|
|
JerseyBluEyz

Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Posts: 1257
Location: Northeast |
Oceans Awash With Microscopic Plastic
Tue May 25, 2004 8:54 pm
|
|
|
If you go to the shore this summer, expect to cool off in water laced with plastic and whatnots! This DOES NOT sound appealing!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/05/0506_040506_oceanplastic.html
U.K. researchers say microscopic plastic fragments pervade the world's beaches and marine environment. Top: A microscopic plastic fragment is pictured in the intestinal tract of a marine amphipod, Orchestia gammarellus. Larger trash also plagues world shorelines. Bottom: A tail section of a space rocket was washed ashore the Caribbean island of St. Lucia.
Top photograph copyright Science; bottom image courtesy Richard Charles Thompson
Oceans Awash With Microscopic Plastic, Scientists Say
James Owen for National Geographic News
May 6, 2004
Beaches worldwide bear witness to the ugly impact of plastic debris on our oceans. Milk jugs, water bottles, cigarette lighters, diaper liners, jar lids, cheap toys, and goodness knows what else festoon tide lines today. But this may just scratch the surface.
A new study suggests that microscopic bits of plastic have sifted, unseen, throughout the marine environment. The plastic not only litters the beach, it is—like fine bits of sand—becoming the beach.
U.K. researchers in Plymouth and Southampton, England, found that microscopic fragments of nylon, polyester, and seven other types of plastic are widespread in sediments around British shores.
The sediments were collected from beaches, estuaries, and shallow waters. "Everything that didn't look like a piece of natural organic debris was then identified," said Richard Thompson, a senior marine ecology lecturer at the University of Plymouth, who led the study. Up to a third of this material was later identified as synthetic polymers used in plastics.
Even so, the scientists write in the research journal Science: "We believe that these [fragments] probably represent only a small proportion of the microscopic plastic in the environment."
Thompson says the amount is probably greater, but they currently lack the technology to accurately distinguish plastic debris less than 20 microns in diameter (a width thinner than a human hair).
Beyond plastic-enriched shorelines, the team found that plastic particles are now common in the high seas.
To gauge long-term trends, the scientists examined plankton samples collected over the past 40 years in shipping lanes between Iceland and Scotland. Results showed there was approximately three times more plastic in the water column in the 1990s compared with the 1960s.
"Estimates for the longevity of plastic range from a hundred to a thousand years," Thompson said. "Since we've only been [mass producing] plastics for 40 years, we still don't have a full handle on their longevity."
The impact of larger plastic flotsam on marine wildlife is well documented. According to the U.K.'s Marine Conservation Society, a national environmental nonprofit, more than a million seabirds and 100,000 mammals and sea turtles die globally each year from entanglement in, or ingestion of, plastics.
Plastic Bags
Waterlogged plastic bags look like jellyfish to feeding turtles. Seabirds mistake raw plastic pellets spilled from container ships for fish eggs. Plastic sheeting has even been found in the stomachs of dolphins and whales. (Once lodged in an animal's digestive tract, plastic can prove fatal.)
While most plastics are non-biodegradable, Thompson says the action of waves and the elements work to break plastic objects down into fragments tiny enough to be ingested by countless other marine organisms.
To test the potential for this to occur, Thompson and his colleagues kept barnacles, lugworms, and detritus-eating amphipods in aquaria with small amounts of microscopic plastics. These invertebrates all ingested the fragments within a few days.
Thompson highlights two possible environmental impacts that his team will investigate over the next three years. "One is that these smaller fragments could cause blockages to the feeding apparatus and the digestive tract [of marine invertebrates], just as plastic bags have affected larger animals like turtles," he said.
"The second area we're exploring is the possibility of chemical transfer from plastics to these organisms."
Many plastics contain toxic chemicals, including biocides (to prevent organisms colonizing their surfaces), colorings, and flexibility-enhancing agents known as plasticizers. These substances could be released if the plastics were eaten.
Thompson added: "Another possibility, recently shown by researchers in Japan, is that when plastics are floating in the seas, they will accumulate and absorb toxic chemicals that are present from other sources. These are hydrophobic chemicals that hate to be in water and cling to plastic as an alternative. These chemicals may then be transported to organisms that eat the plastic."
Such toxic chemicals include PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and DDE (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene), which are derived from pesticides and other manmade substances. These agents are known endocrine disruptors—chemicals that interfere with the reproductive, developmental, and immune systems of animals.
"Gender Benders"
Endocrine disruptors, or so-called "gender benders," have been linked to the masculization of female polar bears, egg development in male flatfish, and spontaneous abortions and declines in seal populations.
Other recent studies likewise suggest that vast quantities of microscopic plastics are building up in our oceans. For example, researchers from the Algalita Marine Research Foundation in Long Beach, California, found that the mass of plastic fragments in parts of the central Pacific Ocean is six times greater than that of resident plankton.
Thompson said he has catalogued plastic debris in many parts of world, including a space rocket tail-cone washed up on a beach on the Caribbean island of St. Lucia.
"Plastics have a wide range of indispensable uses, from telephones to radio sets, but those aren't the products we're finding on the beaches," he said. "What we are finding, increasingly, are plastic bottles, caps, bits of packaging—disposable items which are used once and then thrown away."
This view is supported by the results of the U.K.'s biggest annual beach litter survey, published last month by the Marine Conservation Society. Conducted last September, 2,600 volunteers beach-combed 135 kilometers (84 miles) of coastline.
Beach-goers were found to be the biggest polluters, contributing 36.7 percent of litter found. Plastic items made up more than half of the total trash recovered. This included 5,831 plastic bags—the equivalent of 43 bags for each kilometer (0.6 mile) of coastline surveyed. Andrea Crump, a litter projects coordinator with the Marine Conservation Society, said: "Every single piece of rubbish has an owner. And every single person can make a difference by making sure they take their rubbish with them when they leave the beach."
Thompson added: "There's a challenge here for all of us to be more careful in the way we use and dispose of plastic."
[Edited 1 times, lastly by JerseyBluEyz on 05-25-2004] |
| |
|
|
Catnip57

