Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
eco_Solutions

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Ecology

Author Thread
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
eco_Solutions PostThu May 22, 2008 4:07 pm  Reply with quote  

ecoSolutions are needed faster than ever before to combat global warming-global cooling balance scenario. We have proof that global cooling occured from the 1940's to the 1970's - we have proof CFC's damaged to Ozone that lead to man made global warming in the 1970's to present times - we have proof that Russians developed weather modification technology that was sold to Americans to repair the Ozone layer! We also know that the ozone is healing rapidly now. Some part man some nature. I am able to smell O3 on chemspray days very often - I smell O3 on clothing or people after they step indoors on a heavy spray day. I am able to ionise water when taking a normal glass of water outside ona heavy chemspray day if ionised aerosols are used. This part sounds really conspiracy thoeryist, eh. And we thought people realised the world became an open lab with contamination flow.

Please name your ecoSolutions for clean high tech sustainable world, then organised ways we can realise changes by our own direct actions - even if it means forming our own organisations, now some charities already have proposed funds for eco-solutions and do have corporate donations but guess what, no real solutions are possible unless we use freedom force in corporations - by actually moderning simple technology already available to use to utilise to cleanup old tech in industry. And we then do not need as high eco taxation or glonal taxation but agreements on how to reach global standards, I know we have ISO standards but why are they not even stricter for the puprose and benefit of all, not just some select elite. taxes like Norway has is not the solution, corps can afford it but people cannot so they starve to death or commit suicide or feed the leechers of the planet - private bankers!

See proceeding information in the PDF file and also post articles if you want on real solutions - take the cause on directly - not the symptoms.

http://www.divshare.com/i/4560686-64f

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE OF NEWS ON ECO WARFARE!
We killed it or we soon will.......

http://www.divshare.com/i/4560686-64f

Global Warming Solution STINKS! _ this is the cause - not the solution!
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/08/71613
FIGHT IT!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080519092205.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080514131131.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080519134306.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2007/0407-possible_fix_for_global_warming.htm

Time the media encouraged solutions instead of doomtalk!


Time more of us took action - CHANGE!
http://www.divshare.com/i/4560686-64f


http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/24/6591
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22818963
http://www.mongabay.com/brazil.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/feb/27/climatechange.forests

My first main proposed solution is ecological because it means we can reforest land that is currently used for farms and build on some of it - if we use organic vertical farming.

http://www.verticalfarm.com
More $$$ + Cleaner planet + less global warming + less greenhouse gases. When using organic vertical farming.

Sulfur Cycles!
http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1348.html


There is an un-natural imbalance caused by us! Stop deforesting and reforest instead, farm vetically and clean up tech! nature is the future and nature will be used as technology in the future! Some of this may or may not include nanotech. Another thing we need to closely monitor and lobby - regulations and legislation on such sectors before it becomes a biotech scenario of failure.

If the UN is to prove itself in any of the IPCC agenda it has to crack down on China's and India's industry big time. Sanctions are in order by U.S., UK standards if it were not for the benefits of the private elite sector that is. The USA is not the worlds biggest polluter, Asia is! And in Europe - Germany! Now China and India do not have proper controls on pollutions like USA and European countries so they seriously undermine the measuring of pollution, and if they really bothered - they wouldn't they still get away with breaking even their laws. It is true some industry standrads in China are better than the US when it comes to pollution levels permitted but when we know Asia has regions spanning miles of thick smog we had back in the 1800's we know surely who pollutes more here. If Asia is not with us in this then no one is. So why bother at all. The whole global warming racket is flawed - they have been exposed far too many times to ignore. But we are causing global ecological imbalances by systematically killing nature.

Time for some solutions then. Don't look to the UN.

I registered at CTC as a fleeing environmentalist - because they all hate solutions - I offered them many solutions using technology and they ignored it all! They wanted less population and restrictions on human movement. I am not alone, several leading politicians left Green organisations and polical parties for the same reasons. All these people are brainwashed by doomtalk-sayers. We have the solutions ready to use - so don't delay in encouraging others. The world economy would truly boom if we did this. And all tech sectors would be retrofitted and restructured within 50 years in every country if the will was there.

