heated)
electrons and ions onto
30-mile-diameter targets
thousands of miles from the
transmission point. This
means of heating objects
from a distance gives CWM
its weather-system "pull"
in two ways:
1) By heating cloud enough
for cloud dissipation to occur,
thereby permitting more of
the sun's radiation to reach
and heat targeted earth-surface
patches; and
2) By heating those land
and sea-surface patches (and
maybe the molecules and ions
of the unclouded lower
atmosphere itself) directly
with high-energy particle
streams focused down through
an already cloudless upper
atmosphere. (Note: this second
technique requires much more
transmission energy to achieve
a given amount of CWM pull, as it
does not rely on the sun to do
the additional "the heavy
lifting." (It should also be
remarked that the vast amounts
of electrical power this
techology requires can, in fact,
easily be supplied in abundance
by tapping natural gas at oil
wells of Alaska's North Slope.
In fact,Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency has long held a
patent that includes the design
of a 40-mile-square transmitter
for ionospheric bombardment
utilizing that very source.
The problem of
signal processing.
Data collection, data processing,
and the faster-than-real-time
modeling-for-prediction of nonlinear dynamical systems (where small
changes in initial conditions can
have incalculably divergent effects
if the "corrective interventions
cannot be calculated and applied
fast enough are not a problem for
CWM given present known
scientific capabilities.
Often presented as insurmountable
obstacles for weather modification,
the barriers imposed by tendencies
toward fundamental unpredictabilty
in systems of organized complexity
only exist if one is attempting to
change weather too far in the future
using only one single intervention
applied at time t = 0. Clandestine
weather modification, in order to
work at all, i.e., in order to
beat the tendency of nonlinear
dynamic systems to chaotic pattern
divergence, must utilize continuous
feedback and correction, and this
is exactly what existing weather
monitoring instrumentalities and
high-speed computers and software
have been capable of doing at
least since 1992.
Sociological, Political and
Economic Considerations
People in authority within the
United States Government and
various powerful non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) during
the course of World War II and
the Cold War have gained
managerial control over secret,
originally defense-related
applied technologies, including
-- as the increasingly complete
historical record now shows --
technologies that afford practical
control of discrete weather events
--as the experience of Florence
W. van Straten and the fate of
the great weather-modification
breakthrough -- what should have
been the triumph of her career --
described above, vividly
demonstrates.
Unfortunately it is in the
nature of secrecy in
organizations that those
bureaucrats and those CEO's
of NGOs who control events
through officially secret
means, soon come under strong
temptation to employ their
clandestine power to
affect economic markets for
the benefit of their own,
i.e., for the people who
enjoy the privilege of
privately networking "inside"
systems of governance, people
accountable to no one but
themselves. It is for such
as these that the existence
of a secret defense technology
for controlling weather would
present a great "moral hazzard,"
a temptation to help one's
family and friends to make a
lot of money from exclusive
knowledge and control of
future weather events.
Weather is the most powerful
and volatile variable in the
human food-supply system, and
as a consequence of this, in
the fluctuations of the
commodities and futures
markets worldwide.
Weather disasters involve
billions of dollars in emergency
funds, recovery loans,
and reconstruction investment.
Insurance companies are depleted
of capital, marginalizing
them as competition for other
big players in the financial
markets --cut in their supply
of loanable funds amounting
billions worldwide in the course
of the super-weather-disaster-
ridden 1990's.
Nor should we overlook the
suspicious new
"weather derivative" created
in recent years, a financial
instrument that permits big
finance to package and sell
risk-management "bets" on what
buyers assume to be crap-shoot
"acts of God" or of randomly
bridled and unbridled "nature,"
never suspecting that the
"game" has been loaded
by clandestine weather modification.
(British financiers developed the
first publically offered weather
derivatives, by the way.)
