|
|
the_last_name_left
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 14
|
 Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:10 am
|
 |
|
FUI - I suspect you just wish to draw me into an effort at debunking your belief thereby getting myself banned from here (as a debunker.)
So I shan't bother. And I'm not that interested anyway.
Suffice to say - you recognise a complete lack of photographic evidence and yet conclude "How suspicious there's no photographs!?"
Have you ever wondered why there's no photographs of angels? Isn't that suspicious?  |
| |
|
|
FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe
tagged & banned
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 197
|
|
Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:54 pm
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by the_last_name_left
FUI - I suspect you just wish to draw me into an effort at debunking your belief thereby getting myself banned from here (as a debunker.)
No, because they don't ban debunkers from CTC like they used to. The policy was changed last year. There used to be a bunch of threads called CTC Changes, but they were taken down.
quote:
So I shan't bother. And I'm not that interested anyway.
That's ok. That's a refreshing change of pace from the career debunkers like Jay Reynolds, Epoxynous, and jazzroc who spend a lot of time on something they say is a crazy hoax.
And you aren't gonna believe this anyway, but I didn't know you were logged in and responding to may41970 when I shut off your account. Later on I lifted the ban, but you didn't get the word or something. I admit I was too quick with the banning. But here's an analogy. Say you started your own forum on fascism, and pro-war bigots showed up at your place. Would you not consider banning them? But anyways, stuff happens.
Tuddi, the name who showed up after yourself, it turns out he is jazzroc at youtube. When I stumbled across that truth, that is when I rebanned your username.
Seeing that we are both antiwar and antifascism, perhaps we should just let this thing drop. Or you can continue to go after me. That's ok too. There are tons of people on the internet attacking myself. It is not something I worry about, because then interested people can just look into it if they want.
quote:
Suffice to say - you recognise a complete lack of photographic evidence and yet conclude "How suspicious there's no photographs!?"
Have you ever wondered why there's no photographs of angels? Isn't that suspicious?
I said there is photographic evidence of airliner contrails, nice up-close in our faces. But the photos of the chemjets are grainy at best. That's what I find to be suspicious.
Two things stand out to me.
1) The "contrails" above seem to be coming directly out from the tail area, not from the engines where we would expect. Of course, watching the video over looking at the photos makes this point clearer.
2) A very similar looking jet, perhaps the same type can be seen soaring way above the chemjunk, but there is no visible exhaust at all. That is strong evidence that chemtrails are real.
_________________
http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 1:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
