|
|
FLKook
Joined: 28 Apr 2001
Posts: 710
Location: East Central Florida |
Research Exexutive Orders
 Mon Oct 27, 2003 1:05 am
|
 |
|
Most of the orders themselves are in pdf format so you'll have to download them to read them.
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/executive_orders/disposition_tables.html
Executive Orders Disposition Tables
January 8, 1937 – September 25, 2003
Learn More About Executive Orders And About These Tables
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
George W. Bush (2001-Present)
EO's 13198- 13317 | Subject Index
William J. Clinton (1993-2001)
EO's 12834-13197 | Subject Index
George Bush (1989-1993)
EO's 12668-12833
Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)
EO's 12287-12667
Jimmy Carter (1977-1981)
EO's 11967-12286
Gerald R. Ford (1974-1977)
EO's 11798-11966
Richard Nixon (1969-1974)
EO's 11452-11797
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)
EO's 11128-11451
John F. Kennedy (1961-1963)
EO's 10914-11127
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961)
EO's 10432-10913
Harry S. Truman (1945-1953)
EO's 9538-10431
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-1945)
EO's 6071-9537
Herbert Hoover (1929-1933)
EO's 5075-6070
1,011 EO's issued
From http://www.seebo.net/
What are Presidential Executive Orders?
In Short they are dictatorial powers provided to the President, and were originally intended to be used in national emergency situations such as war. They are actually illegal because they bypass the constitutional requirements to pass laws through congressional approval only. Executive orders are simply filed in the Federal Register by the President and after 30 days they become law just as though they had been passed by congress.
Bill Clinton has been quoted as stating in his first campaign bid for the presidency that If elected I will govern by executive order. He has kept his word by implementing more American sovereignty-threatening orders than any president! Several of his Executive Orders (PDD's)have been sealed and the actual contents are not even known by Congress!
By the Way, All Executive Orders, Presidential Decision Directives, Presidential Proclamations, Presidential Declarations and Treaties are considered executive orders when they are instituted by the President without the authority or approval of Congress. Unfortunately many of these orders are secretive and some have been withheld and even removed from the federal register. Others are only published in part. For example, in the case of Clinton's PDD # 25, even members of the Congress and Senate have been denied access to it's complete text. This is the order that places the U.S. Military under United Nations authority.
Here is a partial list of some of the original executive orders that the President John F. Kennedy instituted. These orders placed unprecedented authority at the president's disposal, that he can enforce during a national crises. He can declare a national crises or emergency for any reason he deems necessary, whether the American people or congress like it or not. These orders give the president the powers of an absolute dictator and the right to practice total tyranny over the population of this nation. He would have complete control of the armed services to enforce these E.O.'s. Here is the partial list of executive orders and the authority each gave the president:
Executive Orders:
10995: Right to seize all communications media in the United States.
10997: Right to seize all electric power, fuels and minerals, both public and private.
10999: Right to seize all means of transportation, including personal vehicles of any kind and total control of highways, seaports and waterways.
11000: Right to seize any and all American people and divide up families in order to create work forces to be transferred to any place the gov. sees fit.
11001: Right to seize all health, education and welfare facilities, both public and private.
11002: Right to force registration of all men, women and children in the United States.
11003: Right to seize all air space, airports and aircraft.
11004: Right to seize all housing and finance authorities in order to establish "Relocation Designated Areas" and to force abandonment of areas classified as "unsafe".
11005: Right to seize all railroads, inland waterways, and storage facilities, both public and private.
Even though the above listed E.O's, authored by President John Kennedy, have been revoked and\or amended at least ten times, their content has remained alive and well under subsquent E.O.'s. Nixon revoked most of the above E.O.'s, but then replaced them with E.O. 11490, which still gave the federal government powerful tools to institute martial law. E.O. 11490 was later revoked and replaced by Ronald Reagan's E.O.'s 12656 and 12657, which gave FEMA (Federal Emergency Mangement Agency) even more power than they had already received from Jimmy Carter's E.O. 12148. George Bush extended FEMA's Powers even more by giving them control of all the disaster and "emergency" functions.
