|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
737...not 767 slammed into the WTC?
 Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:38 am
|
 |
|
Architect of GOP Resurgence Says Boeing 737, not 767, Struck South WTC Tower
American Free Press/Greg Szymanski | April 25 2005
A former Republican Party insider turned Bush basher thinks he has stumbled across what may be the “smoking gun,” proving the U.S. government’s official story about the WTC attacks is an “unequivocal lie.”
Karl Schwarz of Little Rock, Ark., who several years ago began exposing corruption amongst the neo-conservative movement in a book entitled A One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas, now has set his sights on proving government complicity in 9-11.
For years, the successful business entrepreneur and conservative Republican, once asked by the RNC to run against Bill Clinton for Arkansas governor, has been using his inside political and business clout to expose corruption among the neo-cons in the Bush administration.
He strayed away from the Bush agenda two years after being one of the lead orchestrators in the Republican Party takeover of Congress during the Clinton administration.
“I designed the strategy that took the House and Senate from Clinton,” recalls Schwarz, also a strong supporter and strategist for President George H. W. Bush. “I designed that takeover two years before I realized the Republican ‘Contract with America’ was actually a ‘Contract on America.’ ”
After his political reawakening, Schwarz began blasting the neo-cons where it hurt most—in their pocketbooks—coming forward with evidence regarding oil deals and government involvement with the Taliban and Pakistan.
In his book and his ongoing seven-part series of articles entitled “Pop Goes the Bush Mythology Bubble,” he provides inside information about countless financial scams, essentially revealing that the Bush motive behind the Middle East invasion was more about oil profits than the war on terrorism.
Saying the neo-cons within the government are destroying America for their own corporate-global benefits, Schwarz doesn’t mince words and is calling for the impeachment of Bush, as well as removal of any member of Congress who aids and abets the corrupt powers.
Now, moving away from financial corruption, he has turned his attention to the 9-11 truth movement, saying he has found a piece of obscure video footage that shows that the government lied about what type of plane struck the south tower of the WTC.
Schwarz admits he had a “whole lot” of luck when running across the video footage in a French foreign film entitled The Barbarian Invasion.
Contained in the film unrelated to 9-11, is a 1 minute, 52 second, video segment, shot by an unknown amateur photographer at the WTC, which Schwartz says clearly shows a Boeing 737 airliner striking the south tower.
“We tracked down the filmmaker and he acquired the original WTC segment from the Canadian News Service,” said Schwarz, adding that he has had the tape analyzed by experts proving it’s not a fake. “We are tracking down the original photographer and want to get to him before the government does in order to prove its authenticity.
“This segment, however, conclusively shows a 737 hit the south tower, not a 767 as previously reported. This in itself should be the smoking gun, which proves the whole story given to us by the government about 9-11 is untrue.”
Originally, the government claimed the second jetliner en route to Los Angeles was a Boeing 767. However, Schwarz said the video will not only show the airline dimensions to be those of a 737, but that he also has evidence that the engine recovered in the WTC wreckage was a model type CFM56, which propels a 737, not a 767.
“Not even two CFM56’s could get a 767 off the ground,” added Schwartz.
Besides 9-11, Schwartz said three major areas that need to be thoroughly investigated regarding the Bush administration’s present policies include:
• Administration ties with Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bridas Corp. Schwarz claims a high-ranking Bridas executive is one of his main sources, implicating the Bush administration with corruption involving the Taliban and the Afghan invasion.
• Information implicating 9-11 commission members with direct and indirect financial benefits due to the Bush policies in the Middle East.
“Whistleblowers Sibel Edmonds, Karen Kwiatkowski and others whom I cannot disclose without jeopardizing their safety, including many members of the armed services, have acted as my main sources,” said Schwarz.
Asked how he would describe himself, since many critics may consider him a disgruntled Republican, he said:
“I am conservative, fiscally responsible, an ecumenical Christian and an American patriot who clearly understands fascism and clearly sees this is exactly what is going on within the Bush administration.
“To answer my critics, they can say whatever. However, those who read my book will clearly see that the main problem now facing America has been caused and amplified by the last three presidential administrations, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II.” |
| |
|
|
stallion4
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 421
|
|
Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:50 am
|
|
|
A forum member at Jack Blood's board posted this video claiming that it's the same video that Schwarz has in his possession from the movie The Barbarian Invasion:
You can download the entire clip here:
http://download.alciada.net/911-737.mp4
Also here is an audio interview with Karl Schwarz talking about this footage on John Stadtmiller's show The National Intel Report:
Winamp
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0504/20050408_Fri_Stadtmiller.m3u
RealPlayer
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0504/20050408_Fri_Stadtmiller.ram
If I remember correctly, Schwartz mentions that he knows the precise location that the video was shot from allowing him to figure out the exact distance that the camera was from the tower. After determining what the distance was (Again, if I remember correctly) he said in the interview that an image of what a 767 would normally look like at that distance was super-imposed over the plane in the video and clearly shows that the plane in the video was not a 767 meaning that the governments story about flight 175 being hijacked and flown into the South Tower is a total lie.
