|
|
kathaksung
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
|
 Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:34 pm
|
 |
|
428. Liquid explosive and warning of "India bombing" (8/15/06)
Liquid explosive bombing is not newly invented. There was a "Bojinka" plot which said that Al Qaida prepared to use liquid explosive to bomb 11 US air-liners over the Pacific Ocean in 1995 .
The question is why Al Qaida hadn't carry out "Bojinka" then or since but delayed it until 11 years later? Why US intelligence didn't ban liquid in carry on luggage in 1995 but now make a fuss?
Because the biggest mind behind Al Qaida is the Inside Group. You can see so said "Al Qaida attack" all benefit to the ruling class, from motives to timing. "911 attack" justified for the Mid-east war by Bush. "Bali bombing and French tanker bombing" aimed to push Australia and France to support Iraq war. "Madrid bombing" aimed to help in election. "London bombing" was used to justify a coming "terror attack in US on 9/24/05". What advantage did Al Qaida gain from these bombings? None. Except a self humiliation that Islamic are savage. (or anyone can tell me some advantage Al Qaida gain from these bombings?)
Banning the liquid luggage is a deliberate. The more inconvenience travelers have, the more hatred they have on Al Qaida. People will believe it all caused by Al Qaida when there is a new attack happens in US. It's a psychological operation - a pre planted mind.
Another psyop purpose is to demonize Pakistani. The arrested 2 dozen suspects in this case are Pakistanis (or ethnic Pakistan). In message "423. Mumbai bombing (7/25/06)" I concluded that there is a "Pakistanis terror cell" in Bay area, and the core one of coming US bombing will be in California (especially in San Jose) related to Mumbai bombing.
The World Journal on 8/11 reported, "New target, New Deli and Mumbai" said, The US Embassy in New Delhi warned Americans that foreigners, possibly linked to Al Qaida, were planning a series of bomb attacks in these two big cities.
The two cases in continuing two days may prove my two conclusions in message #423: a Mumbai related bombing attack will happen in Bay Area. The "terrorists" are Pakistanis.
_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it. |
| |
|
|
Ellyn
Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 4458
|
|
Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:13 am
|
|
|
In response to kathaksung's message, I think that mr. jones' signature quote is quite appropriate:
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and thus clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." |
| |
|
|
Free World Order
tagged & banned
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU |
|
Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:23 pm
|
|
|
Blair only has the support of less than 2 million now. Remember only 8 million ever vote in a UK general election! Fewer than in totalitarian Nazi dictator countries. But, hey, EU and UK is almost officially there with that kind of government with all those policies having been made into the EU constitution that has not yet passed. Blair does want to force it through he says but he can't he won't be in power so the next puppet will have to try with it against a population of 87% that are anti EU.
Sunday, August 20th, 2006
Blair ‘feels betrayed by Bush on Lebanon’
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/blair-feels-betrayed-by-bush-on-lebanon
Simon Walters
The alliance between George Bush and Tony Blair is in danger after it was revealed that the Prime Minister believes the President has ‘let him down badly’ over the Middle East crisis.
A senior Downing Street source said that, privately, Mr Blair broadly agrees with John Prescott, who said Mr Bush’s record on the issue was ‘crap’.
The source said: “We all feel badly let down by Bush. We thought we had persuaded him to take the Israel-Palestine situation seriously, but we were wrong. How can anyone have faith in a man of such low intellect?”
The disclosure comes ahead of a mini recall of Parliament to allow MPs to vent their fury over Mr Blair’s handling of Israel’s War with Hezbollah and whether the recent terror plot in Britain was affected by his role in the Iraq War.
Foreign Affairs Minister Kim Howells, who has criticised Israeli attacks on women and children, is to be summoned before an emergency meeting next month of the Labour-dominated Commons foreign affairs select committee.
The highly unusual move to allow a Parliament evidence session during the summer recess mirrors emergency meetings called after the July 7 bombings in London.