And finally there is the obvious
contingency that giant Wall Street
capitalized agribusiness is able to
buy up thousands of acres of small
family farms and Western ranches
following economic distress and
foreclosure of securitized first
and second mortgages, when crops
fail too many years in a row due
to drought, flood, or even merely
unseasonable "normal"
weather onsets.
In all of the above one should
keep in mind the economic reality
that, in an economic disaster,
assets are not destroyed, they
merely change hands.
Bad weather ruins crops, but
usually leaves the future
usefulness of the land unaffected.
What a hurricane destroys in
one decade -- temporarily
depressing real estate values,
may, ten years later, be the
jungle-lush site of
multi-billion-dollar up-scale
resorts owned by a consortium
of global investors.
In short, if one looks for a
"bottom-line" incentive that
would motivate development
of a CWM system that can
simultaneously cover larges
fractions of continental
and ocean surface with
chemtrailed cloud and can
utilize 40-square-mile
transmitters that suck
up tons of North Shore gas
volume to bounce high
energy off the ionosphere,
be aware: more-than-
ample economic stimulus
exists to make it all
worth while.
There you have it
-- the bare-bones CWM thesis.
And when you do join this
investigation, may you find the
rest of us all discoursing in
the spirit of John Stewart Mill
when he wrote:
"The only way in which a
human being can make some
approach to knowing the
whole of a subject is by
hearing what can be said
about it by persons of
every variety of
opinion and studying
all modes in which it
can be looked
at by every character
of mind. No wise man
ever acquired
wisdom in any mode
but this."
Dick Eastman
Yakima,Washington
U.S.A.
eastman@wolfenet.com
dickeastman@nwinfo.net
Every man is responsible to every other man.
|
| |
|
|
Dick Eastman
Joined: 10 Feb 2001
Posts: 33
Location: Yakima, Washington, USA |
|
Tue Mar 06, 2001 8:06 pm
|
|
|
I received this letter concerning the
HAARP-CWM theory. Some of it is over
my head. Know any high energy physics
(or physicists)?
-------
Could you point me to references for a few of these
intriguing comments?
> Advanced radio physics has
> yielded a technology that
> permits high-frequency
> high-energy waves to be
> projected to the ionosphere
> which in turn serves to reflect
> and focus excited (heated)
> electrons and ions onto
> 30-mile-diameter targets
> thousands of miles from the
> transmission point.
I understand the (HAARP-based) ionospheric heating
and its use in bouncing RF signals below the maximum usable frequency
(MUF), but the idea of using the lens to reflect and
focusiong electrons and ions is new to me.
How would that be accomplished? Can you point me
to the literature? It would seem that a more likely
explanation is that heated ionospheric areas are
more able to pass energetic ions from the Sun, as
implied by p. 80 and p. 134 of Begich's Angels ...
and by your second hypothesis:
> 2) By heating those land
> and sea-surface patches (and
> maybe the molecules and ions
> of the unclouded lower
> atmosphere itself) directly
> with high-energy particle
> streams focused down through
> an already cloudless upper
> atmosphere.
I'd be interested in a reference for that one too.
> In fact,Defense Advanced Research
> Projects Agency has long held a
> patent that includes the design
> of a 40-mile-square transmitter
> for ionospheric bombardment
> utilizing that very source.
What's the patent number? That one's new to me too.
Closest I can find is referenced on Begich op. cit. p. 230,
US5202689: Lightweight focusing reflector for space,
assigned to APTI.
|
| |
|
|
Dick Eastman
Joined: 10 Feb 2001
Posts: 33
Location: Yakima, Washington, USA |
|
Wed Mar 07, 2001 9:16 am
|
|
|
The powerful Richter 7.9 earthquake that devastated western India January 26, killing thousands occured on the country's national Republic Day public holiday. It was the
most intense quake felt in that region in
over 50 years, according to the Indian
Meteorological Department.
Funny how China's enemies get these earthquakes, isn't it? Consider the
Taipei earthquake of last year.
