|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
A SKY SHIELD TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING?
 Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:32 pm
|
 |
|
A SKY SHIELD TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING?
The puzzle pieces fell into place with Deep Sky's revelation that ATC radars were being "degraded" by tanker-released particles showing up as a "haze" on their screens. This radar characteristic matched the high concentrations of aluminum powder found along with a preponderance of quartz particles in Espanola's chemtrail-contaminated rainwater.
The tankers' aluminum powder emissions also matched the Welsbach patent. Issued in 1994 to the Hughes aerospace giant "for Reduction of Global Warming", the sky shield blueprint calls for dispensing microscopic particles of aluminum oxide and other reflective materials into the upper atmosphere to reflect one or two per cent of incoming sunlight. Computer simulations by Ken Caldeira at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory calculated that this would be enough to stop warming over 85 per cent of the planet, despite an anticipated doubling of carbon in the atmosphere within the next 50 years.
Lawrence Livermore priced the aerial spray program at US$1 billion dollars a year--a cheap fix to maintain massive petroleum profits in the face of Kyoto's internationally agreed carbon cutbacks.
Livermore's founder, Edward Teller, lobbied hard for another chance to play with planetary processes. At the 1998 International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, the Father of the H-bomb presented his Next Big Idea. Having earlier pressed for detonating nuclear bombs to carve new harbours out of American coastlines, Teller now called for reflective chemicals to be spread like mirror-shades over the Earth. Or at least over allies who could agree in secret for this unprecedented geoengineering experiment to be carried out over their unsuspecting constituents.
In a draft report leaked to me soon after it appeared for peer review in May 2000, an expert panel chosen among 3,000 atmospheric scientists looked at Caldeira's computer simulations and agreed that Teller's scheme might work. But the IPCC warned against unpredictable upsets of the atmosphere, as well as against angry populaces reacting to "the associated whitening of the visual appearance of the sky".
Caldeira was so concerned he went public, warning that deflecting sunlight would further cool the stratosphere, concentrating icy clouds of ozone-gobbling CFCs that could destroy Earth's solar radiation shield.
Was the sky shield experiment already underway? Deep Sky hinted that it was.
Were the tankers involved in weather modification? Our FAA source hesitated before responding. "That approximates what I was told."
For the third interview we rephrased our key question. Were the tankers repeatedly observed on ATC radars involved in climate modification? I caught my breath as Deep Sky confirmed that this is what he was told was the object of the missions.
Here at last was our "smoking nuke" admission. After years of "airliner" double-speak, we could now corroborate Deep Sky's report of military aircraft dispensing reflective materials with an earlier report by a Canadian aviation official.
On December 8, 2000, Terry Stewart, the Manager for Planning and Environment at the Victoria International Airport, had broken this story wide open when he responded to a caller's complaint the previous day of Xs, circles and grids being woven over the British Columbia capitol. Leaving a message on an answering machine tape, later heard by more than 15 million radio listeners, the public servant explained: "It's a military exercise, US and Canadian Air Force exercise that's going on. They wouldn't give me any specifics on it."
Stewart added that he found the incident--one of hundreds reported over Canada's west coast since the fall of 1998--"very odd".
Tasked with defending Canadian airspace in the region, CFB Comox chose instead to defend a classified collaboration. "No military operation is taking place," the base information officer tersely told me when I called for details. But Stewart later told the Vancouver Courier that his information had come directly from CFB Comox. http://www.nexusmagazine.com/chemtrails.html
|
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 12:01 am
|
|
|
Intriguing to say the least!!!
Nice article.
Mech |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 12:53 am
|
|
|
LOL !
the only thing missing besides a certain name is "and chemtrails will be common knowledge by late summer"
sheesh
------------------
T/S |
| |
|
|
PacerLJ35
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 456
Location: Millbrook, AL, USA |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 3:54 am
|
|
|
ATC radars are working fine. There are procedures that pilots must use if ATC radars aren't working up to snuff, and I haven't had to use them to date. Not to mention that I've physically been to several approach control facilities, and have looked on their D-BRITEs...no problems.
