|
|
KNOW-THIS
Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
REMOVE THE CANCEROUS LUMP >>>>>>
 Sat Aug 02, 2003 12:25 am
|
 |
|
A PETITION
for
The Impeachment of George W. Bush
TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
WHEREAS George W. Bush essentially murdered 6000* of his own countrymen, by allowing terrorists, in the face of specific intelligence and warnings by domestic and foreign agents, to highjack jumbo jets and use them as bombs against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and,
WHEREAS George Bush thereby caused damage in the millions of dollars, first from the initial incident and subsequent cascade of consequences which fell primarily on the shoulders of working class people, while he bailed out his rich cronies, and,
WHEREAS George W. Bush then perpetrated an illegal war against the country of Afghanistan, killing thousands of innocent civilians, women and children, mostly from starvation and exposure, in a pretext of “making war against terrorism”, which was, in reality, a clandestine plot to install a puppet government and begin to extract the oil and heroin resources of the region, and,
WHEREAS George W. Bush has surreptitiously used the “terrorist” issue to suspend the Constitution of the United States, mainly through the USA PATRIOT Act, suspending the rights of habeas corpus, legal representation and lawyer-client privilege while increasing the use of eavesdropping, snooping and electronic surveillance furthering the draconian restrictions to personal freedoms characteristic of this illegal regime, and,
WHEREAS George W. Bush has telegraphed his intention to withdraw from the family of man and the civilized global society by withdrawing from the ABM Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol and the World Court, preferring to pursue a course of world and space domination,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the People, Undersigned, being citizens of the United States and registered voters in the Counties and States so indicated, HEREBY Demand that the Congress of the United States begin immediate impeachment proceedings against said George W. Bush, pretender to the office of the President of the United States, and further demand they vigorously pursue all civil and criminal penalties to each and every member of this administration, agency employees, and members of the congress or intelligence apparatus who willingly and with malice aforethought participated in these heinous crimes.
*Footnote 1. These are official U.S. numbers. The death-toll at the World Trade Center was placed at 6,700 in September, 2001. The figures were used liberally by pundits and politicians alike to fuel the hunt for Osama bin Laden and the U.S. war on Afghanistan. The initial civilian death- toll from U.S. bombing in Afghanistan was 20 to 37. The U.S. death-toll was continually revised downward while world health officials elevated the Afghani casualties. The numbers became equal around June 2002. The present numbers are: U.S. deaths 2,919; Afghani deaths 3,215. So, George Bush’s body count remains nearly constant...the victims’ identities have changed. (for an excellent discussion, see Marc Herold at [url=http://www.cursor.org/stories/heroldon911.htm)]www.cursor.org/stories/heroldon911.htm)[/url]
*Footnote 2. Figures for Afghani deaths are from U.S. bombing alone. They do not include the thousand who died from starvation and exposure as a result of U.S. closure of relief supply routes from Azerbaijan and Pakistan.
|
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 12:30 am
|
|
|
I'll sign it!
 |
| |
|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:26 pm
|
|
|
You are both morons.. carry on. |
| |
|
|
KNOW-THIS
Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:30 pm
|
|
|
Someone who refers to himself as "chemcaptain" calling me a moron? I think you've been sniffing too many magic markers. You're about as valid as Captain Crunch. |
| |
|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:57 pm
|
|
|
CC- is there any chance of your actually posting some relevant information, your jay reynolds impression is becoming boring and ridicules.
Have you posted even one original thought since your time on this board or even a tiny bit of research information, no.
So far all we have seen is thread bashing and name calling on your part.
Remember, you are a guest here, and unruly guests can be asked to leave...
|
| |
|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 5:58 pm
|
|
|
Jeez, I'm under the heat today...
David, stay out of it, I always call Mech a moron.. It's like a standing joke. Mech can spit out insults back just as easy, I'm sure he can fight for himself.
And relevant information? Please David! Anything posted in these forums that goes remotely against what you guys believe is completely ignored, why should I take my time and bother to post something that is just going to be ignored?
Have you posted even one original thought since your time on this board or even a tiny bit of research information, no.
Don't be a liar David.. While I do my share of bashing and name calling (don't pretend you all don't!), a majority of my posts, are not.