With all these at his disposal, Bill Clinton added E.O. 12919 to the mix in 1994 giving him a full arsenal of E.O.'s to allow him (with FEMA at the helm) to have all the laws and operating guidlines in place to implement a horrendously intrusive and dictatorial state of martial law on the citizens of the U.SA. He can do this as a result of virtually anything he alone decides constitutes a national emergency.
Note: The Constituion was suspended on March 9th 1933, when President Franklin D. Roosecelt declared a state of national emergency and was granted a broad range of executive powers by congress to deal with the Great Depression under the War Powers Act of 1917. No president since then has ordered a proclamation ending the the national emergency. It still exists and the Constiution remains suspended, when national emergencies or wars are declared, allowing presidential executive powers to go unchecked. This also means that the president can declare a national emergency and order martial law at anytime!
Another note: All executive orders, whether revoked or amended, are supposed to remain listed in the Federal Resister. However, for some strange reason the text of Bill Clinton's "Federalism" E.O. 13083 signed in 1998 mysteriously vanished from the Register! After being exposed for what it was, an executive order that would essentially seize and federally centralize the powers of all the states, this order was later suspended (not revoked).
Because the White House Government site doesn't keep the text of E.O.'s further back than 1993, I suggest using the following House of Representatives site to search for older executive orders: http://uscode.house.gov/uschelp.htm#exec
This is the site of the Federal Register. It will show you a list of executive orders beginning with JFK, but it is difficult to locate the texts of EO's at this site: http://www.nara.gov/fedreg/eo.html#top
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 04-26-2004] |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Mon Oct 27, 2003 1:45 am
|
|
|
Great resource.
Thanks Kook |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Mon Apr 26, 2004 11:00 am
|
|
|
Flashback....
EVERYONE...who is AWAKE.
Read the ABOVE HIGHLIGHTED executive orders.
|
| |
|
|
shatoga
Joined: 23 Nov 2002
Posts: 1291
|
|
Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:21 am
|
|
|
that's the web addy I cited with every reference to Clinton's Executive Orders titled "Federalism"
Such a shame the EO of 1998 which ordered "all agencies of the executive branch to obey the Constitution in all actions and in all regulation" is missing.
One might also note that a great many of our dear Shrubya's EO's are not available.
Despite all the boy crying wolf fears about Clinton,
It is Bush who has suspended the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Clinton haters would argue with a signpost.
President Bill Clinton signed several Executive Orders on "Federalism" (after Reno's debacle at WACO)
eg:
>Executive Order 13132--Federalism
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and
the laws of the United States of America, and in order to guarantee the
division of governmental responsibilities between the national
government and the States that was intended by the Framers of the
Constitution, to ensure that the principles of federalism established by
the Framers guide the executive departments and agencies in the
formulation and implementation of policies,...Sec. 2. Fundamental Federalism Principles.
In formulating and
implementing policies that have federalism implications,
agencies shall
be guided by the following fundamental federalism principles:
(a) Federalism is rooted in the belief that issues that are not
national in scope or significance are most appropriately addressed by
the level of government closest to the people.
(b) The people of the States created the national government and
delegated to it enumerated governmental powers. All other sovereign
powers, save those expressly prohibited the States by the Constitution,
are reserved to the States or to the people.
(c) The constitutional relationship among sovereign governments,
State and national, is inherent in the very structure of the
Constitution and is formalized in and protected by the Tenth Amendment
to the Constitution.
(d) The people of the States are free, subject only to restrictions
in the Constitution itself or in constitutionally authorized Acts of Congress, to define the
moral, political, and legal character of their lives.
(e) The Framers recognized that the States possess unique
authorities, qualities, and abilities to meet the needs of the people
and should function as laboratories of democracy.