How many of you have actually visited an ATC radar facility? |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:29 am
|
|
|
Pacer,
Ever consider that SOME radar signatures are being affected by this alleged phenomena, not just the ones that you have visited? A few radar stations don't really add up to much.
I have been to one at NAS Oceana and one on the USS Theodore Roosevelt
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 10-11-2002] |
| |
|
|
Deborah
Joined: 30 Jul 2000
Posts: 731
Location: East Coast |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:33 am
|
|
|
Excerpt from article posted by emfx13:
.....Caldeira was so concerned he went public, warning that deflecting sunlight would further cool the stratosphere, concentrating icy clouds of ozone-gobbling CFCs that could destroy Earth's solar radiation shield.....
I'm interested in this excerpt. Thanks for posting this. Back later. |
| |
|
|
Deborah
Joined: 30 Jul 2000
Posts: 731
Location: East Coast |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:47 am
|
|
|
.....Caldeira was so concerned he went public, warning that deflecting sunlight would further cool the stratosphere, concentrating icy clouds of ozone-gobbling CFCs that could destroy Earth's solar radiation shield.....
Caldiera's concern was completely justified.
22 September 2000
The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/22/science/22OZON.html
[NASA Documentation: 6 September 2000]
http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/earth/environ/ozone/ozone.htm
It's that time of year again. As the Antarctic darkness fades and southern spring begins, the ozone layer disappears completely. This year it seems to be the worst ever. Several years ago, scientists expected to see improvments in the hole as the cut in the use of CFC's began to take effect. Now we know that global warming will also damage the ozone layer. This year's results seem to confirm that.
****************
The ozone hole forms only in spring because the reaction that breaks ozone molecules apart needs a certain amount of light and the presence of a substrate, polar stratospheric clouds [PSC's.] In winter, the clouds [tiny supercool ice droplets] form, but there is no light. In summer, warmer temperatures melt the clouds. Spring is the only season where both are present.
***Although global warming is heating the lower atmosphere, it is actually cooling the stratosphere. This allows more PSC's to form and act as a substrate for the ozone-destroying reactions.***
****************
In the past two weeks the twelve monitoring stations around the Antarctic have recorded ozone levels 50-70% lower than the pre-hole baseline. Some of the stations have recorded their lowest-ever records. The hole covers Antarctica completely and reaches as far as the town of Ushuaia, Argentina. This represents an area three times larger than the United States. END
News In Science
9 August 2002
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/enviro/EnviroRepublish_643595.htm
The Contrail Effect
Excerpt:
.....DR. ANDREW CARLETON: "Most researchers, however, believe that contrails will make global warming worse because they tend to spread out and become thin over time. It is these persisting contrails that have a climatic impact; not the transient ones that form and disappear within a few minutes.".....
Nature
8 August 2002
http://www.nature.com/nsu/020805/020805-7.html
Vapour trails' effects confirmed
Excerpt:
.....DR. ANDREW CARLETON: "But locally, contrails are equally as significant as greenhouse gases,".....
My point is this: WHATEVER is being emitted from aircraft, and however people choose to classify it, it's all EMISSIONS, most of which are occurring in the upper troposphere. If there are serious efforts underway to develop and implement "prediction technology" for real-time forecasting of these EMISSIONS, there must be a pretty good reason for those efforts.
.....DR. PATRICK MINNIS: "If scientists determine that contrails are negatively impacting climate change, we could minimize their formation by predicting where they will occur and then suggesting alternate flight altitudes accordingly, when feasible,".....
Very telling, in my opinion.
Excerpted from:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Langley Research Center
Hampton, Virginia 23681-2199
http://www.larc.nasa.gov/news_and_events/inside_pages/2002/02-035.html
For Release May 13, 2002
RELEASE NO. 02-035 NASA Scientists Use Empty Skies to Study Climate Change
WHATEVER is blowing around up there, we all SEE IT - and we're all SEEING the same thing. And it is my strong opinion that the cumulative effect of all this CRAP is not only exacerbating surface warming, but is cooling the stratosphere and facilitating the formation of the polar stratospheric clouds upon which the chemical interactions [involving chlorine and bromine] which DESTROY OZONE are taking place.