The rift between No10 and the White House stems from British anger that Mr Bush failed to do enough to pursue the ‘road map’ to peace between the Israelis and Palestinians, which he approved, at Mr Blair’s instigation, on the eve of the Iraq War.
“We have been banging on at them for three years about the need to address the Palestinian problem but they just won’t engage,” said a senior Government insider. “That is one of the reasons there is such a mess now.”
It is understood Mr Blair hopes to undertake a highly controversial one-man mission to the Middle East when he returns from his holiday, including a trip to War-torn Lebanon.
Until now, the Prime Minister has given Mr Bush 100 per cent backing on all foreign policy issues since the Iraq War in 2003. But Mr Blair’s refusal to distance himself publicly from the White House’s all-out support for Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah guerillas in Lebanon has enraged Labour MPs and several Ministers.
However, a Downing Street official said: “We believe our best approach is to use our influence with the American government to persuade them of the importance of making progress to achieve peace in the Middle East.”
Mr Blair’s advisers say his portrayal by critics as Mr Bush’s ‘poodle’ is a travesty and claim he gets results by hammering out their differences in private.
But they do not deny that, behind the facade of public support, Downing Street’s patience with Mr Bush has never been stretched so far.
The decision by the foreign affairs committee to stage its emergency debate on September 13 - after Mr Blair opposed calls for a full recall of Parliament - is a further reflection of backbench unrest.
MPs have been demanding that the Government explains its stance on the crisis, which saw Mr Blair back Israel’s use of force against Hezbollah militants in Lebanon which has left hundreds of civilians dead and thousands homeless.
Mr Howells will be questioned over the Government’s handling of the crisis, which has seen the Cabinet deeply divided over Israel’s actions. He will also be asked to update MPs on the latest UN peacekeeping efforts which will see thousands of international troops deployed into a buffer zone on the Israel-Lebanon border.
Labour committee member Eric Illsley confirmed that the committee would take evidence from Mr Howells on September 13. He said: “There has been a public clamour for a full recall of Parliament.”
Meanwhile John Prescott has been involved in another foul-mouthed incident over Tony Blair’s policy on the Middle East, it was claimed last night.
He is said to have had a heated exchange with Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer, one of the few Cabinet Ministers to defend Mr Blair’s stance on Israel’s War with Hezbollah, when the conflict was raised during a Cabinet meeting and Lord Falconer denied that Ministers had disagreed on the issue.
Mr Prescott, one of the Ministers who led the revolt, allegedly snapped at Lord Falconer: “Of course they f****** did, you were f****** there.”
Comment: Even though this article suggests 12 Million support Blair I think only 2 Million or less do! I speak to normal mind numbed slaves from time to time and they believe these terror attacks and plots are fake now even! Yes, they have started to doubt the lies.
Only 20% Of Britons Believe Blair On Terror Threats
Neo-Fascists need to stage real attack to reclaim credibility and obedience
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 22 2006
A figure that is both telling and foreboding - that only one fifth of British citizens believe the Blair government is telling the truth on terror alerts - increases the chances of a staged attack to reinforce the notion that Islamo-Fascism is a real danger and not the invention of a ruthless Neo-Fascist government that has all but abolished freedom in the United Kingdom.
A Guardian/ICM poll today reveals that just 20% of British voters believe the government is telling the truth about the threat to bomb transatlantic airliners using liquid explosives - meaning 80% of the country do not trust Blair and the war on terror agenda. Blair's re-election itself was carried with a majority of just 33% and since only half of the country actually voted, that means only just above a quarter of British citizens actively support their government.
The fact that a significant majority of British citizens are completely distrustful and skeptical of their government's motives coalesces with gradually building anger in Britain over continually increased interest rates, mortgage and loan repayments, energy prices, government taxes, allied with resentment concerning overzealous bureaucratic infringement on personal behavior such as hosepipe bans and water regulation.
