CliffMickelson
Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 43
Location: Yakima, WA, USA |
UPDATE ON PROGRESS IN THE BATTLE AGAINST MORGELLONS!
 Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:37 pm
|
 |
|
re: fiber flukes
Hello Cliff:
I'll be brief. I remember reading you were working on a protocol to get the callus to break down for flukes' hooks to let go.
is it working? can you share yet?
God Bless
-R
***
Greetings, R:
Yes, we are having some success with attacking the callus. The neutralization of this primary defense perimeter is of utmost importance. We are currently experimenting with a chemical compound that appears to have strong solvent properties and attacks the bonds holding the callus across its entire matrix.
As is the propensity of this rather bizarre organism, it mimics many normal human biological functions and system responses.
This annoying and misleading proclivity is one that I have documented often in nearly all my posts on the subject.
The Morgellon's life form(s) does the job of bio-function imitation so well that it is often nearly impossible for the inexperienced eye to detect the fraud.
Hence, the callus displays the underside "hooks" that mimic what are known as karatotic plugs, (common in Lupus and in "impacted" calluses")
Protected beneath the shield of the callus is often found a very unusual class of large microbe. This particular creature has yet to be fully identified but suffice to say that it is highly aerobic and hence susceptible to the attack of compounds such as H2o2. (Hydrogen Peroxide) However, the peroxide cannot do its job if it is blocked from contact with the catalase, (enzyme) positive bacteria.
Therefore the removal or neutralization of the callus is a high priority. The compounds we have been experimenting with at this point in time appear to contain unspecified proportions of the following two prime ingredients, (Warning: both of which can be hazardous)
These compounds, (as best as we can determine at this point) appear to be Trichloroethylene and/or Perchloroethylene. (*Special thanks to Dr. R. Wymore for his invaluable assistance on this-CM)
The mass and chlorine content of those two compounds are too similar for general un-specialized chemistry skills to tell apart.
Now, here is where things get interesting... This compound is suspended in a what is known as an "amphipathic" formulation!
Most things are hydrophobic or hydrophilic. (Approx. water soluble or non soluble)
However, some substances are amphipathic. This means that part of the molecule is hydrophobic and part of it is hydrophilic.
(*)Cell membranes are formed out of amphipathic molecules. Lipids are
hydrophobic & phosphates are hydrophilic. Join them to make
phospholipids and you have created an amphipathic molecule. The phospholipid bi-layer of all known cells are amphipathic. The hydrophobic lipid tails shield each other in the middle of the membrane & the phospho-heads on the inside & outside of the cell are in a nice watery environment. Many petroleum products have these amphipathic properties. (*Wymore)
The application of the above described compound has proven to quickly loosen the grip of the lipids forming the protective shield of the callus. The callus then floats free of the skin and can be removed with no substantial effort. This then briefly allows the penetration of substances such as H202 and allows them to attack and destroy the otherwise secure bacilli.
We are continuing our work in this area and hope to be able to further define what appears to be a highly unusual set of symbiotic relationships at work beneath this odd pseudo callus structure.
Regards:
-CliffMickelson |
Login
