Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
New Here

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > CT Science

Author Thread
halva





Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 510
Location: Greece
PostMon Aug 18, 2003 3:18 pm  Reply with quote  

No loss at all. Your knowledge, whose validity I cannot judge, is useless to me.
That is something I know.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
ChemCaptain





Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States
PostMon Aug 18, 2003 6:33 pm  Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by halva:
No loss at all. Your knowledge, whose validity I cannot judge, is useless to me.
That is something I know.



It's only useless to you because you refuse to listen to anything that questions your belief in chemtrails.

Sorry Havla, that's how it goes.

 View user's profile Send private message
Feelin Kocky





Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Location: Underground Weather Control Bunker
PostMon Aug 18, 2003 9:15 pm  Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by halva:
No loss at all. Your knowledge, whose validity I cannot judge, is useless to me.
That is something I know.



But you believe some anonymous guy who "claims" to be an "insider." A guy who doesn't no jack shit about weather or climate. You are funny.


F.K.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
halva





Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 510
Location: Greece
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 4:15 pm  Reply with quote  

Telling me you don't understand again Kokky?
One difference between you and me is that when I don't understand something I am not proud. You are.

And Chem Captain it would be very good for you too if you could do something constructive for once, like Seeker for example who at least found a link on Dr. Judah Ben Hur that provided us with some information.

Told us something we didn't know. And led us towards further useful knowledge.


 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
ChemCaptain





Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 6:22 pm  Reply with quote  

"And Chem Captain it would be very good for you too if you could do something constructive for once, like Seeker for example who at least found a link on Dr. Judah Ben Hur that provided us with some information"

How many times are you going to play the "I'm doing nothing constructive" card (it's a new card, I know!) Havla? You know, I'm sorry that seeker posted the link before me, I'll make sure and work out who's turn it is to post them next time

Okay I'm gonna jump around a bunch in this message.. You should probably take each paragraph pretty seperately. Here we go. Anytime now.

What you may see as useful information others see as a load of bull, and what I may see as useful information you see as *disinformation*.. Why should I waste my time doing *anything* if it is automatically labeled so?

Moving on...

How much more useful information do you want? The entire chemtrail theory has been debunked so many times I lost count before I even started counting. The only thing keeping it alive are people too stupid or too dug in to want anything else but for it to be true. The chemtrail theory was bred out of ignorance for people's surroundings, we don't understand, so it must be bad! One spark, one person making the suggestion.

Bred out of ignorance, continued on by arrogance! Add a little 'compassion' and it sounds like most of the enviromentalist movement, actually.

All in all, it's not really easy to give you more 'useful information' about the chemtrail theory than has already been presented, havla. Unless you want me to restate the same things over and over again, and I'm sure you don't want that; I'd hear about how I'm just restating the same information, over and over again.

Blah, I'm tired. Can I go now?
 View user's profile Send private message
Jeanie





Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1319
Location: North East U.S.A.
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 9:48 pm  Reply with quote  

"That is why others on this board designate
as traitors those who persist in your stance"

Chem Captain got bent all out of shape when I called him a traitor. I was going to repy but now I don't have to, because Halva did it so eloquently for me, when he identified what kind of public posting constitutes traitorous acts such as telling the American public areosol spraying does not exist when all the time knowing full well it does and that patents for said spraying are available for all to read.

Halva; these fools can't seem to understand what you could possibly have been talking about when you said their stand of denying chemtrails could incite terrorist acts by some, possibly taking the law into their own hands...This, I would like to make clear I could never condone. It is possible that some out of frustration because of lack of explanation and denial by govt. authorities, could feel the need to take action. You debunkers have no idea what fools of yourselves you are making. This is especially for you, I save this one for special occaisions. Yours truly Jeanie
 View user's profile Send private message
Thermit





Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3130
Location: Texas
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 9:50 pm  Reply with quote  

quote:

The entire chemtrail theory has been debunked so many times I lost count before I even started counting. The only thing keeping it alive are people too stupid or too dug in to want anything else but for it to be true. The chemtrail theory was bred out of ignorance for people's surroundings, we don't understand, so it must be bad! One spark, one person making the suggestion.