(f) The nature of our constitutional system encourages a healthy
diversity in the public policies adopted by the people of the several
States according to their own conditions, needs, and desires. In the
search for enlightened public policy, individual States and communities
are free to experiment with a variety of approaches to public issues.
One-size-fits-all approaches to public policy problems can inhibit the
creation of effective solutions to those problems.
(g) Acts of the national government--whether legislative, executive,
or judicial in nature--that exceed the enumerated powers of that
government under the Constitution violate the principle of federalism
established by the Framers....
<
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html
In addition:
Executive Order 12886:
>Section 1. Statement of Regulatory Philosophy and Principles. (a)
The Regulatory Philosophy. Federal agencies should promulgate only such
regulations as are required by law, are necessary to interpret the law,
or are made necessary by compelling public need,...In deciding whether and how to regulate, agencies should assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, including
the alternative of not regulating.<
>In addition, as appropriate, agencies shall seek to
harmonize Federal regulatory actions with related State, local, and
tribal regulatory and other governmental functions.
(10) Each agency shall avoid regulations that are inconsistent,
incompatible, or duplicative with its other regulations or those of
other Federal agencies.
(11) Each agency shall tailor its regulations to impose the least
burden on society, including individuals, businesses of differing sizes,
and other entities <
===============================================================================
=============================================================================== http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=592531317 68+1+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents] From the 1999 Presidential Documents Online via GPO Access [frwais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID d09au99_txt-19] [Page 1557-1561] Monday, August 9, 1999 Volume 35--Number 31 Pages 1529-1576 Week Ending Friday, August 6, 1999 Executive Order 13132--Federalism August 4, 1999 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to guarantee the division of governmental responsibilities between the national government and the States that was intended by the Framers of the Constitution, to ensure that the principles of federalism established by the Framers guide the executive departments and agencies in the formulation and implementation of policies, and to further the policies of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order: (a) ``Policies that have federalism implications'' refers to regulations, legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. (b) ``State'' or ``States'' refer to the States of the United States of America, individually or collectively, and, where relevant, to State governments, including units of local government and other political subdivisions established by the States. (c) ``Agency'' means any authority of the United States that is an ``agency'' under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5). (d) ``State and local officials'' means elected officials of State and local governments or their representative national organizations. Sec. 2. Fundamental Federalism Principles. In formulating and implementing policies that have federalism implications, agencies shall be guided by the following fundamental federalism principles: (a) Federalism is rooted in the belief that issues that are not national in scope or significance are most appropriately addressed by the level of government closest to the people. (b) The people of the States created the national government and delegated to it enumerated governmental powers. All other sovereign powers, save those expressly prohibited the States by the Constitution, are reserved to the States or to the people. (c) The constitutional relationship among sovereign governments, State and national, is inherent in the very structure of the Constitution and is formalized in and protected by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. (d) The people of the States are free, subject only to restrictions in the Constitution [[Page 1558]] itself or in constitutionally authorized Acts of Congress, to define the moral, political, and legal character of their lives. (e) The Framers recognized that the States possess unique authorities, qualities, and abilities to meet the needs of the people and should function as laboratories of democracy. (f) The nature of our constitutional system encourages a healthy diversity in the public policies adopted by the people of the several States according to their own conditions, needs, and desires. In the search for enlightened public policy, individual States and communities are free to experiment with a variety of approaches to public issues. One-size-fits-all approaches to public policy problems can inhibit the creation of effective solutions to those problems. (g) Acts of the national government--whether legislative, executive, or judicial in nature--that exceed the enumerated powers of that government under the Constitution violate the principle of federalism established by the Framers. (h) Policies of the national government should recognize the responsibility of--and should encourage opportunities for--individuals, families, neighborhoods, local governments, and private associations to achieve their personal, social, and economic objectives through cooperative effort. (i) The national government should be deferential to the States when taking action that affects the policymaking discretion of the States and should act only with the greatest caution where State or local governments have identified uncertainties regarding the constitutional or statutory authority of the national government. Sec. 3. Federalism