Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
Proof the Mass Media is Controlled ?

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Chemtrails

Author Thread
nodebbunker





Joined: 01 Nov 2000
Posts: 200
Location: Indiana USA
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 3:48 am  Reply with quote  

Oh, my. I may be geographically challenged and spelling challenged, but I sure would never take Christ out of Christmas with an X. Sorry I missed your reply in the other thread regarding your location. I just wanted a confirmation of your location for my research.

>"Not only do you switch answers and questions in midstream, you also take my response out of context. Talk about disinformation!'<

Yep, I'm good!

>"Are YOU really from Indiana?"<

No, I'm really from Chicago but have been in Indiana for 10 years. Just a stop-over while travelling the road of life.

>"You're only making my point about debunkers using tactics like, blind-siding, filibustering, side-stepping (changing subjects), etc. by these recent responses. "<

No actually, you're doing a good job of twisting. I changed my post because it sounded too smart-ass, however, you were on the board, saw it, posted your expletive deleted as I was in the edit mode changing it.

>"Even your name is disinformation. You should take off the 'no' in debunker, but that would defeat the purpose wouldn't it?"<

Actually, and this can be verified easily, my name is Deb. Because I stated a truth regarding contrails after a year's participation in another forum, I was labelled as a debunker and a sleeping operative as well as banned. Some people find it annoying when the truth doesn't fit their agenda. So, when I came over to this forum, I changed my moniker from Chickie Deb, to No-Deb-Bunker, just a housewife from Indiana, which I am except I work part-time in a pharmacy. I know several people who post here quite well. I can be found in the White pages on the net and have never hidden my true identity from anyone. And yes, spellcheck on this board would be a blessing, however, I do my best, say what I have to say and as long as the point gets acrossed, I don't care about spelling, punctuation or whatever.

>"Strangely enough, we probably do agree on more than you think. Maybe you're just a Kloset Klintonite?...upset with my postings in "Bush Wins"?"<

Unless I reply to you directly, using your moniker, defender, I probably didn't even read your post. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I would rather have your direct implication of 4 letter words as above then refer to me as a Kloset Klintonite. Why do you continue to provoke me with accusations such as this?

Actually defender, I was hoping you meant what you said and would let it go at that. . .

>"XXXX XXX! debunker You're not worth any more of my time. (...I'll try not to use such big words next time.)"<

Big words, all right. Please don't waste any more time on me.

edited for spelling.
------------------
just a housewife from Indiana

[Edited 1 times, lastly by nodebbunker on 11-30-2000]
 View user's profile Send private message
defender





Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 3:53 am  Reply with quote  

"uh... yeah, right. You are unreal.

At least you admitted to being a liar.

_________________________________________
>"Not only do you switch answers and questions in midstream, you also take my response out of context. Talk about disinformation!'<

Yep, I'm good!

___________________________________________

Your purpose, as a "debunker" is to disrupt real efforts to get to the truth in the case of chemtrails.

I just read your post in Bush Wins... if you're really a Skolnick fan, you can't be all bad. If you can face the facts and accept that so many conspiracy "theories" are really fact, how can you be so naive to the idea that chemtrails are a conspiracy (good or bad)?

Your last post is telling. I hope you don't delete it.

and, for the record...when you quoted me as saying that neither of us knows what a CHEMTRAIL is, you changed terminology AGAIN and said you're some kind of expert at identifying a CONTRAIL.



[Edited 6 times, lastly by defender on 04-30-2001]
 View user's profile Send private message
Thermit





Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 4:48 am  Reply with quote  

Man, that was a hard series of posts to follow!

There is always common ground no matter how diverse the ideas. Agreement in Ideals is more important than Ideas.

quote:

spellcheck on this board would be a blessing



Suggestion noted!
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
defender





Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 7:13 am  Reply with quote  

Thermit,

It's hard to follow because she removes statements she's made after seeing my responses that prove she is wrong!

I make a lot of mistakes at spelling so I edit alot. Force of habit I guess. One thing is for sure, I am spending way too much time here. Didn't realize I'd have to "defend" myelf so often.

I know you see whats happened here. The topic here is lost because debbunker wanted to make an attack here instead of taking it to the Debate/Debunking forum.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by defender on 12-01-2000]
 View user's profile Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 7:20 am  Reply with quote  

With all due respect defender, you edit the crap out of your posts, I mean please ! you edited a 3 liner 3 times....

If you can't spell join the club just proof read your posts I do and still miss stuff, nobody should pick on you for spelling...unless your mark sky and then that's different, he does not even try....

use your e-mail spell check,then cut and paste it here....

------------------
T/S
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
defender





Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 7:23 am  Reply with quote  

....

[Edited 1 times, lastly by defender on 04-30-2001]
 View user's profile Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 7:30 am  Reply with quote  

pot calling kettle black ? I just had to edit cause I mis-spelled "supreme"

LOL !!!!

------------------
T/S
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
LTC8K6





Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 267
Location: Tar Heel State
PostFri Dec 01, 2000 2:35 pm  Reply with quote  

When you edit a post, at the bottom, put "EDIT:" and then explain your edit, if it is that big of a deal.

EDIT: Removed smart aleck remarks.


