|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
Russians get GW propaganda also
 Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:54 pm
|
 |
|
Blocking sunshine with aerosol may help avoid global warming
12/21/2005 16:39
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/16658_Earth.html
Russian researchers find effective methods for fighting global warming
Bringing the planet's temperatures down by reducing the amount of sun rays falling on it may help avoid global warming. This hypothesis was voiced by director of the Global Climate and Ecology Institute at Rosgidromet and the Russian Academy of Science, Yury Israel.
"To control the climate this way, some aerosol substances must be put into the lower stratosphere to absorb a part of sunlight. This in its turn will reduce the influence the Sun exerts upon the Earth's surface," the researcher said at a press-conference.
The researcher predicts that the temperature on the planet will go 1-5 degrees up in the coming one hundred years. The temperature rise will entail drought, cyclones, floods and other ecological disasters. He adds that for this purpose about 600,000 tons of aerosol particles must be pumped into the stratosphere to bring the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere 1-2 degrees down. This amount of aerosol particles can be obtained by burning 100-200,000 tons of sulfur.
Yury Israel says sulfur may be delivered to the stratosphere and burnt there. He also suggests using high-sulfur fuel in high-altitude planes. Both methods may reduce the temperature in the troposphere. These artificial formations usually drift in the stratosphere and form wide zones within the latitude of 30 to 70 degrees. These zones may protect the planet from solar radiation, the researcher believes.
Academician Isreal states that sulfur is not dangerous for human health. He explains that special calculations reveal solar radiation will reduce by less than one percent near the planet's surface while using the method. At that, the amount of aerosol precipitating on the Earth's surface will make up 0.2 mg per square meter a year, which is one thousand times less than the amount of sulfur falling on the planet together with atmospheric precipitation.
Yury Israel is sure that this method of global warming prevention that had been developed by Academician Mikhail Budyko earlier "is safe for people's health. It is cheaper and more effective than the measures provided by the Kyoto Protocol. According to the Protocol, developed countries of the world must reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their own free will. |
| |
|
|
Jeanie
Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
| Not Dangerous to Health=so they say
Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:43 pm
|
|
|
Health effects of sulphur (data sheet)
Sulfur can be found commonly in nature as sulphides. During several processes sulfur bonds are added to the environment that are damaging to animals, as well as humans. These damaging sulphur bonds are also shaped in nature during various reactions, mostly when substances that are not naturally present have already been added. They are unwanted because of their unpleasant smells and are often highly toxic.
Globally sulphuric substances can have the following effects on human health:
- Neurological effects and behavioural changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism
Effects of sulphur on the environment
Sulfur can be found in the air in many different forms. It can cause irritations of the eyes and the throat with animals, when the uptake takes place through inhalation of sulfur in the gaseous phase. Sulfur is applied in industries widely and emitted to air, due to the limited possibilities of destruction of the sulfur bonds that are applied.
The damaging effects of sulfur with animals are mostly brain damage, through malfunctioning of the hypothalamus, and damage to the nervous system.
Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause foetal damage and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother milk.
Finally, sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.
http://www.lenntech.com/Periodic-chart-elements/S-en.htm
Not surprising that we would get nothing but LIES  and they want us to believe sulphur is harmless to health of mammels and environment. |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
| i always wondered why EPA
Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:00 am
|
|
|
i always wondered why the FED EPA would force scrub the Sulfur from the fuels
sometimes i have even wondered where they put all the sulfur they scrubbed?
somewhat similar is that
the FEd ordered the removal of all the cocaine from coca cola and pepsie
and where is this mountain of coke~ that they removed?
where exactly did they put the tons of it?
so i have to ask where is the continent of sulfur that has been "removed"
from fuels over the last decade?
and why now is it being floated as a "cure"
as a simple farmer i know that Sulfur is a very essential element
in the growing of crops, and more so in the essential amino acids of protein synthesis of animals and vegitable crops.
as a farmer i must now purchace Sulfur to the tune of several hundreds of dollars per acre, as my crop consistes of 3% sulfur (dry weight)
in the days before all this new world oder
sulfur was delivered in the rains for free
before you jump to a con clusion weather the ruskies or nude world oders
have solved a non existant problem AKS iron mountain syndrome
ask youself "would i rather breath aluminun dust or sulfur powder"
and reject BOTH
for the very premise is wrong |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:26 am
|
|
|
i can quarentie you that aluminum is NOT an essential element for life
HOWEVER Sulfur is very essential to life in that protein synthesis
at the very plant level
depends upon this
and we as animals take our very breath of life because
plants consume sulfur
AND NOT ALUMINUM
so when the soviets promote sulfur, rather than aluminum
it is a small step toward
a solution for a non existant "problem" that a few iron mountainites
dreamed up
and unfortunately many have bitten the hook
i am so sorry that these, my friends and sons and daughters...
cannot see a chemtrail over their heads
for the life of them
but i will be damned to give up against these odds |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:36 am
|
|
|
it has become very obvious that although EMOTIONS about being sprayed by chemtrails
run somewhat high
and bushie is at about (5~15%)
very few ever payed any attention in chemisry class...
even these NSA twitts recording this...
our "con gress" is a little less educated than the average bear
perhaps on a nice chrismas hollowdaze
they could read the pat riot act in toto? |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Thu May 24, 2012 11:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