Here's the link that's posted over at Jack Blood's forum for more information on this developing story:
http://www.phpbbserver.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=1012&mforum=jackblood |
| |
|
|
newtonnjd
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 167
Location: Arlington TX, USA |
|
Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:28 pm
|
|
|
Interesting clip. One strange thing I notice is the small puff of dust emerging near the right hand edge of the building but below the wing. It seems to appear too soon to be caused the internal effects of the impact. |
| |
|
|
stallion4
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 421
|
|
Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:02 am
|
|
|
Here's a link that has more info about this footage:
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2hit9/
So far this is the best vid that I've been able to find of this clip:
http://www.911wiki.org/video/secondplane.avi
Also here's some of what Karl Schwarz had to say during the John Stadtmiller interview concerning this footage:
Transcript excerpt from The National Intel Report with host John Stadtmiller 4/08/05:
quote:
[SNIP]
SCHWARZ: We have, just in the last 72 hours, received not one but two new videos of 9/11. One of them was shot from the East River side, from way over across the river. The guy has actually zoomed in when the first building was hit. And then for some inexplicable reason, he zoomed out and did not get a real good image of the second plane coming in. But he did get a real good shot of the explosion that was set off. He was evidently at an elevated position, somewhere on the eastside of the East River. And that video is in the process of being picked apart and analyzed right now.
About 3 – 3 ½ weeks ago, we became aware – because it was inserted in a movie – we became aware of some other footage of 9/11 that is not out here spreading around on any of the websites. You know, nobody has picked it apart. Nobody has analyzed it. And we finally found out where that video came from. We tracked down its producer. We tracked down the guy who shot it. We know exactly where he was standing when he shot it. And what got his attention was, of course, the impact on the north tower. He was filming that. And we are talking about some incredibly sharp TV quality video. When he zoomed in on the north tower, you can actually see five people jump out the windows where flames were leaping from those windows. You can actually tell what color slacks they were wearing, what color shirt – you know that type of imaging and that type of clarity. But he just happened to have kept his camera trained on that. He zoomed back out. All of a sudden, here comes streaking in that second plane that impacted the south tower.
Now so far, I’ve looked at every one of the videos there is out there. We’ve analyzed it. And all we’ve been able to come up with is it is a type of plane that has two engines under the wings. But you couldn’t blow it up and actually verify what it was. You couldn’t tell if it was a 737 or a 767. In this new video, we have 39 individual frames of this airplane, as it is closing in from the field of view, you know what the lens is seeing, and impacting the building. Thirty-nine individual stills of this plane. So we have some very good imaging – looking right up at it. And there is some interesting things to disclose about that plane.
Everybody has heard this rumor that it was a – yeah, there have been rumors spread around over the internet, that this was a hologram and it penetrated the south building silently. This guy had his audio turned on and you can hear the jet engines screaming. One of the things that we have been able to ascertain is that you can tell a lot just by the sound of the engines what type of engines they are. That’s one thing we are working on right now.
The second thing is we are analyzing each one of those thirty-nine images. We know exactly where this photographer was standing. So we can measure the base – from the base of the World Trade Center to his footprints. We can measure the height of the impact and calculate the hypotenuse, simple geometry, very accurately. And we are going to superimpose over this particular airplane what a 737 and a 707, modified with two engines instead of four. And also, a 767 looks like. And I think when those people – we’ve already distributed this out. And we’ve got some experts working on what I’ve just described. When people see the answers to that right there in front of their eyes, I think they are going to understand to what extent we’ve all been lied to. And some people in Washington and some people in New York City have an awful lot of answering to do.
[SNIP]
The entire transcript can be read HERE |
| |
|
|
stallion4
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 421
|
|
Tue May 03, 2005 2:48 am
|
|
|
Karl Schwarz Discusses the newly discovered video footage from 9/11 on today's National Intel Report w/ host John Stadtmiller and adamantly states that:
"...The plane that you're looking at in that picture is not what was advertised to us"
Here's an excerpt from the interview:
Karl Schwarz: I've got one lab that's already done just a cursory overlay of a 737 and of a 747 on that image and the 747 is condsiderably larger...
...The plane that you're looking at in that picture is not what was advertised to us"
John Stadtmiller: And they're saying what struck the tower was what model plane?
Schwarz: It was flight 175 out of Boston. It was a 767... which has a total wing span in the neighborhood of about 55.. 56 feet larger than that airplane (in the image).
You can listen to the entire Karl Schwarz interview from today's broadcast of The National Intel Report here (5/2/05):
(Interview begins 3 minutes into the first hour)
Window's Media Player
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0505/20050502_Mon_Stadtmiller.m3u
RealPlayer
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0505/20050502_Mon_Stadtmiller.ram
_________________
"You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows" |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
