|
|
perverted_introvert
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 2006
Location: Chicago |
Petraeus Report - 9/10/2007
 Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:11 am
|
 |
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/11/wiraq211.xml
quote:
A positive report would help President George W Bush win funding from Congress to continue the war with high troop numbers; a negative message could see the president's Democrat opponents bring the forces home much sooner.
But as the four-star general, who leads an army fighting with the most hi-tech equipment ever used in combat, began to speak, his microphone failed.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20689476/
quote:
full-page New York Times ad run by the anti-war group Moveon.org mocking Petraeus as “General Betray Us” — and Democrats irate that the Republicans kept bringing up that ad.
We all need a little comedy, here's the right-wing, FOX news take on it:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296360,00.html
Lawmakers' Minds Made Up Before Gen. Petraeus' Testimony?
Mine was! This guy is one of many figureheads meant to mislead the public into following the will of the Elite. Will he be the next Donald Rumsfeld? Maybe a Wolfowitz? I don't believe a word they say anymore. It's a sad day when Americans have learned to distrust their "elected" officials.
Why are we in Iraq again?
_________________
“To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee” |
| |
|
|
kathaksung
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
|
|
Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:46 am
|
|
|
Soap play (9/11/07)
Surge is working.... Surge failed..... tamed sheep argue in web site. The inside group is happy. They push out a general to flame the debate to make it a soap play.
The fact is: the surge is for Iran war. Bush needs more troops for the war so they invent a "surge". That's what you saw in follow stage:
1. When Democrates who newly controlled the House and said they would fight against Bush's Iraq war policy suddenly surrendered in May and released the Iraq war fund to Bush. The Inside group has made up their mind to start war on Iran. The politicians follow up the order.
2. The troops were increased in Iraq the following month. It was planned to be used for Iran war but the surge is in the name to surpress the insurgence in Iraq.
3. When the troops was ready, there was a three months plan for the war. (July to September)
(1) Bush needs an excusee to attack Iran. A massive terror attack will justify it.
(2) The terror attack is likely a dirty bomb attack or a real nuclear bomb attack. To justify the source of nuclear material, they had a secret deal with Russia. Russian leader Putin was invited to Bush's private ranch in Main in early July. After that, Russian escalates its cold war action by sending its strategy bombers to Guan and England. It's an operation to cover up the secret collaberation of two countries.
(3) The terror attack was planned in early September. That's why we saw terror case in Germany and Bin Laden released his tape at that time. We also knew the inside group planned to make a fortune in stock market on that terror attack .
4. When that plan seems go soured, they let out a general to prolong the stay of US troops in Iraq. The Inside group still prepare for another new plan.
It's a pitty to see the tame sheep busy to debate on surge - a fake issue.
Here is their three month plan:
Re:
U.S. Terror Attack - 'Ninety Days at Most'
Jul 02 10:20:33 2007
Counterterrorism expert Juval Aviv spoke with FOX Fan Central about what Americans can do to protect themselves in case of a terror attack.
Do you believe another terrorist attack is likely on American soil?
I predict, based primarily on information that is floating in Europe and the Middle East, that an event is imminent and around the corner here in the United States. It could happen as soon as tomorrow, or it could happen in the next few months. Ninety days at the most.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161962,00.html
Quote, "$4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks
Anybody have a clue as to what these 'investors' are expecting?
August 26, 2007
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2007/08/45b-bet-on-another-911-within-4-weeks.html
_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 2:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
