|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
 Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:14 pm
|
 |
|
FYI.
I'll be watching the 'Chemical Contrails' program tonight and writing a review on it that I will post here at CTC and DBS right after the show.
Good or bad I'll let you know what I think of it.  |
| |
|
|
greenman
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 172
|
|
Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:20 pm
|
|
|
if anyone has the abliity to record it and upload it to google video that would be great and very appreciated.  |
| |
|
|
myrrh
Joined: 14 Mar 2002
Posts: 106
Location: Eastern Central Indiana |
| Discovery Channel program a bust
Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:12 am
|
|
|
I know Louis A will review this program on here, so I won't; I knew when they opened the show with Patrick Minnis that it would be "scientists say" as opposed to "believers say", and it was. No revelations, no new theories, no valid research or testing. The only "testing" they had done was on jet fuel, to see if it showed evidence of "added chemicals or substances". Of course it did not. I never thought that chemtrails were a result of jet fuel; who did?
They did have some awesome footage of trails, though. People will be more aware now. |
| |
|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
| DELETED
Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:25 am
|
|
|
DELETED DUE TO THE POLICY OF CTC IN LETTING THE DEBUNKERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS LIKE "FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe" AKA, "MAY41970' OVERRUN THE SITE.
FOR THAT REASON I WILL NOT HAVE MY POST ARCHIVED HERE AND I NO LONGER WISH TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE
Last edited by Louis Aubuchont on Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|
starman1
Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 1498
Location: Earth |
|
Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:43 am
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads up Lou,
good to know they ran they show, I'll be looking for it out here on the west coast. Best we can hope for now is more heads will be looking up and at least questioning what they are seeing in the skies. |
| |
|
|
Jeanie
Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
| Slanted Report
Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:45 am
|
|
|
Yes, it was on and definitely slanted, an explanation for everything saying conditions in atmosphere affects length of existence, and behavior of, "contrails"... Admit to use of alumium oxide and sulphur dioxide also chaff dispensed to track wind currents and affect detection on radar. Admit to cloud seeding over California for 50 yrs, the supposed purpose, to extract water from the atmosphere for use here on earth. That's a laugh. Also, spraying over the eye of a hurricane, claiming failure, to lessen effects of storm.
Patrick Minnes, and Joseph Golden (weather modification "experts"comment what is thought of as chemtrails are nothing more than contrails, with great increase in air traffic as reason for so many trail sightings.
Much time was spent on proving there is no aluminum in jet fuel. We were "privileged" to view scientists doing their testing with all their expensive scientific equipment.
Nothing was mentioned about apparatus attached to planes depositing whatever into the air we will breathe. Eye witness can plainly see the trails are not coming from the engines. If this were not a sneaky underhanded operation there would be no need to service their planes with noise lessening equipment. This Discovery report is exactly what I expected, a big nothing...
A woman by name of Roslyn Peterson has a web site regarding trails over California, lot's of info. http://www.californiaskywatch.com/
Well folks, you can all rest easy now as all is well.  |
| |
|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
| DELETED
Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:54 am
|
|
|
DELETED DUE TO THE POLICY OF CTC IN LETTING THE DEBUNKERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS LIKE "FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe" AKA, "MAY41970' OVERRUN THE SITE.
FOR THAT REASON I WILL NOT HAVE MY POST ARCHIVED HERE AND I NO LONGER WISH TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE
Last edited by Louis Aubuchont on Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|
myrrh
Joined: 14 Mar 2002
Posts: 106
Location: Eastern Central Indiana |
|
Fri Feb 23, 2007 2:13 pm
|
|
|
I agree, Louis, exposure was the desired result. Even if a person did not become convinced by it of the true nature of chemtrails as we all are, they certainly can see that there is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. As discussed on the show, particulates of whatever kind which form a "cloud cover" do have climatological and and meteorological effects, whether purposefully or not. It was interesting that the Climatologist, Dr. Wayne Evans, brought out that the cirrus layer does not reflect heat, but radiates it instead, and that the cirrus level is where these plumes are occuring.
They certainly avoided discussion of military applications!
The photos were very good, and a lot of them.
More eyes on the skies, one hopes. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3, 4
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 11:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
