|
|
Duncan Kunz
Joined: 19 Oct 2000
Posts: 582
|
 Mon Oct 29, 2001 9:41 pm
|
 |
|
I hope not. That would have a chilling effect on some people here.
Regards,
------------------
Duncan Kunz / duncankunz@home.com
Mesa AZ / 480-891-2525 |
| |
|
|
amber
Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 445
Location: uk |
|
Tue Oct 30, 2001 9:40 pm
|
|
|
'I hope not. That would have a chilling effect on some people here.'
Not quite sure what you meant by this comment Duncan...are you implying that members of this board use the internet to manufacture hoaxes involving biological, chemical, radioactive or nuclear weapons????
[Edited 1 times, lastly by amber on 10-30-2001] |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3130
Location: Texas |
|
Tue Oct 30, 2001 10:31 pm
|
|
|
Well, since Chemtrails are not a hoax (and even if it were) there really is no issue with this board or it's members. However, those in the Chemtrail community that abuse the situation by calling the authorities to report Chemtrail spraying (or contrails) as biological attacks, do the issue a great disservice, as well as adding to the pile of false leads the authorities must investigate instead of actual terrorism and, finally, they also place themselves at risk of the severe punishments described above.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 10-30-2001] |
| |
|
|
Duncan Kunz
Joined: 19 Oct 2000
Posts: 582
|
|
Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:12 pm
|
|
|
Dear Amber:
My comment was that the very existence of such a law might keep people who might report persistent contrails as part of a 'plot' from doing so. These people might think that the government would consider such posts as a hoax and would go after them.
Whether or not they are a hoax, of course, would be irrelevant in the eyes of the beholder. A person might sincerely believe that such contrails are an attack by (fill in the blanks). Or, a person might sincerely believe that persistent contrails are okay but would want to call the government as a prank.
My personal opinion would be that the bulk of people who might report such considerations are in the former category, i.e., they do not believe that such a report is a hoax.
But it's the perception that the government has of such a report that could result in potential investigation and prosecution. My guess is that the bulk of people in government do consider it a hoax and would react strongly and negatively.
I don't think that's right. There is a difference between someone reporting what they think is true and someone reporting as a hoax. But the government is not liable to make such a distinction.
------------------
Duncan Kunz / duncankunz@home.com
Mesa AZ / 480-891-2525
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Duncan Kunz on 10-30-2001] |
| |
|
|
amber
Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 445
Location: uk |
|
Thu Nov 01, 2001 7:30 pm
|
|
|
I am a little confused...does hoaxing mean something different over there?
Surely, in order to hoax a chemtrail - one would have to get in a plane, release a harmless chemical and then call the authorities to tell them you were releasing a biological weapon?
You can't hoax a chemtrail by reporting one, or seeing one, or posting a sighting on a board. Unless you have dumb laws.
You can kill dissent or investigation or the truth coming out by invoking such a law. |
| |
|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
|
Thu Nov 01, 2001 7:44 pm
|
|
|
You can kill dissent or investigation or the truth coming out by invoking such a law.
I think that's the warning Duncan was giving us. And that's something I'm worried about, too. Daring to suggest that "normal contrails" are actually chemtrails could be labeled by the government as terrorist hoaxing. (They would maintain that just because they've sprayed us with dangerous materials before, it couldn't possibly mean that that they might be spraying us with dangerous material now.) A good way to turn an inquisitive populace into unquestioning sheeple, no? |
| |
|
|
amber
Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 445
Location: uk |
|
Thu Nov 01, 2001 8:33 pm
|
|
|
yes!......God, I'm really starting to get depressed  |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3130
Location: Texas |
|
Thu Nov 01, 2001 9:03 pm
|
|
|
I don't think there is any worry, unless some of us get a little overexcited and frantically call the FBI with our Chemtrail reports, attempting to gain extra attention. Don't get me wrong there will be extra attention, just not good... |
| |
|
|
amber
Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 445
Location: uk |
|
Thu Nov 01, 2001 9:14 pm
|
|
|
Putting my cynical head on Thermit..it would only take a few agents provocateurs to make a few calls...for the axe to fall...And after they carted us all off...Ducnan would be the only one left one the board  eek
[Edited 2 times, lastly by amber on 11-01-2001] |
| |
|
|
3T3L1
Joined: 08 Mar 2001
Posts: 1344
Location: Lubbock, Texas |
|
Thu Nov 01, 2001 9:32 pm
|
|
|
A board with only Duncan on it! The mind finds itself unable to comprehend the range of possible outcomes.  |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
