|
|
Lulu
Joined: 22 Dec 2000
Posts: 2501
Location: right here |
Orb and Trail
 Sun Mar 03, 2002 1:46 am
|
 |
|
This just sent to me, would love to share with all of you. Taken 2/25/02 above Ridgefield OR. First appeared invisible...then voila...visible...but like no plane I've ever seen!
Enlarged 400%...dark object as yet unknown.
Comments please...
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Lulu on 03-02-2002] |
| |
|
|
eyesopen
Joined: 25 Apr 2001
Posts: 663
Location: Nashville TN |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 2:29 am
|
|
|
That's just NORMAL orb traffic!  |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 2:35 am
|
|
|
looks like a distorted video grab of a airplane contrailing...
and not to play dueling orb pics with you...Lulu...but check this one out...
whoopse pic won't post..
http://www.tracers.8m.com/sightlink2.htm
------------------
T/S
[Edited 1 times, lastly by theseeker on 03-02-2002] |
| |
|
|
Deb
Joined: 04 Oct 2001
Posts: 163
Location: Plainfield, Indiana USA |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 4:02 am
|
|
|
Is that Ridgefield near Portland?
Since the weather at flying altitudes along the coast north past Vancouver was right for contrails that day, I would say it's a jet flying at a fairly high altitude contrailing. (just eliminating the most obvious clue) Also, depending on the camera's ability to capture a jet at 38,000+ feet, the photo may very well come out looking like something other than a plane. |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 5:29 am
|
|
|
quote:
Also, depending on the camera's ability to capture a jet at 38,000+ feet, the photo may very well come out looking like something other than a plane.
Huh? Funny, the trails came out looking like trails at the same altitiude. They didn't mysteriously turn into CD-roms of Flight Explorer to satisfy the debunkers emotional incapacity to deal with reality.
If you folks can manage not to get sidetracked by these type of diversionary arguements, you might find out that the military has been experimenting with various orbs. Some to test new advanced radar sytems, others are remote controlled and outfitted with cameras...
The other problem, of course, is that I and many others have seen these babies close-up and they sure as hell don't look like any damn airplane...
http://chem11.proboards2.com/index.cgi?board=Discussion&action=display&num=1012595782
[Edited 3 times, lastly by Chem11 on 03-02-2002] |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 6:12 am
|
|
|
I looked at the pic chemster, and it looks like an out of focus plane leaving a trail....jeff rense is right people will believe anything these days...he just got done saying that most if not all orb photos are atomized water.
interesting discussion you and sux are having about debunkers..."military does not want to loose the debunkers"
lol
btw...could you add a few more pop-ups over at your place...geeze...
------------------
T/S
[Edited 1 times, lastly by theseeker on 03-02-2002] |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 6:37 am
|
|
|
First of all, I already TOLD YOU that I've seen these things up close and that thet they do not look even slightly like an airplane.
Secondly, your confusing those transparent 'orbs' with the silver spheres, which are a seperate phenomena. Atomized water (and more likely dusy motes) do not leave trails (con or chem).
You're other comments are unworthy of reply and are based on ignorance. IF you weren't such a continual pain-in-the-ass, maybe people would actually TALK to you and you'd learn a few things. MAYBE.
As it stands, you don't know what you don't know.
Lulu, that is an important photograph. I hope people take time to investigate the sphere connection further.
Why is it you have no problem posting your own UFO sighting, but you are entirely dismissive of photographic evidence that others present T/S? This isn't some cheesy Photoshopped prank and there are hundreds of photographs of these silver spheres.
Deal with it. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 7:01 am
|
|
|
listen, sux was your knight in shiney armour and God forbid I get in the way...
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/sprayboysflamecentral
IF you weren't such a continual pain-in-the-ass, maybe people would actually TALK to you and you'd learn a few things.
wow that really hurts chem...but seriously I don't click on boards to talk anymore it's pointless to go over the same old s!@# every couple of months or so...I like to read unusual stuff and plenty of that here, IT's not who's talking btw, IT's who gets heard ace...(make a note of that)
lulu asked for comments, I gave mine...if you don't like it, that's your problem...some may see Jesus in that photo...dig ?
I know what I seen was real...I sat and watched real air traffic literally haul ass away from the said area...
UFO sightings have gone up 42% in Canada...why do we not hear more of that from you chem, rather than wondering about my internet social life ?
------------------
T/S |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 7:34 am
|
|
|
And WTF is it that you think is in that photograph? Santa Claus?
If you are going to start a discussion on the identities of the posters on my forum (of which you have no room to make an informed opinion, from either a technical or..in your case..subjective perspective), why don't you start a thread on it here?
Instead of turning yet another thread into one of your trademark personal bitchfests?
The topic here is not your self-sustaining delusions, misconceptions and conjectures regarding everything under the sun (but containing only a cursory nod and quick dismissal of the topic being discussed).
It's orbs leaving CT's. Here's another:
http://www.home.mastersites.com/mega/OrbSprayerZoom.jpg
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Chem11 on 03-03-2002] |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 7:54 am
|
|
|
chem I'm sensing a lot of hostility from you...
personally I have traded enough derogatory comments with you too...
sooooo, until you get a handle on your hectoring, you can discuss your problems with someone else...
------------------
T/S |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 8:01 am
|
|
|
Finally got the hint, huh?
Get another.
 |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 8:26 am
|
|
|
300% zoom, solarized to bring out defintion and contrast...
My compliments to the photographer, Lulu. This is one of the clearest shots of a spheresprayer I've seen yet.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Chem11 on 03-03-2002] |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 8:29 am
|
|
|
only thing I get from you is a headache...
ahh, so those are chemclouds eh...other photo, I'll give other than a "film development" error...what is it...
------------------
T/S |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 8:48 am
|
|
|
Another example of some rather advanced technolgy that is connected with the chemtrail phenomena, it would seem. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sun Mar 03, 2002 8:57 am
|
|
|
conjecture...
------------------
T/S |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2, 3, 4 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 11:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