Re-read emfx13's submission above, do some research and see for yourselves. The damned FACTUAL INFORMATION is OUT THERE. The atmospheric science community is doing a good job trying to keep up with an overwhelming set of challenges. They're not just jagging around. CONNECT a little, for crying out loud.
Did it ever occur to anyone that the debunkers have a deliberate agenda to keep people from inquiring too closely into other areas besides chemtrails??? Like CONTRAILS and THEIR effects, maybe?? THINK about it. LOOK at our skies. Not looking too good, are they?
I'm done here.
By the way, I do feel that it's a very definite probability that some kind of upper-tropospheric aerosol geo-engineering program is well underway. That is my opinion - and it's not exactly based on nothing.
Signed,
Extremely Angry tonight, and justifiably so
P.S. My personal life is going well, thank you very much. |
| |
|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:03 pm
|
|
|
Very interesting deborah,thanx. "The damned FACTUAL INFORMATION is OUT THERE" |
| |
|
|
PacerLJ35
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 456
Location: Millbrook, AL, USA |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 8:59 pm
|
|
|
Mech:
When ATC loses radar capability, they are required to notify aircrews within their sector that the radar is down, and then the aircrews are required to use non-radar position reports. That, and ATC has to reroute air traffic to increase seperation between aircraft in non-radar environments.
Whether the radar is out, or just degraded to where they have trouble seeing traffic, doesn't matter. They switch to the same rules as a non-radar environment.
There's only been one instance where I've had to do this in the United States, and that was at Laughlin AFB, the local approach radar system was down for a radar upgrade.
I get the idea of what you're trying to imply, Mech...that maybe it was some other radar system and not the ones I was dealing with.
However, since I fly nationwide at least 1-2 times a week, and this "chemtrail" nonsense is supposed to be a nationally occuring operation, one would think that I would have run into this degraded radar environment at least once...but alas I have not. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:15 pm
|
|
|
Remember...I said alleged phenomena. Where I live (in a rural area of Massachusetts) it ("chem spraying") doesn't seem to be happening.
However, when I go to places like Boston and Hartford...the skys are mostly "whited out." Caused by either Contrails or chemtrails,take your pick, even though we have had next to no precip this summer and it's been extremely dry up untill recently. These certainly aren't weather related clouds. |
| |
|
|
rainheart
Joined: 03 Oct 2001
Posts: 175
|
|
Sun Oct 13, 2002 10:40 pm
|
|
|
Great work Deborah! thanks.
I think the pieces are coming together. |
| |
|
|
Deborah
Joined: 30 Jul 2000
Posts: 731
Location: East Coast |
|
Sun Oct 13, 2002 10:50 pm
|
|
|
emfx13, rainheart -
Thank you. Let's keep going..... |
| |
|
|
PacerLJ35
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 456
Location: Millbrook, AL, USA |
|
Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:42 am
|
|
|
Mech, I fly up that a-way all the time. Bedford, Otis, Westover, Hampton Beach (LI, NY), Bangor, Groton...
In fact, I'm flying to Groton/New London airport on Tuesday. Let's compare notes. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:58 am
|
|
|
I'll take a look on Tuesday, It's been raining here for the past 3 days so Tuesday should be a rain free day. I haven't checked the forecast though.My own observations should not constitute a professional opinion of the Chemtrail phenomena. I can only tell you what I see that day. If it's a lingering "whiteout" like I have seen on some days...I would suspect they are something other than contrails.
But I could be wrong, let's hope that I am.It's up to everyone else out there to draw your own conclusions based on what you know.
Truth to tell...I don't consider myself to be experienced on this subject. I am much more concerned about the political agenda of our nations leaders and lawmakers at this point. That's something a lot of people really need to pay close attention to as well.You need to know what these people are doing to your future.
I respect the legitimate concerns expressed here of what may be going on in our atmosphere. Make no mistake...I am just as concerned.
Mech
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 10-13-2002] |
| |
|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
|
Mon Oct 14, 2002 8:40 pm
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 5:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