All this means a possible powershift, extinction of the old elite. Equality for all and zero poverty! Arh, we can't be havin' that can we.

If you look at financial markets and analyse them in an educated way you realise all you have to go on is either inside info or historical data - just like global warming - the only insiders though in global warming sector is that the tax they receive. And still offer no solutions to prevent it from happening again and still all the tax money does naff all to stop the ongoing so called symptoms or causes of global warming - so there we have it global warming activists - the biggest hypocrites around.

Moving averages of historical data on climate for future predictions or uisng weathe models, please do not make me laugh and go back to your unsuccessful speculation - trading! You will lose again! But not in global warming, trade CO2, offset carbon and never fight the causes you often label!

Entertainment:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/steigerwald/s_493626.html
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Did-global-warming-stop-in-1998.html
http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=forex%20moving%20averages&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5282/is_200411/ai_n24285573/pg_2

http://mc-computing.com/qs/Global_Warming/Bad_Arguments.html

Historical data people! Is no indication of the future. It is the law to state this for every trader or investment banks products. Wait long enough and present data becomes historic and changes! All the time it changes, doh, now what is the future, oh there is goes - it changed, what cycle is next i wonder..... Very Happy of course there is contradictions, we only see the near future and can only predict this far using best math we can, that is how you become rich in trading or in global warming lobbying. So look at it this way, neither of us are completel wrong, but the trader aspect is more reliable because traders know the limits of analysis where as scientists ignore it ask for more money and continue studies while the climate continues to change, if a trader did this he would be in jail by now because he had only lost money.

Oh the sun has no influence on climate doe sit not, very funny, then why try to block it out by spraying aerosols. Very funny indeed! LIARS! Why even bother having a sun then, we could still grow crops with no sun....dream away. $#@#!.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
ecological warfare - ecological terrorism PostFri May 23, 2008 6:10 pm  Reply with quote  

Weather Warfare
A New World Order weapon could trigger climate change
MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY

The important debate on global warming proceeding under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change. In addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the world's climate can now be modified by a new generation of sophisticated "non-lethal weapons." In fact, both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the world's weather.
In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of "Star Wars," otherwise known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability to potentially trigger floods, droughts, hurricanes, and earthquakes.
While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used yet, surely the UN should be addressing the issue of "environmental warfare" alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilizing the agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

Owning the Weather
Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the November 2000 Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) raised the broad issue of "weather warfare" or "environmental modification techniques" (ENMOD) as relevant to an understanding of climate change.
The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists, and US business lobbies has centered on Washington's outright refusal to abide by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto protocol. The protocol calls for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 5.2 percent to become effective between 2008 and 2012. (For details, go to www.globalwarming.net/gw11.html.) Yet, the impacts of military technologies on the world's climate aren't an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington's strategic and defense objectives.
World-renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon." As The Times of London reported on November 23, 2000, "The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods."
In the 1970s, former national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted in his book Between Two Ages, "Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised ... . Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm."
Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, has outlined several types of "unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies. According to a 1999 report in Intelligence Newsletter, he refers directly to "weather war," indicating that the US and the Soviet Union had already "mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s." These technologies make it "possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar."
A simulation study of future defense "scenarios," described in a report by the Air University of the US Air Force, calls for "US aerospace forces to 'Own the weather' by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. In the US, weather modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels."

Bombarding the Atmosphere
Based in Gokoma, Alaska, and jointly managed by the US Air Force and Navy, HAARP is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the SDI. Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Space Vehicles Directorate, it constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating "controlled local modifications of the ionosphere."
In The Military's Pandora's Box, Dr. Nicholas Begich, a scientist actively involved in the campaign against HAARP, describes it as "a super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere (upper layer of the atmosphere) by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything - living and dead."
Bertell depicts HAARP as "a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet."
Although presented as a program of scientific and academic research, Begich notes that US military documents suggest HAARP's main objective is to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." Without explicitly referring to the program, the Air University study points to the use of "induced ionospheric modifications" as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.
According to Bertell, HAARP is part of an integrated weapons system with potentially devastating environmental consequences. "It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere," she notes. "It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction, which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature."
The military implications of combining these projects are alarming. The ability of the HAARP/Spacelab/rocket combination to deliver very large amounts of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, is frightening. The project, adds Bertell, is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer.
In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses. According to Begich, "HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays. Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people's brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out."
More generally, it has the ability to modify the world's electro-magnetic field. As Don Herskovitz explained in the August 1993 issue of the Journal of Electronic Defense, it's part of an arsenal of "electronic weapons" which US military researchers consider a "gentler and kinder warfare." According to Herskovitz, "electronic warfare" is defined by the US Department of Defense as "military action involving the use of electromagnetic energy."

Avoiding the Issues
According to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, "States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction." In addition, an international convention ratified by the UN General Assembly in 1977 bans "military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects."
Both the US and the Soviet Union were signatories to the convention, which defines "environmental modification techniques" as referring to any technique for changing - through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes - "the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere or of outer space." Yet, the UN, disregarding the 1977 environmental modification convention as well as its own charter, has decided to exclude climatic changes resulting from military programs from its agenda.
Responding to a report of Maj Britt Theorin, Swedish member of the European Parliament and a longtime peace advocate, the parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings on the HAARP program in February 1998. The committee's subsequent Motion for Resolution, submitted in January 1999, "considers HAARP by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to give evidence to the public hearing into the environmental and public risks [of] the HAARP program."
The committee's request to draw up a "Green Paper" on "the environmental impacts of military activities," however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to delve into "the links between environment and defense." In short, Brussels was anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington.

Fully operational
HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under SDI. From military command points in the US, entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. More important, the latter can be implemented without the knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost, and without engaging military personnel and equipment as in a conventional war.
To advance US economic and strategic interests, for example, it could be used to selectively modify climate in different parts of the world, resulting in the destabilization of agricultural and ecological systems. It's also worth noting that the US Department of Defense has allocated substantial resources to the development of intelligence and monitoring systems on weather changes.
While there's no concrete evidence that HAARP has been used, scientific findings suggest that it's fully operational. If so, it could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an "unfriendly nation" or "rogue state" with a view to destabilizing its national economy.
Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are already in crisis as a result of New World Order policies such as market deregulation and commodity dumping. Amply documented, IMF and World Bank "economic medicine" imposed on the Third World and the countries of the former Soviet bloc has largely contributed to the destabilization of domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade Organization have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified seeds on farmers throughout the world.
In that context, climatic manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or deliberate) would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national economies, destroying infrastructure, and potentially triggering the bankruptcy of farmers over vast areas. Surely, national governments and the UN should address the possible consequences of this and other "non-lethal weapons" on climate change.

Toward Freedom
Michel Chossudovsky teaches economics at the University of Ottawa and is the author of The Globalization of Poverty.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
Sun Activisty increases crop yields and prosperity + health PostFri May 23, 2008 6:13 pm  Reply with quote  

According to scientists of the past few centuries...
Sun Activity increases crop yields and prosperity + health

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3036032.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/953353.stm

The Ozone works well with the sun when not depleted, by absorbing harmful radiation particles and keeping the world cool and calm, but the balance can be swayed either way - cooler or hotter and this is actually now happening with weather mdoification experiments the Russia developed - ionospheric heaters, and O3 aerosol spraying applications (60 plus years ago), these technologies were first patented by Russia and later sold to American companies and used under defence contracts.




quote:
Ozone's equivocal role

She believes that ozone responds to changes in solar UV, but said the picture was complex.

Dr Haigh told BBC News Online: "How much the ozone responds, and where it changes, is crucial.

"In the upper stratosphere, about 50 km up, an increase in ozone will have a cooling effect.

"But about 20 km above the Earth, more ozone will act like other greenhouse gases, trapping IR radiation and enhancing warming.

"I think it's very unlikely anyway that the response of ozone to solar UV will be as dramatic as some reports have claimed."


Stop spraying O3 on us at low levels! I can smell it, yes I can! On some heavy spray days people smell of it.

Weather Warfare has to stop!

Think about the above article in the post above this one. Now why would they spray America so much, a free sovereign independent state? Hmm.....surely has to be for certain strategic purposes of control and power.

Ionospheric Prediction Services:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=ionospheric+prediction+service&meta=&aq=4&oq=ionospheric+

Some people will tell you the ionosphere has no effect on the climate just as silly global warming people say the gulf stream has no effect on the world's climate, haha, I can prove this with no science barely, and then go into advanced science - all you need is use a thermometer - go inland and go coastal and measure temperatures in the summer months and see the difference between inland and coastal areas during all time frames of the day for one week/month and then you will conclude the effect the gulf stream has on us! This works best in the UK where it is so close to us. The Ozone has a relationship as well, in fact all of the biosphere does, oceans, atmosphere - all ecocenters. They all inter-relate and have cycles. So arguments about the sun or gulf stream not effecting climate is complete and utter nonsense! A cave man knows better. Non of this is conclusive either way or not whether we contribute to global warmng or global cooling, but we certainly have ideas on how we may influence it or control it with 130 year old technology. You must know by know from historians that TPTB have weather control in their interests over the people. This is not new to us at all.


quote:
http://www.anthonares.net/gulf_stream_1.png


Ice melts, ice forms, ice melts, ice forms, what cycle are we in now, and how may we have contributed to this? What are the real causes and solutions.....what is the real agenda.....why have the causes not been dealt with when it threatens the balance of the whole planet.....who benefits from control of your life.....clouds/aerosols form clouds/aerosols disperse - the cycles goes on - man made or natural - the cycles go on and on, how long for is undetermined until present becomes historical - unless....we really do have full control over an immediate area for a predetermined time.

At the end of it the pro global warming and sceptics use the same material to debate what is what to an extent, only the global warming activists deny the gulf stream effects climate unless they say the melting of ice will cause a global - what - what? ICE AGE! Ouch, not global warming then. Well I guess it ebs and flows like anything in nature so do the ice formations of the glacias.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2005/dec/01/science.climatechange
How Sweet is nature, I mean we blow up the worlds biosphere and nature helps us out by re-cooling it to re-balance things for us, wow, now I kinda understand how the world controls its ecosystem in such a situation just as we adjusts as humans to poisons we consume on a daily basis, so how far can we go until we crack it at our own perils. How far is the cancer....

Lack of direct action aids the status quo people and is all that is necessary for evil to prevail.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org


Last edited by Free World Order on Sun May 25, 2008 11:45 am; edited 3 times in total
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
Real eSolution - Real For Real People PostSun May 25, 2008 11:02 am  Reply with quote  

The green environmentalists are being fooled by short term predicting climate models, of course if a little different data is input we would have Utopia or total destruction with some other input. A 7 year old will best explain this because they understand better than Global Warming cults.

Sulphur Dioxide

Is proposed to be sprayed into the atmosphere to combat global warming.

What it does:

Blocks the Sun out.

Depletes the Ozone layer gases.

Kills people through lack of nutritional vitamins we can only get from the sun, causes cancers.

Kills crops because they are unable to grow without sufficient sunlight, more sun the better they grow, more sun and rain like in India - even better still.

Now the UN say tropical climates are bad because they are caused by global warming, this is such nonsense. India has a great climate and grow crops they export all over the world, cutting trees down is bad people! It will cause global cooling and global warming on a global scale if deforestation continues, you won't understand how it can cause both, will you, not unless you research the relationship of the biosphere, stop splitting things up and see them as they are naturally!

So basically the environmentalists if fooled by false science will accept aerosolling of the atmosphere using Sulphur Dioxides to block the sun out and deplete the Ozone layer, cause malnutrition, famine, and global extinction. The very same ingredient they are against from coal and chemical plants - they would say lets spray in the biosphere!

Insane!

We have the solutions people! China, India, Russia and America can cleanup now and profit no end!

Clean Tech for the taking, America can be the center of fossil fuel tech - that is safe and clean.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4468076.stm

Environmentalists hate to be proved wrong - so they lobby government to stop this development! At the worlds perils. You see feminists do kill people!