Policymaking Criteria. In addition to adhering to the fundamental federalism principles set forth in section 2, agencies shall adhere, to the extent permitted by law, to the following criteria when formulating and implementing policies that have federalism implications; (a) There shall be strict adherence to constitutional principles. Agencies shall closely examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and shall carefully assess the necessity for such action. To the extent practicable, State and local officials shall be consulted before any such action is implemented. Executive Order 12372 of July 14, 1982 (``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs'') remains in effect for the programs and activities to which it is applicable. (b) National action limiting the policymaking discretion of the States shall be taken only where there is constitutional and statutory authority for the action and the national activity is appropriate in light of the presence of a problem of national significance. Where there are significant uncertainties as to whether nation action is authorized or appropriate, agencies shall consult with appropriate State and local officials to determine whether Federal objectives can be attained by other means. (c) With respect to Federal statutes and regulations administered by the States, the national government shall grant the States the maximum administrative discretion possible. Intrusive Federal oversight of State administration is neither necessary nor desirable. (d) When undertaking to formulate and implement policies that have federalism implications, agencies shall: (1) encourage States to develop their own policies to achieve program objectives and to work with appropriate officials in other States; (2) where possible, defer to the States to establish standards; (3) in determining whether to establish uniform national standards, consult with appropriate State and local officials as to the need for national standards and any alternatives that would limit the scope of national standards or otherwise preserve State prerogatives and authority; and (4) where national standards are required by Federal statutes, consult with appropriate State and local officials in developing those standards. Sec. 4. Special Requirements for Preemption. Agencies, in taking action that preempts State law, shall act in strict accordance with governing law. (a) Agencies shall construe, in regulations and otherwise, a Federal statute to preempt State law only where the statute contains an [[Page 1559]] express preemption provision or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the Federal statute. (b) Where a Federal statute does not preempt State law (as addressed in subsection (a) of this section), agencies shall construe any authorization in the statute for the issuance of regulations as authorizing preemption of State law by rulemaking only when the exercise of State authority directly conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the Federal statute or there is clear evidence to conclude that the Congress intended the agency to have the authority to preempt State law. (c) Any regulatory preemption of State law shall be restricted to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the statute pursuant to which the regulations are promulgated. (d) When an agency foresees the possibility of a conflict between State law and Federally protected interests within its area of regulatory responsibility, the agency shall consult, to the extent practicable, with appropriate State and local officials in an effort to avoid such a conflict. (e) When an agency proposes to act through adjudication or rulemaking to preempt State law, the agency shall provide all affected State and local officials notice and an opportunity for appropriate participation in the proceedings. Sec. 5. Special Requirements for Legislative Proposals. Agencies shall not submit to the Congress legislation that would: (a) directly regulate the States in ways that would either interfere with functions essential to the States' separate and independent existence or be inconsistent with the fundamental federalism principles in section 2; (b) attach to Federal grants conditions that are not reasonably related to the purpose of the grant; or (c) preempt State law, unless preemption is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles set forth in section 2, and unless a clearly legitimate national purpose, consistent with the federalism policymaking criteria set forth in section 3, cannot otherwise be met. Sec. 6. Consultation. (a) Each agency shall have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications. Within 90 days after the effective date of this order, the head of each agency shall designate an official with principal responsibility for the agency's implementation of this order and that designated official shall submit to the Office of Management and Budget a description of the agency's consultation process. (b) To the extent practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promulgate any regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments, and that is not required by statute, unless: (1) funds necessary to pay the direct costs incurred by the State and local governments in complying with the regulation are provided by the Federal Government; or (2) the agency, prior to the formal promulgation of the regulation, (A) consulted with State and local officials early in the process of developing the proposed regulation; (B) in a separately identified portion of the preamble to the regulation as it is to be issued in the Federal Register, provides to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget a federalism summary impact statement, which consists of a description of the extent of the agency's prior consultation with State and local officials, a summary of the nature of their concerns and the agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation, and a statement