|
|
kathaksung
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
|
Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Tr
 Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:44 pm
|
 |
|
Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Truth
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/020407_b_Pilot.htm
Monday April 2, 2007
Every day, additional military and government people come out for 9/11 truth. The latest is Col. Guy S. Razer.
Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force fighter pilot (F-111, F-15E, F-16, B-1, F-18, Mig-29, and Suu-22). Flew combat missions over Iraq. Former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program.
Col. Razer’s statement:
"After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.
The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse."
We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.
We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!"
_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it. |
| |
|
|
kathaksung
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
|
|
Fri May 04, 2007 7:05 pm
|
|
|
News said an oil tanker with 8600 galloons of gas burned down highway 580 . It's a black operation to cover up 911 attack.
Another motive of this created event is to cover up the 911 plot. To prove a fire could melt steel. It is a case of killing two birds by one stone. But it's not the motive only that makes me conclude it was a planned crime.
1. Timing: The newspaper said, "In the early morning hours, the freeways were nearly deserted." (Mercury News, April 30)
What is that "early morning hours"? 3:52 am. It was night that most people were in deep sleep. I can assure you, no outsider had the opportunity to witness the event. (Of course, exclude those prepared witness. Feds used to have "reliable witness" to prove their framed case. Such as Moussaoui to 911) At 3:52 am in week-days, there still may be chance that some one happened to drive by. Feds made it on Sunday. 3:52 am on Sunday, a most deserted time for freeway. A safest time to create an artificial accident.
2. The damaged overpass was just above highway 880. The tanker happened to burn right underneath at that point. The fire would have burned in open air if the oil tanker crashed a little bit farther or a little bit lesser. Was it a lottery winner that crash took place at the spot?
3. Location. A place with busy traffic: the exit of the Bay Bridge, where highway 880 and 580 going through. The best place for propaganda because hundreds of thousands of people drive by there every day.
A right accident (to reason the WTC collapse) at a right place (just at the cross point where a fire can burn the upper overpass. A place about half million commuters pass by every day, a best place for propaganda, ) at the right time. (the most deserted time of highway, so rare people could witness it)
So Bush and his accessories can beat the drum this time. It could be an accident. How rare the chance is, there is still lucky man who win the lottery or unlucky man who was hit by a thunder.
It also could be a black box operation to justify 911 attack. If you believe 911 was an inside job. Then this group has the motive to cover it up. If you think it was not a coincidence that the WTC was changed hands three months before 911 attack( to enable that group to set up explosives inside the building), then you have full reason to recognize it was not a coincidence too on timing and location for this event. It is another covert job to cover up the 911 event.
_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it. |
| |
|
|
kathaksung
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
|
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:24 am
|
|
|
Proof Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11; 3 simple points
blueridge
Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:52
75.109.16.198
1. Usama Bin Laden's absolute, unequivocal, immediate denial in Pakistan press after he was blamed:
“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people…
...What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United States? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. " --Osama bin Laden interview with Ummat, 28 September 2001
Sources: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan - Friday, 28 September 2001 - pages 1, 7. - Source: BBC Monitoring Service
<http://www.public-action.com/911/oblintrv.html>
[this writer found it shortly after, along with others, and retained original links to Ummat's article to this day]
2. The government's spurious video evidence, claiming that he "boasted" (while he denied it above):
“It’s bogus,” says Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies program.
The video is further examined here:
<http://ahmedismailibrahim.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/proof-that-bin-laden-had-no-links-with-911-and-the-bin-laden-tape-is-a-hoax-video/>
3. The testimony of the FBI:
a) The FBI "Mosted Wanted" terrorist poster on Bin Laden does not show that he is "wanted" for 9/11. <http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm>
b) and here is what they have stated:
“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”
--Rex Tomb, FBI spokesman, in interview with Muckraker Report
<http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html>
[Muckraker also did a follow up article in further confirmation]
The FBI is well informed of the video (proves Muckraker Report), but, nonetheless, still considers that there is "no hard evidence" to connect Bin Laden with 9/11. Thus again, the video cannot be considered said evidence.
People can argue with the FBI about this if they want, instead of us.
There is therefore no sustainable evidence except politically-convenient allegation and propaganda, to make such a false and spurious claim. This also kills the idea of Al Qaeda which they claim also was connected directly with Bin Laden. The BBC documentary "Power of Nightmares" documents that Al Qaeda was "an invention" of the U.S. government, and that videos of Bin Laden "were faked for the western media", with "militants" called in for the purpose.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKYID2ACdKs>
“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over”
--Joseph Goebbels, Nazi propagandist
The Zionist controlled media, and neocon-controlled Republican and cow-towing Democrat "leading candidates", continue to "stay on message", true to the principles of propaganda quoted above. It is clear that this was created by the same neoconservatives and pro-Israel Zionists both inside and outside the government. Motive? To hijack the powers of government, and to reorganize it to sustain it for their purposes (i.e. thus Homeland Security, to defend a post-revolutionary government after a soft coup). They will not stop unless the public loudly rebukes them, and legally stops them, and their political machinery, for repeating blatant lies to hijack government policy and powers.
--------------
Proof that Bin Laden had no links with 9/11 and the Bin Laden tape ...
By Ahmed Ismail
... is clearly guilty of obstruction of justice at best, high treason and conspiracy to mass murder at worst. Since the FBI now tells us that Osama Bin Laden is "not wanted for 9/11 because there is "no hard evidence" connecting him to ...
Ahmed Ismail - <http://ahmedismailibrahim.wordpress.com>
_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 9:58 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
