|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
NEW RESEARCH
 Thu Jun 28, 2001 7:13 pm
|
 |
|
toxdoc has just completed a set of experiments, and I have just finished writing them up.
The study is called Effect of Methodology and Elapsed Time on pH Value Obtained for a Sample of Rainwater.
Our work can be found at http://3t3l1.homestead.com/
[Edited 1 times, lastly by 3T3L1 on 06-28-2001] |
| |
|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
|
Thu Jun 28, 2001 7:16 pm
|
|
|
But, 3T3, how does this study relate to chemtrails? |
| |
|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
|
Thu Jun 28, 2001 7:32 pm
|
|
|
I'm glad you asked. Some of the data presented in other experiments has been obtained using methods which are inaccurate.
pH Test Alert
Rainfall pH Test Reports
pH Rainfall Plot
Drastic pH Changes
20 Times
We feel it is important for those studying the chemtrail phenomenon to be careful to use data which is reliable and reproducible.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by 3T3L1 on 06-28-2001] |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Thu Jun 28, 2001 9:20 pm
|
|
|
I think you've addressed this discrepancy in a most positive and professional manner, 3T3L1.
It is important for other parties to verify or refute these observations that have been made
I encourage you to post your finding at the Carnicom board. It will interesting to see what criticisms, if any, are directed towards this report.
Anonymity of the sources and inability to verify the credentials of the person doing the testing would be one cause for concern, as I am sure you are aware...  |
| |
|
|
Duncan Kunz
Joined: 19 Oct 2000
Posts: 582
|
|
Thu Jun 28, 2001 9:46 pm
|
|
|
Dear Colleague:
Many thanks for your outstanding work. I was not aware that either pH meters, papers, of solutions needed to be calibrated against the expected values to optimize the results; I doubt if many others did, either.
Hopefully, Mr. Carnicom's work will not be in vain; even if his measurements were flawed by the use of un-calibrated testing media, follow-up testing on his part will, at the very least, provide a further baseline for error.
It seems logical to me that, if we were to perform random pH measurements with properly-calibrated equipment and compare that to the corresponding NAPD data, then a close match of the data sets would confirm the overall accuracy and validity of the NADP data.
Once again, thank you and Mr. Toxdoc for your fine work.
Regards,
Duncan Kunz
duncan.kunz@prodigy.net
Mesa Arizona
480-891-2525 |
| |
|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
|
Fri Jun 29, 2001 3:47 pm
|
|
|
Fellow investigators:
I anticipate that, beginning with the pH study, the investigation of the chemtrail phenomenon will move closer to hard science.
Another area which needs to be addressed is the possibility that chemtrails contain red blood cells. http://www.carnicom.com/bio8.htm Although Clifford Carnicom has provided visual evidence that red blood cells may be present in air samples, this finding needs to be followed up with chemical tests for the presence of blood. I just learned that kits for this purpose are available to the general public at http://www.crime-scene.com/ecpi/serology_drug.html . Look under "Blood Tests" and "Presumptive Blood Test - Phenolphthalein."
[Edited 1 times, lastly by 3T3L1 on 06-29-2001] |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu May 24, 2012 2:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