Bred out of ignorance, continued on by arrogance!




Actually that is not true. The Chemtrail "theory" was "bred" by astute observers who noticed different unusual aerial operations. While there may be ignorance and arrogance at play some minds who believe, just like it is in play in your mind as your excuse to write the whole thing off, it isn't the reason for the Chemtrail theory.

quote:

Blah, I'm tired. Can I go now?



Since you so rudely and with such contempt suggest that everyone here is beneath you, I can understand that this is quite a trial for you to be here, and yes, you are tired, so let us release you from your burden. Yes, you can go now...


You might enjoy this observation of an Air Force guy...


quote:
http://www.anomalies.net/cgi-bin/bbs/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=000023

Perhaps I can shed some light on this chem-trail/con-trail thing.
I've been in the Air Force for 26 years, and while my field is combat communications, I am familiar with a lot of the flying-type missions.

I'm not familiar with anything that might be considered weather modification.

On the OTHER hand. Two years ago, I had just bought my wife a hot tub for Mother's Day. We decided that it was nice to sit out in the evening and watch the skies. Something I do anyway, is watch the skies, always have, always will. I've very familiar with the air traffic control patterns in our area of the Front Range. I know where planes will be found, I know where they aren't supposed to be.

Late one evening about 5 or 6 weeks after we had the hot tub, and had been sitting out every evening, there was a clear sky, the sun was just going behind the mountains and I noticed several air craft flying in formation. I grabbed some binoculars that I keep sitting near the tub and noted they looked like tankers.

At about the same time I got a good bead on one, it started to show a trail, where it had not been showing one moments before.

When I took my eyes from the binoculars, I saw a string of about 8 or 9 planes. Eight trails for certain could be seen, evenly spaces several thousand feet apart, at around 40 or 50 thousand feet (that's an estimate only, based on the plane - they were KC-135s, I got a very good look at them through my spotter scope a few minutes later).

I watched the planes travel east to west, then the trails ceased.

The planes vanished behind Pikes Peak and the mountain range. About 20 minutes later, the reappeared to the south. By then I had my camera, and my spotter scope (where I confirmed I was seeing a KC-135 tanker). I took a couple of shots, because I'd never seen anything like it before. I figured it was some kind of practice for an air show.

They planes traveled from south to north (almost precisely on true north) - and then they continued the pattern. When they finished, I was seeing a checkerboard pattern. At the same time, I started noticing no more air planes in the area.

The next day was Saturday, so I called over to Peterson and asked about an air show, they weren't aware of anything.

I asked about the "show" I'd observed the night before. They knew "nothing about that". I asked about the patterns they left, and the folks at Operations were not aware of any flights that would have involved tankers flying in formation, nor were they aware of anything else going on the night before.

The Colorado Springs tower DID confirm they had diverted traffic for a couple of hours around the Pikes Peak region for some unknown military maneauvers. But, no one could confirm the exercise.

We don't fly KC-135's out of Peterson, we fly C-130s. None of my pilot friends were aware of anything either.

I wrote it off until I heard an Art Bell show one night. Then it started to click.

So - before Tycho, or anyone else offhandedly dismisses this subject as an urban legend (and you're fine to believe what you will, Sir) I would suggest you all take another look at it.

Rick Donaldson
Anomalies Network Admin
Colorado Springs




In case you miss the points, here is his summary...


quote:

1) I SAW a formation of at least eight aircraft, which I did identify as KC-135s (those are Boeing 707s, with a "stinger", the refueling device under the tail of the plane. You can't possibly confuse them with other planes when you know what you're looking at).

2) The planes were flying side by side at a distance of several thousand feet apart, traveling from east to west when I spotted them.