In traditional Chinese political philosophy
weather and earthquakes are the great indicators of Heaven's
"Mandate", i.e., of the legitimacy of
a regime, a dynsasty. If the Chinese
have used their own scientists and
those hired from the collapsed Soviet
Union -- and with the "open-candy-store"
policies of the Bush and Clinton years
regarding strategic technologies -- then
if CWM and CEG (clandestine earthquake
generation) are real, the People's Liberation
Army is almost certainly involved.
(I am reminded of the freak lightning
storm that killed nine during a "free
Tibet" rally in the U.S. -- it was the
first vast improbability that led me
to suspect that China was misusing weather
technology.)
It's not good when your enemies have powers
that you used to ascribe only to your God.
|
| |
|
|
Dick Eastman
Joined: 10 Feb 2001
Posts: 33
Location: Yakima, Washington, USA |
|
Sat Mar 10, 2001 6:05 am
|
|
|
A friend just mailed me this.
(I'm guessing most of you already know about it.)
Alfred Webre (author of EARTH CHANGES) & Kathy Holt (author of CIRCLE OF
HEALING) will be a live guests this Sunday 3/11/01 on host Clyde Lewis'
nationally-syndicated Ground Zero radio program on EM pulse warfare.
Included will be a discussion of EM's role in the Seattle-Vancouver
earthquake, and in environmental warfare and mass mind control (psyops),
and on positive ways we can counteract EM warfare.
Program Date: Sunday, March 11, 2001
Program times:
Show Times
6P to 9P PST
7P to 10P MST
8P to 11P CST
9P to 12A EST
2A to 5A GMT
LISTEN LIVE: http://www.broadcast.com/radio/news/kxl/ http://www.clydelewis.com/
|
| |
|
|
Dick Eastman
Joined: 10 Feb 2001
Posts: 33
Location: Yakima, Washington, USA |
|
Tue Mar 13, 2001 7:25 am
|
|
|
I have just run across a link supplied
by something called Dark Matters that
I occasionally receive and forgot how I
started receiving it -- anyway it contains
this link to an ezboard, "Stop Earthquake
and Climate War Now":
http://pub25.ezboard.com/fsurfingtheapocalypsefrm1.showMessage?topicID=44.topic
administered by "Surfing Apocalypse"
quotes the following story on "Environmental
War" -- but note, although I am quoted
in this article, just about everything
in the article is new information to me
(even the name of environmentalist
Alfred Webre whose analysis I am identified
as agreeing with. But I am certainly glad to know of his existence and hope to familiarize myself with his theory asap.
Here is the article:
ECONEWS STORY:www.ecologynews.com/cuenews12.html
Was the Seattle-Vancouver earthquake triggered by environmental
war?
EcoNews Service
VANCOUVER, BC - Was the Seattle-Vancouver earthquake of 28 February 2001 triggered - accidentally or on purpose - by new, secret electromagnetic weapons?
The Vancouver-based author of EARTH CHANGES
(Universebooks.com), environmentalist Alfred Webre, believes the deep, magnitude 6.8 earthquake may have been triggered by electromagnetic (EM) events. Other researchers, including members of the ELFRAD Group, which monitors electromagnetic (EM) events, note that HAARP, a U.S. electromagnetic (EM) weapons system in Alaska, - or some other EM source piggy-backing on HAARP's signal - may have inadvertently or intentionally affected the earthquake.
In the mid-1990s, despite the strong opposition of Congressman Ronald V. Dellums (Dem.-Calif.) the U.S. Congress narrowly approved HAARP, in the face of studies showing HAARP's negative environmental impacts. The U.S. Navy assured Congress that
HAARP would not trigger climate change or seismic events like the Seattle-Vancouver earthquake. Now, if it can be established that HAARP - or some other EM installation - had a role in causing this
earthquake, the U.S. domestic and international repercussions of this finding could be profound.
