|
|
Mach_10
Banned Troll

Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 81
|
Re: haha
Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:03 pm
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by weatherman714 "dude you need to get a life and move out to the country because weather modification programs that can make airports safer is not going away."
I never once insulted your character or personal life no matter how crazy it sounds to point copper pipes with a piece of quartz in the middle at the sky and hope to deflect weather systems. I might get mad and take it over the edge from time to time because I do care too much and I do things to make a point. One thing people fail to understand is that politicans must be elected to maintain power, without that power the bataan is passed on to another and then to another until someone can do the job needed to satisify the democracy. Weather Modification is a power that will continue long after the bataan is passed. Whether the democrats or republicans are in power, those that modify the weather will have that power no matter what. The checks and balances come in when these people that have this power are put against the wall when the economy starts deteriorating... politicans start to ask questions, higher brass leak to politicans way up the food chain what's going on. Therefore what I possess is a check and balance to this corporate oligarchy, no matter how horrible it may seem. People have a lot of resources now, compared to what they will have 5, 10 years from now. I think it's something people need to understand.
Every discussion that I post, every correct weather forecast that I forecast is another dagger into the USAF and US Government's(NASA, NOAA,NWS, Accuweather, etc) agruement that chemtrails do not exist. The more meteorologist I e-mail the more it is becoming apparent that this private meteorlogist with 23 yrs experience who doesn't have a degree(in meteorlogy) is a large thorn in their side, forecasting weather in time frames with accuracy that their best professionals cannot explain. The idea that I do not need their permission to forecast weather, or to provide information to ensure those checks and balances is a complete blow to the current scientific system currently in place at the universities and in private industry. The Ph'D's use and abuse the undergrads for their own gain. Keep it in perspective.
This is how VRW typically reacts when you tell him something he does not agree with, but knows is true. He can’t handle it.
You will get more reactions like this on this board when you tell them more things they do not agree with, you will be called a troll, a paid troll, and what have you. You will be asked who you work for and who your boss is.
They will claim that your facts are bullsh*t (science is censored), but just as easy site the news or other sources (as long as they agree with their paradigm)
Basically you can never win whit them, but you can keep trying
P.s. can you edit to pictures in your first post in this topic, so the topic is its normal size |
| |
|
|
AA767
Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 57
|
Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:24 am
|
|
|
"Can you look at the sat. image over Seattle yesterday a.m. and pick up the 'X' that was seen by many? "
i dont understand the fascination with "X's". please explain why they can not simply be two crossing aicraft. i read one poster postulate that they were used by satellites. so in other words, they (the bad guys) would rather use trails from aircraft traveling at 550mph to mark a position in the sky than use GPS which is accurate to inches?
does any of this pass the smell taste? |
| |
|
|
Mach_10
Banned Troll

Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 81
|
Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:23 pm
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by AA767 "Can you look at the sat. image over Seattle yesterday a.m. and pick up the 'X' that was seen by many? "
i dont understand the fascination with "X's". please explain why they can not simply be two crossing aicraft. i read one poster postulate that they were used by satellites. so in other words, they (the bad guys) would rather use trails from aircraft traveling at 550mph to mark a position in the sky than use GPS which is accurate to inches?
does any of this pass the smell taste?
This, AA767, because, even though they can modify the weather, control our mind or what ever, the US government is really dumb. So dumb in fact that mister average Joe can look right trough their plans, and even agents, specially trained to infiltrate web communities, are easily marked as trolls or paid trolls by mister average Joe (how ever did you survive against the Russians, they too have many mister average Joes). |
| |
|
|
weatherman714
tagged & banned
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 953
Location: Maryland |
lol
Mon Jul 03, 2006 5:03 pm
|
|
|
quote: This is how VRW typically reacts when you tell him something he does not agree with, but knows is true. He can’t handle it.
You will get more reactions like this on this board when you tell them more things they do not agree with, you will be called a troll, a paid troll, and what have you. You will be asked who you work for and who your boss is.
They will claim that your facts are bullsh*t (science is censored), but just as easy site the news or other sources (as long as they agree with their paradigm)
Basically you can never win whit them, but you can keep trying
P.s. can you edit to pictures in your first post in this topic, so the topic is its normal size
This is nothing new. I've gotten it from the debunkers since Oct'02 and when I went through their archive they started making fun of me about the same time the government vechiles followed me to college everyday from the same Wendy's Parking lot for two weeks.
I get it from the other end too. "Oh he's out there with this science stuff", from people that walk around with foil protective clothing. Yea it's nothing new, I just show up, explain what I see, if people listen that's great, if they agree all the better, if not then that's their god given right as American's and if they want to bitch about it, that's their God Given right too.
[/quote] |
| |
|
|
visual ray wizard

Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 439
Location: United States |
I am not making fun of you are bebunking you weatherman
Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:44 am
|
|
|
Dude what I am saying is that if you live that close to an airport and expect the government to stop a possible weather modification project that is helping make air travel safer than that what I am saying to you is the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few.
What if the govt could manipulate local weather so that planes can travel safer would have them shut it down so that you can ski more close to home? It's not about you it's about the whole idea that they are doing this because of you that seems quite out there.
Of course no more so than pointing copper pipes with crystals and influencing local weather. So it is kind of funny if you think about it!
Don't take what I said personal but in the big scheme of things hopefully these weather manipulation programs will be run for the common good of us all. If I were going to take bets they most likely are not going to shut that program down when lives could be endangered by doing so. That is all I was trying to say, I believe your chemtrail theories so let's keep that straight ok?
Here is a link regarding a story on how the airliner industry is operating safer than ever before. It's probably no accident if you get my pun!
I would pay particular attention to the "other technology" perspective that goes unnamed.
http://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/World/20060701/378922.html
U.S. documents show new warning devices and other technological improvements have made airlines around the world safer than ever, says a report.
A USA Today reports says the safety conclusion in the documents are based on analyses of near crashes and other factors. The report says there has not been a single passenger fatality in a U.S.-registered airline jet crash in more than 4 1/2 years, the longest such period in modern aviation history.
The report, however, notes there are still risks in the airways such as the near crashes or little-known accidents in which no one was hurt that have occurred in the past 16 months.
But it also notes that the risk of a passenger dying on an airline jet flight has fallen sharply to one flight in 22.8 million in the past five years, a 60 percent drop from the 1990s. That is like saying a person must fly every day for more than 64,000 years before dying in an accident, says the report. _________________ Being one with nature never felt so good! |
| |
|
|

|
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 3:20 am
|
|
|
|
|