This crescendo has not gone unnoticed and the Blair cabal will do everything within its reach to manufacture fearmongering distractions, including staging another terror attack in London, attacking transport systems in major cities, or releasing bio-weapons targeting their most organized and effective opposition - the farming community which is based mainly in the north. The 2001 Foot and Mouth outbreak led directly back to Porton Down, the government's own bio-weapons research facility.
The government has lost most of its credibility in the arena of terror alerts after the fiasco of the Ricin attack that never was, the non-existent Manchester Utd bomb plot, the artificial Canary Wharf fairytale, the brutal slaying of innocent Brazilian Charles de Menezes, and the botched Forest Gate raid. All the more reason on their part to allow one to 'slip through the net' and stage an event to re-invigorate the flagging war on terror.
Blair's tenure in office, hailed in 1997 as a bright turning point for a country downtrodden by decades of dogged Tory reign, leaves a legacy characterized by the complete abolition of the rule of common law - replaced by a ceaseless barrage of suffocating control mechanisms and freedom of speech death knells.
Blair has created over 3,000 new criminal offences during his time in office - one for every day of his tenure and six times the amount created by Tory predecessors John Major and Margaret Thatcher. Allied with a raft of authoritarian anti-terror legislation, social behavior mandates and hate speech restrictions - ridiculous measures such as criminalizing the nomination of a neighbor to turn off your house alarm have also been introduced.
The so-called 'liberal' Blair has instituted a police state that obliterates anything the traditionally imperious Tories could ever get through.
In addition to the frenzied lawmaking, Blair has overseen the abolition of jury rights, handing cases likely to last over 3 months to the dictate of a single judge, criminalized any protest not authorized by the government under the Serious Organised Crime Act, mandated the entry of any protester into a terror database upon police questioning, created glorification of terror laws that are so sweeping they could apply to any form of free speech, eradicated habeus corpus by introducing house arrests and ever-increasing time lengths of detention without charge, attacked the notion of guilty until proven innocent by imposing curfews for under 16's, supported the use of intelligence knowingly obtained from torture in Uzbekistan and allowed the use of British airports for the 'extraordinary rendition' of terror suspects, created framework for the introduction of mandatory ID cards and implemented a national DNA database that stores records for eternity even if the suspect is acquitted of their crime.
Using the fear of terror, Blair has presided over the destruction of liberty in Britain and the final act may be another devastating attack to herd the sheep back into their pens and leave the path clear for a Tory takeover and a continuation of the same Neo-Fascist doctrine.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org |
| |
|
|
xiando
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 33
|
| Thanks! Keep it coming
Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:37 pm
|
|
|
I haven't really looked that deep into this one yet myself.
I made a small page called Police in Britain uncover suspected terrorist plot and that's about it...
Kind of funny..
I posted a short reply saying "It's all fake - like the whole war of terror.. go read 1984 and then research 9/11" in a major Norwegian forum immediately after this story broke adn I got a ton, many pages, of attacks calling me crazy..
OH AMAZING! I WAS RIGHT! ALL STAGED! What a SHOCK!
Nobody who actually researched 9/11 could see this as a fake..
This was of interest and value:
The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2006/08/the_uk_terror_p.html
quote:
None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for quite some time.
In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.
What is more, many of those arrested had been under surveillance for over a year - like thousands of other British Muslims. And not just Muslims. Like me. Nothing from that surveillance had indicated the need for early arrests.
(..)
We then have the extraordinary question of Bush and Blair discussing the possible arrests over the weekend. Why? I think the answer to that is plain. Both in desperate domestic political trouble, they longed for "Another 9/11". The intelligence from Pakistan, however dodgy, gave them a new 9/11 they could sell to the media. The media has bought, wholesale, all the rubbish they have been shovelled.
_________________
xiando
The TorrentChannel - download 9/11, NWO & Chemtrail videos - Coming soon: NeoConTrails! The movie! |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 4:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