3) The planes BEGAN to show trails at exactly the same time, across a vast region of the sky. Trust me the weather patterns here are ANYTHING but precise, and thus the chances of EACH AIRCRAFT (scattered over several miles apart) starting to show a contrail at precisely the same time are astronomical in the Pikes Peak region due to the various surges and updrafts from the mountain range). It would not have happened. Period.

4) The planes ceased depositing a cloud trail behind them at EXACTLY the same time. Military precision in flying is, if nothing else both a pleasure to watch, and a pleasure to know our military is capable of doing, in the defense of my country. It was NOT unusual for me to have seen something like that - at air shows throughout the country. Thus, I ASSUMED at the TIME it was some sort of practice for an air show. I was mistaken. There were no air shows anywhere within several states of me on that weekend. (It was a Friday night, generally before air shows, the participants practice the day and evening before the actual shows. That's a fact, check with any air show in your area, or in the US).

5) the planes changed course, after they flew behind the mountain range, and returned roughly twenty minutes later. They came from the south and flew northward, EXACTLY on true north (I have it marked in my yard, because of antenna orientation and communications dishes I have there, so I KNOW which way north is). At precisely the point where the first "contrail" started, the planes again started to show trails. They ended exactly when they had flown to the last one (which was about 2 minutes I think).

From my own observations - I saw a formation of military aircraft, turning on and off some sort of device that allowed for a visible cloud formation. There were NO OTHER CONTRAILS that afternoon, before, OR after. These were NOT contrails. I didn't even consider any other possibilities than it was an air show until I confirmed there weren't any, anywhere near by. When I called the tower, they told me that normal air traffic had been diverted for a full two hours (at least). They only said it had to do with military maneauvers.

I didn't hear ANYTHING about "chemtrails" until about a year later. The pictures popped up to haunt me a few days after I heard the Art Bell show. I sent them off to that guy that runs the web site about it. I've never heard anything else about it, except the occasional posts like this thread.



[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 08-19-2003]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 9:52 pm  Reply with quote  

define in the specific, what "aerosol spraying" is jeanie...
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Thermit





Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3130
Location: Texas
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 9:54 pm  Reply with quote  

See the familiar quote above, seeker, I think that defines aerosol operations, at least to me.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 9:58 pm  Reply with quote  

wow, slipped in on me there...I remember rick's visit...what ever happened to that guy ?....jeanie's version was what I was looking for...

some people's contrails are other people's chemtrails...and vice versa...

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Jeanie





Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1319
Location: North East U.S.A.
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 10:09 pm  Reply with quote  

Seeker; you are not going to engage me in some non senseable conversation about aerosol trails. It's not a new subject, go to Caricoms site and look it up yourself.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Jeanie on 08-19-2003]
 View user's profile Send private message
Thermit





Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3130
Location: Texas
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 10:09 pm  Reply with quote  

quote:

some people's contrails are other people's chemtrails...and vice versa...



Tis true, tis true.

Some admission from the government/military would make it a lot easier on all of us. Although I could imagine that the surge of traffic might bring the site down!

I think Rick is still over there at anomalies.net...

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 10:19 pm  Reply with quote  

whatever jeanie

Some admission from the government/military would make it a lot easier on all of us. Although I could imagine that the surge of traffic might bring the site down!

considering what fark.com did you may be right
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Feelin Kocky





Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Location: Underground Weather Control Bunker
PostTue Aug 19, 2003 11:09 pm  Reply with quote  

>>Telling me you don't understand again Kokky?<<

That's Kocky and you are a jackass.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Feelin Kocky on 08-19-2003]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
halva





Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 510
Location: Greece
PostWed Aug 20, 2003 6:19 am  Reply with quote  

Did you understand Thermit's post above, FK?

Give us a weather report to show it was NOT POSSIBLE. That's the solution.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  
1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:24 pm


  Display posts from previous:      



Conspiracy List | Papa Guru | Alien Sky | Escape Games


© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum