Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
What scientists propose is purely insane

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Ecology

Author Thread
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
What scientists propose is purely insane PostTue May 20, 2008 8:06 pm  Reply with quote  

This is something scientists have proposed for many years, decades in fact. As early as the late 1960's and during the 1970's scientists say cutting down trees is good for the environment and will mean more rain because trees dry it all up. Of course this is all wrong, trees actually do suck up moisture from deep under ground but if they did not rainfall would be much less and all springs would dry up in nearby areas. This is proven to be true from deforestion.

Article here:

Solution For Global Warming: Poison The Air, Cut Down Trees

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/052008_warming_solution.htm
http://snipurl.com/29u2i [timesofindia_indiatimes_com]
This is not debating which produces more oxygen the forests or the oceans, in any case many species will go extinct if we continue deforesting, including humans.



quote:
Climate change alarmists have never been apt to shy away from courting controversy with their dire forecasts of coming environmental apocalypse, but their latest "solution" takes the biscuit - they want to pollute the air with sulphur and cut down pristine beautiful old growth forests to stop global warming!

No you didn't read that wrong - scientists really are proposing to obliterate majestic canopies of forest that are hundreds of years old while pumping the upper atmosphere full of an acid-rain causing pollutant, changing the very color of our serene blue skies, all in the name of saving the environment.


As almost always we have a situation opposite of what we are told and so it is treated the totally wrong way as a solution!



quote:
"Australian scientist Tim Flannery has proposed a radical solution to climate change which may change the colour of the sky," reports The Age.

"Professor Flannery said climate change was happening so quickly that mankind might need to pump sulphur into the atmosphere to survive. The gas sulphur could be inserted into the earth's stratosphere to keep out the sun's rays and slow global warming, a process called global dimming."


Flannery says the process of adding sulphur to jet fuel in aero planes needs to happen within 5 years, but admits, "The consequences of doing that are unknown."


Other links.....
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/letters/article3718033.ece
Even though there was global cooling from the 1940's to 1970's. And again from 1998.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/05/080519-hurricanes.html
http://wcco.com/local/fairbourne.global.warming.2.728710.html
http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/news/letters/story.html?id=a8b8cacc-7258-42aa-9e2d-620863e87fc1
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050908/content/01125113.guest.html
http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=4fc8f2e2-4dcb-4fe6-8c3f-1469bb54d487
Just taken from google - through non selective process, there are pro global warming ones - way more! Go get if that is your thing.

Want to stop global warming - then pay 60% of your income in tax! Have no babies and live in a cave or somewhere wild. Just don't breathe.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Richard Burgeson


tagged


Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 613
Location: Erie,PA
They want to spay sulfur PostWed May 21, 2008 12:56 pm  Reply with quote  

http://www.professionalequipment.com/toxic-gas-sulfur-dioxide-so2-detector-toxiltd-54-44-03/personal-safety-gas/

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts116.html

http://forums.macresource.com/read/2/489170/492691

http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=5565

http://analusis.edpsciences.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/analusis/abs/1999/04/s020499/s020499.html

Then the news that they want to spray sulfer into the atmosphere.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2008/041008_geo_engineering.htm

http://bravo9.com/peakoil/last-barrier-to-climate-collapse-40056.html

Now the new top returns for "is sulfur toxic"

http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/pyrethrins-ziram/sulfur-ext.html

http://www.webelements.com/sulfur/biology.html

Do they think we only read the first article? How stupid do they think we are? Sulfur compounds of all types would abound free to chemically react with other compounds all over the Earth not just the atmosphere. How stupid is Congress? Then in a statement in and article featured link at Coast to Coast am it went on to say then they would have to remove carbon from the atmosphere. I challenge them go ahead with that part, show us you can even begin to do that feat you morons. Take lets say a measly 1/4 of a million tons of carbon from the atmosphere and show it to us.

Keep in mind people, the first batch of carbon removed will be from the most saturated point and I'm telling you they can't do it. They destroyed the forests, they filled the ocean with toxic waste and it's the plant life that removes the carbon from the atmosphere. For these clowns doing the bad science, they would have to liquefraction vast volumes of the atmosphere. Draw off the CO2 and C2O and chemically remove the carbon under several atmospheres of pressure while it is a liquid. They could even begin to do it. And I don't like the lying creeps that are trying to change the data on the toxicity of sulfur compounds. I also noticed that the toxicity of polymers showed up in the search under sulfur. 31,000 scientists say no to global warming. We have to ignore the lie and get the truth out there. The CO2 they are complaining about is nontoxic. We need to replenish the forests and we need to clean the oceans. They say we can't clean up the plastic mess in the Pacific, what they mean is they can't make a profit cleaning the mess in the Pacific. They can't make a profit planting trees either and that's why it's not being done. We had a paper plant here in Erie that reported they planted millions of trees. Were are they? Another lie purpatrated on the people. They were bought by International Paper and moved out because the resources were depleted. The site they were on is still a toxic waste dump. Come on up to the Allegany National Forest and try to find a decent Ash tree. That will give you a life long career.
_________________
Thomas Jefferson. " Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't."


Last edited by Richard Burgeson on Wed May 21, 2008 1:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
PostWed May 21, 2008 1:14 pm  Reply with quote  

There is also another problem (among all the health issues) - when spraying Sulfur into the atmosphere if too much is sprayed it will have the opposite effect. It is not unknown as they tell us but actually very well known.

When too much sulphur dioxide is sprayed it will detroy the ozone.

How about some sulphuric acid rain?

Spraying sulphur into the atmosphere will definitely make the climate go worse.

I watched the BBC Drama-Documentary series last year on weather modification and spraying sulphur dioxide gases into the atmosphere via aircraft was one of the methods. And the BBC were honest about the effects of spraying the aerosols.
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread12291.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0073m68
http://snipurl.com/29x9j
[www_google_co_uk]

Some that read this news may think it is hot air to give this some media spot light so people get used to weather modification but it is already legal for non warfare or non hostile uses according to UN rules, the only thing that may stop it if the government wanted to do this would be lawsuits from citizens and international lawsuits because regional and national weather modification effects the whole worlds climate.

Nice post Richard, I agree! Very Happy


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1995/press.html

If they do spray sulphur into the atsmosphere we know they want to kill the biosphere, global ecosystems and people.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Richard Burgeson


tagged


Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 613
Location: Erie,PA
We have members from all over PostWed May 21, 2008 2:15 pm  Reply with quote  

I hope we have enough for this. We really need to hear from members that live in Canada that have suffered through acid rain. Also we need to hear from members from strip mined areas about Sulfur in the water.

The bodies of water absorb CO2 from the atmosphere and the plants convert it to oxygen, also the sea life live on oxygen absorbed from the atmosphere. What happens when sulfur dioxide in sufficient quantities is available for absorption? Acid rain, yes one of the many byproducts from reactions to other Earthly compounds. The ozone layer I hadn't considered, that's a scary one. I did consider possible unforeseen reactions with some of the chemicals in the chemtrail mixtures though. And with enough acid rain you get a permanent PH change in the soil that could be devastating to both plants and animals. Well hope to hear from people that have problems from Sulfur already in their environment. I think they have already been spraying Sulfur. I have no proof but, if we hear about it they usually have been doing it for years.
_________________
Thomas Jefferson. " Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't."
 View user's profile Send private message
Cloudy Skies





Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 122
Location: UK
PostWed May 21, 2008 3:20 pm  Reply with quote  


quote:
A much-discussed idea to offset global warming by injecting sulfate particles into the stratosphere would have a drastic impact on Earth's protective ozone layer, new research concludes. The study, led by Simone Tilmes of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), warns that such an approach might delay the recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole by decades and cause significant ozone loss over the Arctic.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/earth_climate/global_warming/
 View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:04 pm


  Display posts from previous:      




© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum, All Your Base