|
|
CDsNuTz
Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 950
Location: Down the hill a bit |
Bombs in Utah
 Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:25 am
|
 |
|
Mushroom Cloud
On our way back home from a family drive on 8/29/04 my wife and I noticed a peculiar mushroom cloud just east of our home in Wellington, UT. We ran into the house and brought our both of our digital cameras and started snapping pictures. Within 2 hours there were three different “explosions” resulting in mushroom clouds.
We emailed a local news station; they looked into the pictures but to no avail. There were truck drivers parked at the gas station just down from our home, the drivers did not dare drive the road for fear of whatever was happening out there. Pretty scary afternoon, especially during this time of heightened alert in our nation.
--Brian Justice
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page647.html
 |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
|
Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:05 pm
|
|
|
Sure looks like a Mini-Nuke, similar to the 1951 blast of "Easy"
Test:Easy; Date:April 20 1951;
Operation:Greenhouse;
Site:Island Enjebi ("Janet"), Enewetak Atoll;
Detonation:Tower Shot, altitude - 300ft; Yield:47kt; Type:Fission;
The goal of the Easy shot during the Greenhouse operation was the proof testing of the TX-5D bomb. Basically it was a major advance in weight reduction for implosion bombs. TX-5d weighted 2700 lb compared to Fat-Man's 10 000 lb and it's diameter was significantly reduced as well, 40 inch diameter in TX and 60 inch diameter for Fat-Man. TX used a lens implosion that utilized 92 points the core used in its design was a composite (plutonium/oralloy). Interestingly, later on this design was used as the primary in the first thermonuclear bomb test, Ivy Mike.
One more goal of the Easy shot was to test the effects of the nuclear weapons on various military structures. For several weeks military was building various structures on Enjebi and Mijakadrek Islands. Trinity and beyond has a footage of this shot and it sure looks more than impressive.
 |
| |
|
|
Thetaloops
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 151
|
|
Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:43 pm
|
|
|
Having grown up with the pictures of nuclear explosions all over and practicing 'Duck and Cover' techniques in school, this current event really hits home. Very scary! The shape of the explosion looks nuclear, the mushroom cloud, as demonstrated by swampgas' pictures from the 50's, it looks almost exactly the same, except maybe slightly smaller.
And what about the fall out? No warning to the locals to protect themselves from that. When they were testing in Nevada in the 1956 the fall out fell on the whole cast of 'The Conqueror'. The whole cast of the movie eventually died of cancer, including John Wayne, Agnes Moorehead, Pedro Armendariz, Susan Hayward, John Hoyt, Lee Van Cleef and many other.
Whoever did this is definitely planning to use them somewhere? Where is this information in the news? When North Korea did this it was all over the news? We are in Deep S**T! |
| |
|
|
CDsNuTz
Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 950
Location: Down the hill a bit |
|
Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:45 pm
|
|
|
Im sure some of that made it to CO., bastards |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
|
Tue Sep 28, 2004 12:20 am
|
|
|
We thought of you in Colorado CD. Maybe you should go for some tests to see if anything was absorbed, if it was in fact a nuke.
I checked the Wellington, UT news, and nothing came up about this. Even it was a conventional explosion, why was it ignored by the media? Something weird is afoot, and it ain't good.
I would like to get in touch with Brian Justice, and get a more detailed report. |
| |
|
|
CDsNuTz
Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 950
Location: Down the hill a bit |
|
Sun Oct 03, 2004 4:08 pm
|
|
|
http://www.rense.com/general57/red.htm
Red Mercury - The WMD No
One Wants To Talk About
9-29-4
On Friday, September 24, 2004, British police arrested 4 suspects for allegedly trying to purchase a 'highly powerful, radioactive material, originally made in Russia, know as' Red Mercury'.
These four supposedly were willing to pay $ 541,000 a kilogram, on behalf of a Saudi Arabian, (described as sympathetic to the Muslim cause'), whose name was not disclosed.
"The News of the World said that the material was developed by Soviet scientists during the Cold War for making briefcase nuclear bombs that could kill people within a few city blocks."
