|
|
GAS_MASK

Joined: 19 Jul 2002
Posts: 151
|
Will Someone Please Explain This?
Mon Jul 29, 2002 12:48 pm
|
|
|
"Oh Lucy, you gotta lotta splainin' to do!"
Cheers! 
[Edited 2 times, lastly by GAS_MASK on 07-29-2002] |
| |
|
|
Unhappy Trails

Joined: 10 May 2002
Posts: 256
Location: Seattle, WA |
Mon Jul 29, 2002 1:14 pm
|
|
|
Goodmoanin Gas mask! Great shot there, did you take it? What altitude do you think that is? Looks pretty low to me. |
| |
|
|
WFETZER

Joined: 11 Jul 2002
Posts: 15
Location: Hopland, CA, Mendocino |
Mon Jul 29, 2002 1:33 pm
|
|
|
Where was that photo taken? I cannot see the ground how could you tell if it was low? Maybe she was on a hill...hahah
|
| |
|
|
GAS_MASK

Joined: 19 Jul 2002
Posts: 151
|
Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:33 pm
|
|
|
Heh-heh.....
Unfortunately, I didn't take that photo, I pulled it from Cliff's site.
But it is most definitely a breathtaking shot of the infamous wingtip-to-wingtip megasprayer.
I just wanted some non-believers' comments about the montrosity pictured above.
(This should be interesting.)
Here's something to compare the top photo with: LINK
Cheers!
[Edited 6 times, lastly by GAS_MASK on 07-30-2002] |
| |
|
|
eyesopen
Joined: 25 Apr 2001
Posts: 663
Location: Nashville TN |
Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:21 pm
|
|
|
I think Raven's photos are the best. He had the telescope rig and really got some close ups. Check out the featured photos in the new image database. He sent me a bunch that I scanned, I'll maybe post some... |
| |
|
|
GAS_MASK

Joined: 19 Jul 2002
Posts: 151
|
Tue Jul 30, 2002 11:25 pm
|
|
|
I ran that top photo past the Air Disaster forum, and this is what someone by the name of Louis (I believe he his a pilot) emailed me:
----------------------------
Looks like a Boeing 767-300 to me!
>
> ...never seen such a thick contrail before, though!
>
> Was it over an area of high heat/humidity?
-------------------------------
I told him I'd have to check when and where Cliff took the photo and what the weather conditions were at 150mb.
|
| |
|
|
Bonehead9
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 176
Location: suburb of Chicago, IL US |
Wed Jul 31, 2002 3:25 am
|
|
|
Some real chemtrails:
Or how about a real "megasprayer"
Notice that the spray bars don't go from wingtip to wingtip, as that would interfere with the aileron (the control surface)
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Bonehead9 on 07-30-2002] |
| |
|
|
Bonehead9
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 176
Location: suburb of Chicago, IL US |
Wed Jul 31, 2002 3:41 pm
|
|
|
You missed my point, A-T. First and foremost, the plane has to be able to fly. Any equipment added for what ever reason can not interfere with the ability of the plane to fly. Equipment added to a plane also must not interfere with the planes flight control surfaces (either externally block the movement of the surface or internally interfere with the actuators and hydraulic systems). Nor should it compromise the structural integrity of the aircraft.
Have you ever looked at the wing of a modern jet plane? The entire trailing edge is taken up by control surfaces (flaps and ailerons). The unimpeded operation of these surfaces is critical. How do you expect a plane fully loaded with "chemicals" to take off without the use of the flaps?
An airplane in flight causes a myriad of air pressure changes to occur immediately adjacent and behind it. These changes are caused by the wings (generating lift, wingtip vortices etc.), the engines (the increased pressure of the exhaust is what generates the thrust.), and the tail ssurfaces (they have to steer the thing).
Add to this the localized air turbulence caused by the passing of a plane, throw in the moisture and soot from the engine exhaust, and you have a perfect cloud forming machine. This is especially true if you have a condition known as super saturation where the relative humidity (RH) is greater than 100%.
Do you notice the wing tip vortices on either side of the contrail in Gas mask's picture?
When I looked at that picture, I came up with two possible explanations:
Theory 1) The contrail is the result of physical and thermodynamic processes caused by the movement of the plane through the air. These scientific principles underling these processes have been established for over 100 years and are currently taught in college and even high schools around the country. In addition, at the time the picture was taken, the plane was flying through common atmospheric conditions that are conducive to the formation of contrails. These atmospheric conditions have also been studied and documented for decades.
Theory 2) The plane is part of a super secret program run by an unknown agency, government or space aliens and consisting of thousands of people who are systematically spending billions of dollars a year to spray the Earth (just under major air traffic corridors, however) with unknown chemicals for unknown reasons. This program has gone on for about five years and so far no tangible evidence or credible testimony has been produced to expose it to the public at large (the sheeple). In addition, the plane has been extensively modified with millions of dollars of high tech spray equipment. This equipment has been ingeniously added to the plane in such a way so as to make it indistinguishable from other planes, yet it does not compromise the performance characteristics of the aircraft at all.
I think I will go with theory number one, thank you. |
| |
|
|
David
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 1381
|
Wed Jul 31, 2002 5:09 pm
|
|
|
Nero fiddles while Rome burns.
Can someone explain this.
Why is the board commited to arguing with these debunker fools. On and On it goes. They are keeping any real progress from taking place with their constant denial of ANYTHING important. Read this site to see what garbage they spew about the people and issues posted here and other boards. http://pub31.ezboard.com/fcontrailsandchemtrails22884frm1?page=1
They have not the least shred of respect for anyone, including themselves. They, in all their vast wisdom, would debunk Jesus Christ if he made a personal appearance.
Who gives a rats ass what they do or do not think, is it important to you, me or the fact that this country is going down the toilet. Or the fact that this administration is selling us out to the NWO? Or the fact that the spray program is ongoing, deadly and killing the planet? Or the fact that our civil rights are going out the window? I think not.
Thread after thread is polluted with their stench.
They are doing what debunkers do, derail, sidetrack and deny.
Is the opinion of people like canex(minnis),pacer,bonehead,maverick, seeker, dippy deb or any of the other debunkers important?
It is an insult to our intelligence to let them continue... |
| |
|
|
Bonehead9
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 176
Location: suburb of Chicago, IL US |
Wed Jul 31, 2002 8:05 pm
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by eyesopen:
Same thing here Bonehead????
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/000195.html
Yes, absolutely. Remember that super saturation can occur when parcels of warm moist air rise up into the atmosphere. Haven’t you ever heard of thermals? How do you think that thunderstorms form? There are definite boundaries to thermals (ask any sailplane pilot) |
| |
|
|
eyesopen
Joined: 25 Apr 2001
Posts: 663
Location: Nashville TN |
Wed Jul 31, 2002 8:43 pm
|
|
|
well BH, how I see it is that it was a heavy chem day when I took those and also that is a mighty giant wing to wing "contrail"... |
| |
|
|
WiseQuakker