Africa and America can export their coal to the world and make $$$ in the process of being ethical IF they promote, fund and build clean tech power plants for the European Union - slave states. And the EU are not stupid enough to ignore the clean coal technology even, they will be lobbied further to accept it in the coming years as the real solution to nuclear power.

http://www.africasia.com/services/news/newsitem.php?area=africa&item=080525032057.l664rmm6.php

http://www.heraldtimesonline.com/stories/2008/05/24/news.qp-2403009.sto

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/national-coal-council-study-calls,405980.shtml



If coal can be clean - can oil?

Oil is more sustainable than biofuels that cause starvation/famine and global price rises for all products. I never thought I would have a good word for coal or oil production but if we can transform plants, refineries into eco-tech retrofitted new tech I am all for it, I won't be crying around talking about doom. Only solutions!

We have tech for clean coal but did you know that oil production is greener than biofuels? Did you know that growing biofuels actually results in more damage to agriculture industry and severe deforestation than any oil production does? On a much greater scale it does and has! Do not ignore murder when you see it!

No I am not an oil agent, I just look at things in a balanced way and see the wrong in the world, soon the EU will change their policies on these, they are being forced to look at the facts now. If we focus on solutions such as clean coal and clean agribusiness, we can then look to focus on clean oil and natural safe chemicals instead of synthetic, where possible. First energy demands need to be taken care of so the economy can prosper and we can finance more eSolutions.

It is because of biofuels the Amazon is being deforested to monolithic proportions.
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
PostSun May 25, 2008 11:29 am  Reply with quote  

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/30544.html


quote:
Scientists said recently in the journal Nature they can radically speed up the underground bacterial fermentation that turns Canada’s tar-like Athabasca sands into natural gas at far less cost and with far less environmental pollution. This is huge global news because the world has about six trillion barrels of such heavy oil, more than 20 times the proven oil reserves in Saudi Arabia. They’re focused in Canada’s Athabasca, in Venezuela’s Orinoco tar belt, and in the oil shale of the U.S. Rocky Mountains. All may be economically recoverable with bacterial refining.

_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
PostSun May 25, 2008 11:32 am  Reply with quote  

Clean Coal in Pakistan.

http://pakobserver.net/200805/25/Articles03.asp

The fuel of the next 2000 years? Well the fuel of the next few centuries anyway.


quote:
Coal is presently worlds fastest growing fuel particularly in the developing countries. Coals importance can be judged from the fact that it provides 26 % of primary energy and 40 % of world electricity supply. Coal has gained special importance due to growing concerns for energy security prompted by the abnormal surge in world oil prices to over $120 per barrel of oil, mounting tensions of the western countries with Iran, interruptions in the international supply network of gas from Iran and Russia and ongoing stand off in the Arabian Gulf. Coal offers a solution which is still found in abundance locally in most parts of the world. World coal consumption is expected to increase by 74 % from 2004 to 2030. World trade of coal is expected to increase about 40 %, from 800 million tons in 2007 to 1122 million Tons in 2030. Coal share in world energy consumption is expected to increase to 28 % by 2030 but its share in power generation is expected to remain 41 % roughly at the current level. Coal as an indigenously available resource has a strategic importance and is worlds fastest growing fuel.

Today China is worlds largest producer as well as the biggest consumer of coal which accounts for 78% of its total energy requirement. Realizing importance of coal many countries in other parts of the world have switched over to coal to meet their energy needs. India, Indonesia, Germany, USA, Australia and UK are among those countries that have embarked upon new coal based power plants. USA is worlds second largest user of coal whose 60% requirements for energy are met with coal.

_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message
Free World Order


tagged & banned


Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU
PostSun May 25, 2008 11:55 am  Reply with quote  

Vertical Farming News Updates:

http://www.verticalfarm.com/NewsUpdates.aspx

Environmentalists want trees to be saved and more to be planted? For all we use to be produced in a sustainable fashion? Then start supporting real solutions now.

http://www.verticalfarm.com/NewsUpdates.aspx
_________________
http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org
 View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat Feb 24, 2018 4:23 am


  Display posts from previous:      




© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum, All Your Base