|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
 Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:36 pm
|
 |
|
BTW, Letxa, I did correct my statement on chaff being illegal. It was my mistake. Chaff would have created quite an upheaval and that was the point I later made. It wasn't chaff, afterall, couldn't have been, yet the weather report, that was later withdrawn from the sight, reported it that way. It couldn't have been chaff. So what was it? Obviously SOMETHING was being sprayed. That was the point of the weather report -- it confirmed that SOMETHING was being sprayed. What it is, is still a matter of investigation. But the fact that planes are spraying something other than chaff and other than contrails is evident.
Why beat that horse when I clarified it before? We're all human and late at night we're prone to make more mistakes. I rescinded my statement and corrected it.
Planes are spraying SOMETHING in the Bay Area and Santa Cruz (where I was raised and went to college for the first time) and THAT WAS THE POINT of the WHOLE ARTICLE.
Who told the weather service to report "chaff" in the first place?
Why did they take it off the weather site?
And WHAT are they spraying?
ARE THE QUESTIONS of note! |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Thu Apr 22, 2004 9:23 pm
|
|
|
BoomerChick: Please see my chaff response in the Santa Cruz thread.
|
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu May 24, 2012 3:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