Joined: 21 Aug 2000
Posts: 141
Location: Wherever I happen to be at the time |
Thu Aug 01, 2002 10:28 am
|
|
|
quote: Pinhead said:
First and foremost, the plane has to be able to fly. Any equipment added for what ever reason can not interfere with the ability of the plane to fly. Equipment added to a plane also must not interfere with the planes flight control surfaces (either externally block the movement of the surface or internally interfere with the actuators and hydraulic systems). Nor should it compromise the structural integrity of the aircraft.
Have you ever looked at the wing of a modern jet plane? The entire trailing edge is taken up by control surfaces (flaps and ailerons). The unimpeded operation of these surfaces is critical. How do you expect a plane fully loaded with "chemicals" to take off without the use of the flaps?
Man, we’d better put the University of Colorado in touch with you right away before they crash their little Cheyenne...
From photo collection at the RAP Press Room
quote: Pinhead said:
Remember that super saturation can occur when parcels of warm moist air rise up into the atmosphere.
Yes, it can...
quote: Pinhead said:
Haven’t you ever heard of thermals? How do you think that thunderstorms form? There are definite boundaries to thermals (ask any sailplane pilot)
Gee, I didn’t know it was that simeple. And all this time I thought it might also be convective instability, real mean lookin’ cold fronts, stuff like that... And, if I’m not mistaken, glider pilots prefer the kind of thermals that do not threaten runaway cloud formation. They like it when the atmosphere is a little drier...
_____________________________
“We should be on our guard not to overestimate science and scientific methods when it is a question of human problems and we should not assume that experts are the only ones who have a right to express themselves on questions affecting the organisation of society.” — Albert Einstein, May 1949......
[Edited 2 times, lastly by WiseQuakker on 08-01-2002] |
| |
|
|
GAS_MASK

Joined: 19 Jul 2002
Posts: 151
|
Thu Aug 01, 2002 6:06 pm
|
|
|
Nice find, Wisequaker!
Just out of curiosity, what kind of equipment is mounted to that plane's wing?
Are those the cloud seeding flares?
[Edited 4 times, lastly by GAS_MASK on 08-01-2002] |
| |
|
|
WiseQuakker

Joined: 21 Aug 2000
Posts: 141
Location: Wherever I happen to be at the time |
Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:47 pm
|
|
|
Correct, GAS_MASK. The photo description reads, “Seeding with hygroscopic flares over Monclova, Coahuila Mexico”...
_____________________________
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” — George Orwell......
|
| |
|
|

|
|
Goto page 1, 2 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 1:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|