In the aftermath of the Seattle-Vancouver quake, a Yakima valley, Washington researcher, writing agreed with Webre's analysis that earthquakes can be triggered by electromagnetic EM warfare. He
stated, "Like the weather and the oceans, the mantle beneath the floating tectonic plates also involve convection cells, but in a plastic
medium that sets up wave patterns that may be modified by superimposition of additional waves."
Electromagnetic (EM) weapons can possibly trigger cataclysmic earth events. EM fields can superheat the ionosphere, devastating magnetic bands around the earth, and in turn causing massive disruption of the earth’s Tectonic plates. A January 17, 1995
earthquake in Kobe, Japan may have been triggered by clandestine deployment of EM weapons. EM strategic warfare includes weather, climate and earth event warfare. Researchers have reported the use of EM weapons in anti-population mind-control
operations over major cities.
Scientific observers and short wave radio operators now state that unusual electromagnetic (EM) broadcasts preceded the Seattle- Vancouver earthquake. One researcher who actually monitored the
EM broadcasts prior to the earthquake states, "Could the abnormal activity on 3.39 MHz February 20 and prior be linked to the Seattle quake? If so, why would HAARP (supposedly funded by U.S. sources) be used to create quakes or other assorted EM mayhem
on U.S. property? I picked up a signal so strong it went right off the S meter on my SW set at that frequency at 6:00 am on Feb 20th.
Took an audio sampling of half an hour but can't make hide or hair of what HAARP is broadcasting, just that it's STRONG."
One example of how earthquakes (and climate shift including so-called global warming) can be triggered is HAARP, a U.S. military electromagnetic EM installation located in Alaska, and part of a
global network of U.S. (and other nations') military electromagnetic weapons. HAARP and its EM network are designed to turn the entire ionosphere into a giant anti-submarine and anti-missile antenna.
Environmental impact studies show that HAARP - and EM
environmental weapons deployed secretly by many nations - could superheat the ionosphere, and substantially damage or destroy it in a runaway ecological process.
Seattle-based researcher Kent Steadman notes EM activity just prior to and during the earthquake. "COINCIDENCE? Date:
2/27/01 9:54:34 PM Pacific Standard Time [hour prior to quake] . Washington, Yakima Valley: On the dial at WX Air VHF band around 153 we are getting the strangest signal. Anyone else hearing it or no what it is. HAARP maybe?"
Steadman continues, "Date: 2/28/01 7:21:39 PM Pacific Standard Time. Does anyone have recording of 153 MHZ signal? I helped install seismic monitoring stations in California in early 90's. They are designed as early warning system in detecting earth movements prior to big quake. Several of these were in the 153-154 band. They send data, but during a big shift they send a screeching sounding data burst. Let me know what you find out."
Ominously, two earthquakes along the North American-South American Pacific Rim occurred just following the electromagnetic EM environmental war signals - The Seattle-Vancouver earthquake, and an earthquake off Central America. Were these triggered by the same signals? The director of the ELFRAD group that
monitors EM electromagnetic activity, including HAARP and other EM weapons writes, "Date: 2/28/01 1:55:52 PM Pacific Standard Time. Thought you might find this file interesting. It is a 21-hour
recording starting this morning at 0001 hrs. We recorded intense activity from .02 to .036 hertz 473 minutes prior to the Washington quake. Actually this was a double boomer, because 4 minutes earlier there was also a quake registering 5.4 off the coast
of Central America. Also am including a [picture] during the same time period for yesterday so that you can compare with no major quake."