[Edited 1 times, lastly by LTC8K6 on 12-01-2000]
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Norrin Radd





Joined: 04 Nov 2000
Posts: 90
PostSat Dec 02, 2000 1:59 am  Reply with quote  

Wow!

First of all, I'm in no contest with anyone. I just happened to be enough of a loser to have time to saerch the patent office for 60 plus hours and then finding numerous interesting patents. I sent them to Will Thomas, Veterans for Government Accountability, Art Bell and a few other places I can't remember. This was in March of 1999. I also searched a ton of NASA sites, but back then there was only one chemtrail site, which was Wm. Thomas site.

Does this make me great? No, it just proves I have no life, therefore giving me the time to do this monotonous research.

Anyways, I think some people here need to do a little research. Not on chemtrails, but on who really runs this country. I will supply the starting point in my next post.

Brent
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostSat Dec 02, 2000 9:35 am  Reply with quote  

Brent,

I certainly don't consider research ,and reading a waste of time or a person that does so a "loser"....

This comment:

>The patent I posted is at chemtrails.org and he credits me for finding it. I found this and many other patents in March of 1999. Unfortunatly Will Thomas was the only site dicussing chemtrails, not counting a few discussion forums.<

Seems brazen and thus my reply....I was invloved about a month before march 99'...although not in a pro-active state, I also remember chuck warren and 'strangehaze' had sites up. I seen strangehaze first and found contrail/connection after the board change....
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/messageboard/mbs.cgi?acct=mb540458&MyNum=93067032 8&P=Yes&TL=930633941

Griff psted there a 'larry wanye harris' deciple, harris has been traced back to the original "there spraying you" with pathogens and bio-logical weapons.....

Which was way before 2/99 when carnicom became a chemtrail activist.

------------------
T/S

[Edited 1 times, lastly by theseeker on 12-02-2000]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Norrin Radd





Joined: 04 Nov 2000
Posts: 90
PostSat Dec 02, 2000 8:43 pm  Reply with quote  

I stand corrected. It must have been Feburary, 1999, when I found the patents. I believe Strange Haze had just come on the scene, not sure if I sent patents to them or not.

Contrail Connection was not up yet, as I believe it started on March 21.

Anyways, I doubt anyone here cares, so I will stop this now.

I am so frustrated by many of the people I know, whom have heard me talk about chemtrails for over 18 months, yet they drive to work on heavy chem days, then drive home again, and guess what. They didn't even notice the chemtrails becuase they had too much on their minds. They were too busy to look up. Even on days where people are not working, many just forget to look up.

Makes me sick.

Brent

 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nodebbunker





Joined: 01 Nov 2000
Posts: 200
Location: Indiana USA
PostMon Dec 11, 2000 7:47 pm  Reply with quote  

Back to the topic of a controlled media, I was just reading the CNN site and this is the poll they are running -
QUICK VOTE
During the month-long Florida vote controversy:


I have not paid much attention to any other news stories but that one.
I have managed to keep up with other news, just as I always do.
View Results

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could this be a test to see if the grand illusion is diverting attention?

 View user's profile Send private message
Swedishoo





Joined: 09 Aug 2000
Posts: 429
Location: NC
PostTue Dec 12, 2000 11:31 pm  Reply with quote  

It's a Grand Illusion, alright.

Christy
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nodebbunker





Joined: 01 Nov 2000
Posts: 200
Location: Indiana USA
PostWed Dec 13, 2000 4:09 pm  Reply with quote  

All morning on NBC Today, Matt Lauer and crew have been expounding on the "divison" of our country. In closing, he called upon Tim Russert to confirm how divided in all aspects our country, in their opinion now stands.

Jesse Jackson got whammed by an excellent editorial from J.J. Johnson of the Sierra Times, also a black man. http://www.sightings.com/general6/jackson.htm

Edited for addition:
http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm
MEDIA SPIN

All morning long I have been listening to Charlie Gibson, Diane Sawyer, Katie Couric and the like talk about the "deep division" in the U.S. Supreme Court. There was virtually no discussion of the 7 to 2 decision that the manner of recounting votes in Florida established by the Florida Supreme Court were unconstitutional.

What was the big dissent? It wasn't that the recount was unconstitutional ... it was over the question of whether or not there was still time for the Florida Supreme Court to make a third attempt to get it right. The majority of the court concluded that the federal law set a deadline of midnight last night.

Division, division, division. That's the word. And when the media isn't using the "division" word it's using the "political" word, saying that the decision was political.

The media isn't going to get the precious Bush presidency that it wanted so badly. It's going to be a Republcian presidency, and this is a bitter pill for the media to swallow. So -- the game plan? Is it to discredit the Supreme Court and, thus, the Bush presidency?

Naw --- the media wouldn't do that, would they?

No surprise – Democrats won’t disclaim Jackson’s calls for an “explosion.” http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/default-20001213225018.htm


Are we walking on gilded splinters?

------------------
just a housewife from Indiana

[Edited 1 times, lastly by nodebbunker on 12-13-2000]
 View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  
1, 2, 3

All times are GMT.
The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 6:09 pm


  Display posts from previous:      



Conspiracy List | Arcade Webmaster | Escape Games


© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum