|
|
Free World Order
tagged & banned
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU |
Bin Laden Construction Company Worked on the WTC
 Thu May 03, 2007 1:35 am
|
 |
|
It turns out Bin Laden did not bomb the WTC complex as the government and/or corporations (corp elite-secret societies) did but actually did build it! Interesting? Bin Ldden built the WTC, hmmm...
____
Bin Laden Construction Company Worked on the World Trade Center!
Paul Laffoley, an architect who went on to become a famous modern artist, and his most-famous work, THANATON III. I have a framed copy of this extraordinary piece of art, which I enjoy greatly.
BIN LADEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WORKED ON WORLD TRADE CENTER!
by Kentroversy
Synchronicity brought the work of Paul Laffoley into my life. As I enjoy all things that make me THINK, I was blown away by this man's modern art depictions of many hard-to-explain concepts. Laffoley just so happens to be represented by KENT GALLERY in New York City -- which was synchronicity # 1. The second was when Laffoley's name came up again in the short-lived TV series, DISINFORMATION, of which only four episodes were ever made for the UK's CHANNEL 4 TV network, and here in AmeriKa, for the SCI-FI CHANNEL. After viewing this on DVD, I had to know as much as I could about this visionary artist, Paul Laffoley.
This sent me on a bit of a quest ...
Recently, I was listening to an extensive in-depth interview with Laffoley on Radio Orbit, with host Mike Hagan. The interview was from a few weeks back, on February 21, 2007. To my surprise, at just over the thirty-minute mark of the interview, Laffoley begins talking about his varied experiences working as an architect. In the early 1960's, he described working for Emery Roth and Sons, a prominent New York City architectual design firm.
During the next ten minutes or so, Laffoley described working for Roth, which was one of the many design and construction firms working on this massive ten-year project. Of the construction companies working on the WTC project, Laffoley announced, was the massive multi-billion dollar BIN LADEN CONSTRUCTION CO., which is the family of the individual who was originally BLAMED FOR the attacks on 9/11.
Osama Bin Laden, or as I call him, Osama Bin Dead. I call him this, because the reasoning is simple as to WHY he has never been found in the past five-plus years by the Bush regime -- Osama is dead. And he died around the time 9/11 itself came to pass, and this is THE REASON for all the FAKED BIN LADEN VIDEOS that have been shown at various times in the past.
I mention this at this particular juncture in time, because we are about due for another installment of these faked Bin Laden videos, here in AmeriKa, as Bush Jr. and his neo-Nazi puppetmasters are trying to claim that there is a resurgance of Al-Qaeda -- or as they are more aptly named -- Al-CIAeda. This is because Al-Qaeda is a completely manufactured enemy of this boogeyman war on terror that THEY have said will be a 100 year war (against an enemy that does not, and has never existed, and will never exist in the future).
And, you know what?
It has NEVER been mentioned in all the 9/11 books, documentaries, and films -- that the Bin Laden family helped build the WTC complex.
I personally have many of these in my own reference library, and I have to say that this was news to me, and I am numbered among those who can be labeled as an EXPERT in all matters related to 9/11 -- simply because of the extensive research that I have done on this subject and its' related adjuncts.
But, it really wasn't the FACT that BIN LADEN CONSTRUCTION worked on the project that was the real bombshell of what Laffoley had to say in this interview. The bombshell as it were, concerned the explosive charges that were built into the buildings AS PART OF THEIR DESIGN! Laffoley commented on how shocked he was when he was asked to think about HOW he would build in explosive charges, to take down the building complex, BEFORE it was even built!
Therefore, all those people who are trying to damage the cunning research of the 9/11 Truth Community (a community that does not rightly count Alex Jones among its' members, by the way!) by saying that they could have never slipped in those charges some time before 9/11, need to understand that those demolition charges that brought down WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 were there all along! Furthermore, it was Marvin Bush who played a big role in the security of the WTC complex, and between the Bush's, the Bin Laden's, Larry Silverstein, and the peculiar behavior of both Hillary Clinton and Rudolph Giuliani -- we have all the major players in this up to their necks!
The reader might wonder WHY they might build-in explosive charges at the time the buildings are built. This is a natural thing about which to wonder. However, it is a FACT that the buildings in NYC are packed in tighter than sardines in the midst of their worst supermarket fate. So, it is axiomatic that the designers of these buildings (and their insurance companies) are looking for ways to bring down these buildings in a manner that will not endanger any of the surrounding and neighboring buildings.
Their answer is found within CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS, which most of us have seen via news footage of the implosions of old hotels and casinos in Las Vegas. Before 9/11, one could find television specials of these controlled demolitions on the HISTORY CHANNEL and other cable channels like them. Post-9/11, I cannot recall seeing one of these specials being aired, which I personally believe has been done to draw our attention AWAY from these ideas.
Now, WHY would they want to wire a building for a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, when it could be taken apart legally? Well, the owners of the WTC investigated this, and the cost would have been more than what the buildings were worth. In fact, the aspect of 9/11 that I have heard NO ONE else mention, is that it appears to be the single largest case of INSURANCE FRAUD that this country has ever seen!
Besides, they met several objectives at once, in bringing down the towers in the way they did. They got their new BOOGEYMAN, now that the Soviet regime had been toppled, or so it appeared at the time. However, if Osama Bin Laden was supposedly responsible for 9/11, then what is this recent 'confession' from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed all about? Could it be that the Bush regime really know that they CANNOT produce a LIVING Osama, so they switched the blame to this new unwitting accomplice? These are just a few questions that you should be asking yourself about 9/11.
The curious reader can listen to the interview of Paul Laffoley by Mike Hagan, as the link and the time codings are BOTH listed below.
Listen, and have your mind blown!
First-person prima facie evidence by someone who was himself there, working on the WTC project ... also, please do NOT forget that the company tasked with the clean-up of the WTC site was CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, INC.!!
If that is NOT a display of consciousness of guilt, I do not know what else it could be!
http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2007/04/bin-laden-construction-company-worked.html
For intact links to articles, additional info and images visit the above URL.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org |
| |
|
|
Free World Order
tagged & banned
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU |
|
Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:43 pm
|
|
|
FAUX NEWS, BUSH,. CO. Not even in the same league as CNN, nope CNN is a truthspeaker as far as comparisons go with BUSH, CO's FAUX NEWS. FOX News has always been corporate whores! They suck up to them all including Monsanto. Censoring anything that may show truth!!! Everything is filtered out before screening by corporate PR firms - a FACT.
Asbestos Fireproofing Might Have Prevented World Trade Center Collapse
Thursday, January 18, 2007
By Steven Milloy
In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, I suggested in this column on Sept. 14, 2001 that many lives could have been saved if asbestos fireproofing been used in the World Trade Center.
Though controversial at the time, my view has gained in validity since then, according to “Eco-Freaks” (Nelson Current, 2006), a new book by John Berlau.
Berlau, a fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (a think-tank with which I am affiliated), details in one chapter of “Eco-Freaks” the series of events leading up to the decision to stop using asbestos fireproofing in the WTC and the post-Sept. 11 testing of the WTC-type fireproofing by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Well after construction began on the WTC towers, the campaign of Mount Sinai Hospital’s Irving Selikoff to scare the public about asbestos reached World Trade Center construction manager Rino Monti, who became worried in May 1970 that office workers might be exposed to asbestos from air passing over exposed asbestos fireproofing that had been sprayed on to the buildings’ structural steel.
Selikoff and Monti pushed for asbestos substitutes, vouching for their safety and effectiveness – even though the substitutes had barely been tested against fire, according to WTC documents from the 1970s.
Although Monti ordered basic testing of the substitute fireproofing materials by Underwriters Laboratory, he apparently didn’t wait for the testing to be complete before they were used in the WTC towers – that’s according to a report on the WTC collapse by the Commerce Department’s NIST.
As a result, asbestos fireproofing was only used up to the thirty-eighth floor of the first WTC tower and not at all in the second. Continuing asbestos hysteria eventually resulted in much of the asbestos eventually being ripped out of the first tower.
Berlau recounts how the effectiveness of asbestos fireproofing was proven during an intense Feb. 13, 1975 fire that burned for more than three hours in the elevator and utility shafts from the ninth to nineteenth floors of the first WTC tower – an area where asbestos fireproofing was still intact at the time. Despite the fire’s intensity – it burned nearly everything, including telephone panels and wiring, and got hot enough to blow out windows – the asbestos fireproofing contained the fire so that it did minimal damage to the rest of the building.
A subsequent fire analysis report from an engineering firm noted that the fire, “while reported in the press to have been very hot, did not damage a single primary, fireproofed element.”
Berlau’s report of the post-Sept. 11 fireproofing testing by NIST underscores the chilling possibility that the Sept. 11 WTC building collapses may have been delayed if not preventable had asbestos fireproofing been used.
Despite the huge fireballs caused by the two planes crashing into the WTC towers each with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel, the fireballs didn’t explode or create a shock wave that would have resulted in structural damage, according to a follow-up report by the Federal Emergency Management Administration. NIST’s report says that the steel didn’t melt as the temperature in the WTC towers never rose above 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit (steel melts at 2,750 degrees). Steel will, however, start to bend and buckle at temperatures as low as 600 degrees if the fireproofing is inadequate.
The NIST report concludes that, “The WTC towers would likely have not collapsed under the combined effects of the aircraft impact damage and the extensive, multi-floor fires that were encountered on September 11, 2001, if the thermal insulation had not been widely dislodged.”
So how do we know that asbestos fireproofing likely would have performed better than the non-asbestos fireproofing?
Post-Sept. 11 testing by NIST indicates that the original testing of the non-asbestos fireproofing was wildly inaccurate. In simulations by NIST, the non-asbestos fireproofing was far inferior to asbestos in terms of melting points and ability to keep fire from spreading.
“Some of the non-asbestos fireproofing probably just burned off,” writes Berlau.
When the non-asbestos fireproofing was attached to a steel pushrod to simulate the steel columns at the WTC and exposed to fire, NIST found that as the temperatures increased, all the non-asbestos fireproofing shrank and lost contact with the pushrod before reaching maximum test temperature. Another set of tests indicated that the thermal conductivity of non-asbestos fireproofing was much higher than asbestos “spreading heat to the vulnerable steel,” Berlau reports.
NIST was not able to test the original asbestos fireproofing because it is no longer available, “but we know – from more than a century of fire tests – that asbestos almost certainly would have performed better,” writes Berlau. Part of that knowledge, of course, comes from the 1975 WTC fire which appears largely to have been contained by asbestos.
The irony is that there is no evidence that anything was gained in terms of health benefits by not using asbestos fireproofing. The original concerns that indoor air would be contaminated by passing over asbestos fireproofing were unfounded. City University of New York mineralogy professor Dr. Arthur Langer told Berlau that the sort of asbestos spray originally used on the WTC was tested at airports in the 1990s.
“This stuff was so damn good that this stuff did not release fibers – even with the vibrations from the airplanes and so forth,” Langer said.
The subtitle of “Eco-Freaks” is “Environmentalism is hazardous to your health” – a point Berlau backs up with chapters on the tragic DDT ban, the collapse of the levees in New Orleans and others. It’s a point that we should all take to heart as the modern environmental movement continues to use fear to advance its dubious and potentially deadly agenda.
Steven Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and CSRWatch.com. He is a junk science expert , an advocate of free enterprise and an adjunct scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute .
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,244698,00.html
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org |
| |
|
|
Free World Order
tagged & banned
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU |
|
Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:49 pm
|
|
|
Top Austrian TV station airs 911 Mysteries: Demolitions:
http://911blogger.com
http://911blogger.com/node/11067
Austria's Largest TV Station to Broadcast 9/11 Mysteries.
From Christopher;
Hello!
I just want you to be notified, that ORF1, which belongs to our national broadcast service and is the most viewed TV-Channel in Austria, is going to air the entire documentary "911 Mysteries Part1: Demolitions" !
The program is scheduled on September 6, at 22:25 (Central European Time).
Information on the ORF-Website (german):
http://tv.orf.at/program/orf1/20070906/420245001/239414/
I still can't believe it! This is so important, because the documentary is dubbed german and the speakers are well known "documentary-voices". For many people here in Austria/Germany/Switzerland there has always been a insuperable language-barrier to essential "Truth-Materials". This will be an enormerous boost!
Greetings from Vienna,
Christopher
FWO: COMMENT:
Why is it German(s)/speaking country('s) have always been way ahead of us with this kind of stuff? Stupid really is that in the UK people think they have so much liberty tahn any other country when our media censors everything! In Germany they do not, many publishers specialise in such areas as respected companies.
WOW: when even France is way ahead of us on the same day of 9/11 their TV stations reported it as an inside job! Of course I never believed what was being brainwashed to us on UKcrapTVvision and my friends on family on the day of 9/11. But the worst part for them was that I had expected it for over a year and even forewarned some of them about it.
The people never forget!
UK peeps: are you all still scared of what others think when you speak out! Lose the fear! Or lose freedom! (modern freedom we founded of over 800 years) Who cares what anyone thinks, the truth and freedom prevails all. Unless it is failure you want.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 12:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