Faced with the information on EM Environmental war and
earthquakes, another researcher with the ELFRAD group wrote, "I take back my former statement that all earthquakes are natural. After reading the following article and tying this information in with
Russian predictions of major earthquakes in Kamchatka this year, I'm ready to believe we're in for a lot of trouble..." The researcher then cites environmental war analysis also covered in EARTH
CHANGES on possible tectonic warfare earthquakes: www.cheniere.org/misc/brightskies1.htm
Other researchers have found that the HAARP electromagnetic (EM) signal is carrying within it another hidden signal, whose frequency has been shown to affect the limbic system in the human brain, which manages emotions and mood and is a target of
mind control intrusions. Some researchers have stated that mood management of human populations may be happening through these hidden EM frequencies. On February 17, just 11 days prior to the Seattle earthquake, according to ELFRAD".9 Hz signal,
which as we've discussed, may be related to limbic (emotion) activation in the brain, occurred during the transmission, lasting a very unusual 42 minutes from 1200 hrs to 1400 hrs UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) on Saturday, 17 Feb 2001."
During the 1990s, the US Congress held hearings on HAARP's environmental impact statement. Former Congressman Ronald V. Dellums (D-Calif) strenuously objected to giving HAARP a Congressional go-ahead. HAARP's environmental impact statement showed that possible environmental mishaps like the
Seattle-Vancouver earthquake might result. Despite these obvious large-scale hazards, the U.S. Navy then insisted that HAARP's electromagnetic (EM) broadcasts were safe and would not produce runaway tectonic or atmospheric impacts.
If the Seattle-Vancouver earthquake is in any way shown to have been affected by HAARP broadcasts - accidentally or intentionally -
the environmental, social, and political consequences to the U.S. environmental EM war programs will be profound. These include incalculable domestic consequences for the U.S. Navy and the
Bush Administration's plans for an expansion of electromagnetic EM weapons systems. In addition, HAARP's negative environmental impacts are of such an unprecedented scale that they would constitute blatant violations of the 1977 United Nations
Treaty against Environmental Modification. Blatant U.S. violations of this treaty could result in a major embarrassment and isolation of the United States in the world community.
EcoNews has published a series of award winning articles on the HAARP environmental impact statements by Earth Island, an environmental think tank.
Author Webre also interprets seismic events like the Seattle-Vancouver earthquake in a startling new light of Environmental War and Global Earthquakes. Writing in EARTH CHANGES, Webre analyzes tectonic and environmental warfare through the disciplines of catastrophic geology, seismology, vulcanology,
parapsychology, and public interest policy analysis. Webre has developed a new field theory explaining how an age of global earthquakes might be fulfilled – not by earth system mechanics, but by the deployment of a new generation of electromagnetic weapons, used in environmental warfare.
EARTH CHANGES includes leading edge alternative science in, and integrates the prophetic traditions of many cultures with modern science. Prophetic traditions, ranging from the Mayan calendar, to indigenous Native- American-First Nations prophecy
converges on cataclysmic earth changes accompanying a
transition of earth into a millennial society. Analysis of the written precognition of psychics such as Edgar Cayce and Michel de Notredame (1503-1566) reveals that "terrible new weapons," with
characteristics similar to EM environmental weapons, may have caused the cataclysmic earth changes. The Mayan calendar, which divides time into galactic-based long cycles or tuns of 26,000 years, predicts that the galactic tun-cycle ending on December 22, 2012, may be accompanied by catastrophic earth changes, as well as initiation of cosmic consciousness among
humankind.
Author Alfred Webre, a Yale Law School graduate, is a former member of the Governor's Emergency Task Force on Earthquake Preparedness, State of California, and author of a classic work on Earth Changes, THE AGE OF CATACLYSM (G.P. Putnam's Sons 1974).
Read EARTH CHANGES at:
www.universebooks.com/sam...anges.html
EcoNews Service
Econews@ecologynews.com www.ecologynews.com
Copyright 2001
=====
_________
EcoNews Service - Ecology, Consciousness & Universe Exopolitics www.ecologynews.com/ mailto:econews@ecologynews.com
1512 West 40 Ave. Vancouver, BC V6M 1V8
Tel: 604-733-8134 Fax:604-733-8135
geri destefano, phd alfred lambremont webre, jd, med |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Tue May 22, 2012 5:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
