|
|
PHANTOM911
Joined: 31 Oct 2001
Posts: 341
|
MSTM (makes sense to me)
 Thu Oct 10, 2002 5:21 pm
|
 |
|
I posted this in the chemtrails thread yesterday and no one seemed to have a response, so I'm posting again in case it was missed by all.
Question to all:
If in fact these are not normal contrails and are some sort of chem stuff, and we, the living breathing organisms inhabiting the earth are indeed being sprayed, wouldn't air samples from any elevation show whatever chems are in the air? I understand sampling the trails at the elevation being laid would be more concentrated, but if this stuff is reaching us at ground zero, then wouldn't sampling the air at say mouth level be enough to show what IS in the air we breathe?
People here have been discussing getting a pilot and plane and equipment and going up there for samples of what they think they are breathing down here on the surface. Why not just find someone in the scientific community who believes the trails are chem not con and test the air we breathe down here? This would have to be a more realistic indicator of what we are breathing than what's being spread overhead at however many thousand feet. It should also be alot more inexpensive for collection and testing of samples. Surely I am not the only one who's thought about this am I?
Let's hear your thoughts on this people. Are any of you really trying to get at the truth or not?
|
| |
|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
|
Thu Oct 10, 2002 5:37 pm
|
|
|
Yes imagine there would be alot of chemspray at "mouth level"but with all the other pollution in the air i feel it would be better to obtain a concentrated sample from higher elevation. |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
|
Thu Oct 10, 2002 6:39 pm
|
|
|
Phantom911, you are right. But so is emfx13. The issue with collecting air samples at ground level is that even if you find something interesting, there is really no way to know if it was CT related. It could have come from anywhere. And even if one is willing to assume (and risk being wrong) that something interesting did come from a CT, no one looking for scientific evidence will make that assumption. Thus the desire for insitu. |
| |
|
|
PHANTOM911
Joined: 31 Oct 2001
Posts: 341
|
|
Thu Oct 10, 2002 7:29 pm
|
|
|
Location, Location, Location
With reports coming from all over the country, samples could be taken in MANY locations including rural areas far from any city contaminants, and compared. If the same thing is being sprayed all over it would be evident from cities to farms to mountains to deserts. If something were amiss in all these locations tested where trails are being reported, then 2 and 2 could be put together. At least if something were to be found, it might start to get more interest from the scientific, healthcare and political communities who would then pick up the ball and get things rolling. This debate will go on forever until someone shows some initiative and gets off their ass and does something along these lines. All this bunking and debunking is getting nowhere fast. It's also easy to lose interest and just say FUC% it, there's nothing I can do about it, and continue to watch the show above wondering why someone doesn't do something. I'd kick in my $20.00 just to see someone try instead of just all this ranting and raving about something which no one really seems to know anything about. Hey, it's just a suggestion, and it seems to me to be the least expensive way to get something started. And wouldn't people like to know what they're breathing at ground level no matter where it comes from? If it can't be proven that there are things in the air we breathe here on the surface of this great planet of ours that are foreign and harmful to us, what chance is there that anyone would be concerned with what's in the atmosphere at 20 to 30 thousand feet? I don't see why ground zero wouldn't be the place to start to make people aware that there's something in the air.
Just my own rantings. |
| |
|
|
DeeHumanEyes
Joined: 09 Oct 2002
Posts: 5
|
|
Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:47 pm
|
|
|
Hi, I think testing is a good idea, but where would you get an unpolluted sample? This stuff seems to blow around and travel, the sample would have to be taken in a populated area where no chemtrails have been sprayed. I am wondering if there is such a place? Maybe what we need is a network of observers to map out where this is happening and where it's not. I find it difficult to get most people to look at the sky for more than a few seconds a day, if that. They will look if I am standing next to them pointing, but later on if I ask them they either forgot or glanced up for a second or saw some but didn't observe the event. It seems only a small percentage of people are actually capable of observing the sky with any degree of consistency. I have two people in other locations I can count on to observe the sky. Sometimes. If we all had that then we could come up with a map and put "hits" (chem activity) and "misses" (no chem activity). If a location is consistently missed and isn't downwind of spraying that would be the clean area to compare a heavy chem area to. We have to all work together, I think. Just my idea on this.
------------------
In youth, we learn;
In age, we understand. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 5:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
