|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
Blood for Oil
 Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:05 pm
|
 |
|
BLOOD FOR OIL...THE PROTESTERS WERE RIGHT.
Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil
George Wright
Wednesday June 4, 2003
Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a leading White House hawk has claimed, confirming the worst fears of those opposed to the US-led war.
The US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz - who has already undermined Tony Blair's position over weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by describing them as a "bureaucratic" excuse for war - has now gone further by claiming the real motive was that Iraq is "swimming" in oil.
The latest comments were made by Mr Wolfowitz in an address to delegates at an Asian security summit in Singapore at the weekend, and reported today by German newspapers Der Tagesspiegel and Die Welt.
Asked why a nuclear power such as North Korea was being treated differently from Iraq, where hardly any weapons of mass destruction had been found, the deputy defence minister said: "Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil."
Mr Wolfowitz went on to tell journalists at the conference that the US was set on a path of negotiation to help defuse tensions between North Korea and its neighbours - in contrast to the more belligerent attitude the Bush administration displayed in its dealings with Iraq.
His latest comments follow his widely reported statement from an interview in Vanity Fair last month, in which he said that "for reasons that have a lot to do with the US government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on: weapons of mass destruction."
Prior to that, his boss, defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld, had already undermined the British government's position by saying Saddam Hussein may have destroyed his banned weapons before the war.
Mr Wolfowitz's frank assessment of the importance of oil could not come at a worse time for the US and UK governments, which are both facing fierce criticism at home and abroad over allegations that they exaggerated the threat posed by Saddam Hussein in order to justify the war.
Amid growing calls from all parties for a public inquiry, the foreign affairs select committee announced last night it would investigate claims that the UK government misled the country over its evidence of Iraq's WMD.
The move is a major setback for Tony Blair, who had hoped to contain any inquiry within the intelligence and security committee, which meets in secret and reports to the prime minister.
In the US, the failure to find solid proof of chemical, biological and nuclear arms in Iraq has raised similar concerns over Mr Bush's justification for the war and prompted calls for congressional investigations.
Mr Wolfowitz is viewed as one of the most hawkish members of the Bush administration. The 57-year old expert in international relations was a strong advocate of military action against Afghanistan and Iraq.
Following the September 11 terror attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, Mr Wolfowitz pledged that the US would pursue terrorists and "end" states' harbouring or sponsoring of militants.
Prior to his appointment to the Bush cabinet in February 2001, Mr Wolfowitz was dean and professor of international relations at the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), of the Johns Hopkins University.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 06-04-2003] |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Thu Jun 05, 2003 12:01 am
|
|
|
Lets review the LIES of the BU$H Administration
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."
- Dick Cheney, August 26 2002
"If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world."
- Ari Fleischer, December 2 2002
"We know for a fact that there are weapons there."
- Ari Fleischer, January 9 2003
"We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more."
- Colin Powell, February 5 2003
"Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly . . . all this will be made clear in the course of the operation, for whatever duration it takes."
- Ari Fleischer, March 21 2003
"There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. As this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them."
- Gen. Tommy Franks, March 22 2003
***************************************************************
"We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad."
- Donald Rumsfeld, March 30 2003
**********************************************************************
"I think you have always heard, and you continue to hear from officials, a measure of high confidence that, indeed, the weapons of mass destruction will be found."
- Ari Fleischer, April 10 2003
"There are people who in large measure have information that we need . . . so that we can track down the weapons of mass destruction in that country."
- Donald Rumsfeld, April 25 2003
"I am confident that we will find evidence that makes it clear he had weapons of mass destruction."
- Colin Powell, May 4 2003
***********************************************************************
"Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons."
- George W. Bush, September 12 2002
*****************************************************************************
"Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent."
- George W. Bush, State of the Union address, January 28 2003
"We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have."
- George Bush, February 8 2003
"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
- George Bush, March 17 2003
"We are learning more as we interrogate or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some, perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find them."
- George Bush, April 24 2003
"We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so."
- George Bush, May 3 2003
***************************************************************************
"I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons program."
- George W. Bush, May 6 2003
HAD?
******************************************************************************
BLOOD FOR OIL
|
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 11:13 am
|
|
|
.. |
| |
|
|
Feelin Kocky
Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Location: Underground Weather Control Bunker |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 11:26 am
|
|
|
Maybe after all the mideast oil is pumped out, they will finally be insignificant and we can get on with life. The sooner the better.
F.K. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 12:24 pm
|
|
|
Why thank you FK. You have just proved to me that people who supported this war didn't give a rats ass about the people living there or the troops who had to fight Bu$hs war.
Much less the REASON why we went.
Proves it very nicely. |
| |
|
|
Feelin Kocky
Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Location: Underground Weather Control Bunker |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 1:05 pm
|
|
|
You missed my point, mech. Not the first time for that.
F.K. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:43 pm
|
|
|
blood for oil blood for land blood for blood...
give blood...
oil was just one of the reasons...since when did you become an evironmentalist whacko mech ?
 |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:50 pm
|
|
|
It has nothing to do with being an "environmentalist". it has to do with being against EMPIRE and killing for money.
Bu$h and crew lied.
The protesters were right. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:19 pm
|
|
|
no they were wrong...
but hypothetically have you ever thought that for whatever reason, if saddam was not removed and a new presence establish in the gulf...that bad things may have happened here ?
whether it be terrorism or the saudis holding us hostage in another oil crisis ? |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:41 pm
|
|
|
I quote the biggest NWO minion on TV news today.........
"And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again."
---Fox News's Bill O'Reilly, on Good Morning America, March 18
Oh REALLY Bill? |
| |
|
|
rainheart
Joined: 03 Oct 2001
Posts: 175
|
|
Sun Jun 08, 2003 5:07 am
|
|
|
NO DOUBT!
as if anyone with half a wit couldn't see that oil was one of the major factors that determined US invasion of Iraq.
It would be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic, that there are still people unable to see what is going on.
News like this is so anti-climactic, like, no kidding. But the real scary part is when it starts to become commonplace and justified to kill in the name of greed. The hits just keep on coming, cripes sake, I'm still reeling over the bogus (s)election, not to mention 911, Afghanistan, Patriot Act (s), War on Terrorism, Iraq, Homeland Security, various weapons treaties, etc etc.
i keep thinking 'OK, for sure now, they'll never get away with this one' WTF is it gonna take before we shed these shackles?
really, if one thinks about it, we've been privy to the reasons behind war for centuries. It doesn't take a genius to figure out who the victims are and who the winners end up being.
the onlt thing that doesn't make sense is; if there is some grand plan to subvert the entire earth, how do tptb escape the ongoing ecological breakdown? |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sun Jun 08, 2003 5:48 am
|
|
|
I think this sums it up nicely..........
 |
| |
|
|
the professor
Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 1164
Location: heartland USA |
|
Sun Jun 08, 2003 6:58 am
|
|
|
Don't you mean republics? |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Wed May 23, 2012 11:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
