|
|
penumbra
Joined: 24 Apr 2001
Posts: 672
Location: North Carolina |
 Sat Jun 02, 2001 2:17 am
|
 |
|
Interesting to note the Unitd Nations connection. |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
|
Sat Jun 02, 2001 5:20 am
|
|
|
U.N? That is interesting.
I took a quick look, penumbra, and didn't see it. Where to look? |
| |
|
|
penumbra
Joined: 24 Apr 2001
Posts: 672
Location: North Carolina |
|
Sat Jun 02, 2001 11:58 am
|
|
|
It was under the BackgroundPaper. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.html
I couldn't figure out how to link it. ( Too early  ) I just think it's interesting that the U.N. would oversee world-wide radio frequencies.
"Proposals to change international spectrum allocations frequently have a direct impact on U.S. domestic spectrum policies, and it is critical that this impact be clearly presented in international meetings where such proposals are addressed. This spectrum chart provides US delegates the opportunity to present to our international neighbors the U.S. domestic spectrum policies that provide the basis for our positions on given proposals.
The ITU is a specialized organizational element of the United Nations that is responsible for establishing international standards and procedures designed to facilitate cooperation between administrations. The ITU radio regulations are established by decisions reached at World Radiocommunication Conferences (WRCs). WRC 92, WRC 95, WRC 97, and WRC 2000 were the most recent conferences where major spectrum allocations decisions were reached. The 1996 spectrum chart reflects those decisions reached at WRC 92 that have been implemented by the NTIA and the FCC for radio services operated in the United States. Work is being planned to update the 1996 chart; however, this work is not expected to be completed before mid-2001."
[Edited 1 times, lastly by penumbra on 06-02-2001] |
| |
|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
|
Sat Jun 02, 2001 3:25 pm
|
|
|
Hi, all. I'm back. An addiction to the Internet is a terrible thing. 
Thermit, I was hoping somebody else would ask this so I wouldn't have to.
Why did you post the US Frequency Allocation Chart
and then post nsasucks' frequency submissions
and then post the "Chemplane Communication" thread w/frequencies references?
I'm not seeing the connection you're making. Could you please explain? (Duh.) Thanks!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by 3T3L1 on 06-02-2001] |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
|
Sat Jun 02, 2001 4:18 pm
|
|
|
Thanks penumba.
3T3L1, I thought the chart was cool. And those that might be interested in trying to listen in on some Chemplanes, might find this information useful. Just trying to tie it together for future reference. |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Jun 03, 2001 12:30 am
|
|
|
Anyone know of a web-based application for monitoring these frequencies? |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Wed May 23, 2012 12:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