of the extent to which the concerns of State and local officials have been met; and (C) makes available to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget any written communications submitted to the agency by State and local officials. [[Page 1560]] (c) To the extent practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promulgate any regulation that has federalism implications and that preempts State law, unless the agency, prior to the formal promulgation of the regulation. (1) consulted with State and local officials early in the process of developing the proposal regulation; (2) in a separately identified portion of the preamble to the regulation as it is to be issued in the Federal Register, provides to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget a federalism summary impact statement, which consists of a description of the extent of the agency's prior consultation with State and local officials, a summary of the nature of their concerns and the agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation, and a statement of the extent to which the concerns of State and local officials have been met; and (3) makes available to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget any written communications submitted to the agency by State and local officials. Sec. 7. Increasing Flexibility for State and Local Waivers. (a) Agencies shall review the processes under which State and local governments apply for waivers of statutory and regulatory requirements and take appropriate steps to streamline those processes. (b) Each agency shall, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, consider any application by a State for a waiver of statutory or regulatory requirements in connection with any program administered by that agency with a general view toward increasing opportunities for utilizing flexible policy approaches at the State or local level in cases in which the proposed waiver is consistent with applicable Federal policy objectives and is otherwise appropriate. (c) Each agency shall, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, render a decision upon a complete application for a waiver within 120 days of receipt of such application by the agency. If the application for a waiver is not granted, the agency shall provide the applicant with timely written notice of the decision and the reasons therefor. (d) This section applies only to statutory or regulatory requirements that are discretionary and subject to waiver by the agency. Sec. 8. Accountability. (a) In transmitting any draft final regulation that has federalism implications to the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993, each agency shall include a certification from the official designated to ensure compliance with this order stating that the requirements of this order have been met in a meaningful and timely manner. (b) In transmitting proposed legislation that has federalism implications to the Office of Management and Budget, each agency shall include a certification from the official designated to ensure compliance with this order that all relevant requirements of this order have been met. (c) Within 180 days after the effective date of this order, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs shall confer with State and local officials to ensure that this order is being properly and effectively implemented. Sec. 9. Independent Agencies. Independent regulatory agencies are encouraged to comply with the provisions of this order. Sec. 10. General Provisions. (a) This order shall supplement but not supersede the requirements contained in Executive Order 12372 (``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs''), Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review''), Executive Order 12988 (``Civil Justice Reform''), and OMB Circular A-19. (b) Executive Order 12612 (``Federalism''), Executive Order 12875 (``Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership''), Executive Order 13083 (``Federalism''), and Executive Order 13095 (``Suspension of Executive Order 13083'') are revoked. (c) This order shall be effective 90 days after the date of this order. Sec. 11. Judicial Review. This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch, and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by [[Page 1561]] a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person. William J. Clinton The White House, August 4, 1999. [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 8:45 a.m., August 9, 1999] Note: This Executive order was released by the Office of the Press Secretary on August 5, and it was published in the Federal Register on August 10.
===============================================================================
Executive Order 13130 of July 14, 1999, was revoked on October 16, 2001.
Sec. 13. Revocation. Executive Order 12667 of January 18, 1989, is revoked. George W. Bush The White House, November 1, 2001.
===============================================================================
Note: the above excerpts were copied by me (by typing) directly from NARA, before the Bush Administration decided to limit access to Clinton's EO's that might show Clinton in a good light.
[b]Clinton (like Presidents before him) had FEMA dictatorial powers,
but he did not use them. Bush has used them!
Clinton was preparing for the disasters predicted (pole shift/asteroid impact/comet collision)at the end of the millineum.
At least read the above before continuing Clinton bashing.
It IS the Bush administration (not Bill Clinton) that currently holds thousands of people incommunicado, that spies on all phone calls, internet posts, IM's and e-mail,
in clear violation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
It was Bush that signed the USAPATRIOT Act into law. (not Bill Clinton)
[Edited 2 times, lastly by shatoga on 04-28-2004] |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu May 24, 2012 1:55 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