I invite you to read all my posts Dave.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by ChemCaptain on 08-02-2003] |
| |
|
|
KNOW-THIS
Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 7:09 pm
|
|
|
When you bolt in to a thread from out of nowhere and call someone a moron, you should expect to be ignored. You should also prepare for some form of verbal retaliation. Don't take a swing at someone, if you can't take a punch in return. How can you tell David to "stay out of it", when you came along without an invitation as well? Not that either of you needed one, this is an open forum remember? You are free to come in and spout off, we are free to disregard you in return. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 8:04 pm
|
|
|
Thanks for the link!!
I just zapped numerous mailboxes and other forums. |
| |
|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 8:55 pm
|
|
|
The 'insult' was directed at Mech and KT, not David. My point was they have proven them selves quite able to defend them selves, so David need not come to the rescue.
Ignored? I expected it to be ignored! They (insults) often are. I'm sorry I saw what I felt to be a very stupid thread and commented on it, although I wasn't very smart in just calling you morons.. If I had the patience or will I would have actually commented on the content.
I honestly can't believe you guys are making such a big deal out of this... |
| |
|
|
KNOW-THIS
Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 9:57 pm
|
|
|
You didn't comment on it, you headed straight for the insults. This must means you never had anything worthy to say in the first place. Why bother? |
| |
|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
|
Sat Aug 02, 2003 11:33 pm
|
|
|
This must means you never had anything worthy to say in the first place. Why bother?
I agree. In future threads I will actually comment and then call them morons.
Kidding.... I will try not to just reply to a thread in such a way anymore. But with Mech-o-pal I just can't help it sometimes.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by ChemCaptain on 08-02-2003] |
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Sun Aug 03, 2003 8:57 am
|
|
|
Never apologize for stating the truth, Chem Captain....that's the mistake GW made. Mech and KT, are indeed morons...So is David..It's a very relevent and highly accurate statement which can be backed up with 100s of pages of evidence. Actually, in Mech's case, moron gives him a bit too much credit. Mech is actually an idiot...which is a shade below moron...but Moron Mech has a better ring to it... |
| |
|
|
KNOW-THIS
Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
|
Sun Aug 03, 2003 10:11 pm
|
|
|
Published on Friday, August 1, 2003 by the Seattle Times
Bush's High Crimes Against the Nation
George W. Bush has knowingly deceived the American people on the two
overriding policy issues of his presidency — the invasion of Iraq and the deep tax
cuts.
Other presidents have lied. Only Bush has repeatedly duped Congress and the
public to thwart their exercise of informed consent.
He is the first president to use propaganda as the main weapon in selling his
policies. Bush's unprecedented pattern of deception may constitute an
impeachable offense.
To date, only the deception in Iraq has brought forth the "I" word. The case for
impeachment is materially strengthened, however, when Iraq is combined with
Bush's 2001 and 2003 propaganda campaigns to convince the public that tax filers
with lower levels of income benefited more from his tax cuts than the nation's
richest families.
Hoodwinking the public that Saddam posed a perilous immediate danger to the
United States is Bush's greatest treachery. New York Times columnist Paul
Krugman observed: "If that claim was fraudulent, the selling of the war is arguably
the worst scandal in American history."
John Dean, counsel to the president during Watergate, wrote in mid-June:
"Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven,
could be a 'high crime' under the Constitution's impeachment clause."
Before the U.S. invasion, the strong consensus based on intelligence community
information held that there were only negligible Iraqi ties with al-Qaida, no nuclear
weapons program of any consequence, and limited chemical and biological
weapons programs at most.
Lacking hard facts, as evidenced by his now much-discussed deception in his
State of the Union address that Iraq sought to buy uranium in Africa, Bush mixed
misinformation, distorted allegations and unsubstantiated rumors to persuade the
public of the imminent danger posed by Saddam Hussein.
The experience with the massive tax cuts for families and individuals in both 2001
and 2003 makes patently clear how Bush used the same unscrupulous tactics over
time. Moreover, the level of the deception is staggering, as indicated by Bush's
2003 proposal to eliminate taxes on taxable corporate dividends.
Joel Friedman and Robert Greenstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
pointed out: "The group with incomes over $1 million — which consists of about
226,000 tax filers in 2003 — would receive roughly as much in benefits as the 127
million tax filers with income below $140,000. Stated another way, the top 0.2
percent of tax filers would receive nearly as much from the tax cut as the bottom 95
percent of filers combined."
|
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Wed May 23, 2012 11:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