Sam Cohen, the physicist who invented the neutron bomb, sheds a little more light on the destructive power of red mercury. As quoted from a June 15, 1997 http://www.manuelsweb.com/sam_cohen.htm
article by Christopher Ruddy of the Tribune-Review, it states:
'Most frightening for Cohen is the relative ease by which neutron bombs can be created with a substance called red mercury. Red mercury is a compound containing mercury that has undergone irradiation. When exploded, it creates tremendous heat and pressure - the same type needed to trigger a fusion device such as a mini-neutron bomb.
Before, an obstacle to creating a nuclear bomb was the need for plutonium, which when exploded could create a fusion reaction in hydrogen atoms. But red mercury has changed that. The cheap substance has been produced in Russia, Cohen said, and shipped on the black market throughout the world.
Cohen said that when UN inspectors went to Iraq to examine the Iraqi's nuclear weapons capabilities, the U.N. team found documents showing that they had purchased quantities of red mercury. The material means that a neutron bomb can be built "the size of a baseball" but able to kill everyone within several square blocks."
Another article, "<http://www.tribulationalinstitute.com/Powerpoint/red_mercury_nightmare.htm>The Balance of Terror and the Red Mercury Nightmare" states that 'Iraq possesses "s-megaton" micro-nuclear warheads. These are softball sized two-megaton fusion bombs triggered by an irradiated and compressed compound of mercury antimony oxide. This device doubles the nuclear yield with a hundredfold reduction in weight. Using heavy hydrogen instead of uranium or plutonium to fuel its explosive reaction, this handheld nuclear weapon cannot be detected by U.S. sensors.'
Red Mercury.The CIA says that it does not exist, yet terrorist organizations worldwide are willing to pay outrageous amounts of money to procure itScientists have alluded that nuclear weapons containing red mercury, can enter the United States, UNDETECTED, be placed in cities all across the country, and cause cataclysmic destructionfrom a nuclear bomb, of incredible power, the size of a softballI don't know about you folks, but this REALLY scares me!
Now, what bothers me even more, is that last year, confidential intelligence sources informed me that a Special Ops unit in Iraq had lost track of about a ton of red mercury. I have not heard anything to the contrary, so I am assuming that it is still missing. How could that happen???
According to the research that I have done and talking to the contacts that I have in the Intelligence community, red mercury not only destroys human life, but kills every living thing in its path for eternity!!! In other words, where its destructive energy has touched, NOTHING will ever live again, not at least in our lifetime!
Let me go one further, my sources inform me that it would only take a teaspoon of red mercury to kill all living creatures in the Great Lakes.
So now that I have your attention.think about this..We have all seen or heard about the posts from the Arabic forums that indicate that an American city will disappear, are these threats really that far-fetched????
Think again!
http://www.homelandsecurityus.net/red_mercury.htm
Comment
From George Paxinos
9-30-4
Red Mercury, as far as I know it, is NOT detonatable by itself.
I believe this is a smokescreen to keep it from being understood by the public.
What it is, is an efficient TAMPER, making possible the successful IMPLOSION FISSIONING of MINISCULE AMOUNTS of PLUTONIUM.
No more the still-fabled "critical mass" of around 35 lbs of fissile material!
It is MERCURIC-STYBIC HEPTOXIDE - Hg2Sb2O7
And its crystal structure has a lattice of little hollow spaces, into which plutonium atoms fit snugly, and are probably drifted in by a combination of gas-diffusion and/or electrolysis.
The heavy atoms of Mercury (Hg) and Antimony (Sb) reflect back neutrons into the mass at the same time they hold the plutonium while it is fissioning, by inertia of their heavy nuclei having too tremendous MOMENTUM by their implosion of a shell lined with Hg2Sb2O7 saturated with Pu, using immense electromagnetic fields generated by explosive FLUX-COMPRESSION GENERATORS (FCGs), and giving many times more velocity and hundreds or even thousands of times more energy density of implosion, than any chemical implosion technique ever could. |
| |
|
|
one_son_of_helaman
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 99
|
| nukes? or not?
Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:08 pm
|
|
|
i cannot say they are not nukes but it is posable that they were just large quantaties of tnt or plastic sett off by demolitions experts from the military i have a brotherinlw that has placed somewhere between 30 and 75 pounds of tnt together in training and told us that is created a mushroom clowd that was much larger than he would have expected. so my theory is that they military was just detenating large quataties of old munitions or tnt that was too unstable for safe use on the field!
_________________
There is no box w/out walls to look beyond!!! |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu May 24, 2012 11:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