Joined: 22 Apr 2001
Posts: 596
Location: Central Washington |
Tue May 25, 2004 11:11 pm
|
|
|
Good Article here JBE... thanks for posting it...
quote:The sediments were collected from beaches, estuaries, and shallow waters. "Everything that didn't look like a piece of natural organic debris was then identified," said Richard Thompson, a senior marine ecology lecturer at the University of Plymouth, who led the study. Up to a third of this material was later identified as synthetic polymers used in plastics.
I wonder if they’ve also been finding those long polymer fibers that make up the spider web like material that’s been seen falling all over the land... It’s one thing to get people to stop throwing their polluting plastics products into the water... We can’t even get some one to pay attention to the web fibers.
"The second area we're exploring is the possibility of chemical transfer from plastics to these organisms."
"Gender Benders"
Endocrine disruptors, or so-called "gender benders," have been linked to the masculization of female polar bears, egg development in male flatfish, and spontaneous abortions and declines in seal populations.
Yeah and then we eat these fish after all these disruptions take place in their bodies... When I think about how clams and other shell fish consume their foods... yikes! And then we eat the clams.... it’s no wonder humans are getting sick with various maladies.
Plastics have a wide range of indispensable uses, from telephones to radio sets, but those aren't the products we're finding on the beaches," he said. "What we are finding, increasingly, are plastic bottles, caps, bits of packaging—disposable items which are used once and then thrown away."
Well... if they were really trying to be smart with the environment they should be making some of these disposable packaging products out of something that will dissolve into harmless substances after exposure to the elements. Maybe they should be making shopping bags out of paper again... or maybe some type of hemp plant... I could be wrong but I thought that plastic was a byproduct of crude oil..... which is another good reason to find other alternatives considering the rising cost of oil.
|
| |
|
|

|
|

All times are GMT. The time now is Thu May 24, 2012 10:19 am
|
|
|
|
|