|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
 Tue Nov 12, 2002 7:12 am
|
 |
|
Investigative? Other than parroting a AF 'public affairs' officer, I see no investigation referenced in this blurb whatsoever.
In fact, the author didn't even see fit to attach his name to this, erm, in-depth investigation.
Not surprisingly, the entire site appears to be designed to insult the intelligence of the average grade schooler. Some other thought provoking articles from KKTV...
What is drought?
Why do leaves change color?
And don't forget the online poll; What's your favorite season?
I fear the reader my become mentally exhausted by the intellectual workout that KKTV provides it's audience with!
I've got a suggestion for their next little quiz:
How many years did the Pentagon lie to congress and the american people with regards to the covert spraying of US citizens with VX and Sarin?
First the Pentagon told Congressman Thompson (D-CA) that the spraying never happened. Then they change their story and tell him "not to worry, they only used simulants". Now they've changed their story, again, and admit that thousands were exposed to the real McCoy.
Given the facts, Canex, do you really believe that articles like this will do anything other than serve to confirm the worst suspiscions people harbor regarding the mainstream media's willingness to actually investigate the past, present and future of atmospheric modification?
Or that they will somehow restore the public's faith in our government's obvious obsession with institutionalized secrecy and shamless 'strategic deception'?
quote:
The Air Force says contrails are in no way harmful to us. However, they do say contrails affect the cloudiness of the atmosphere, so they're currently studying what type of impact that's making on the atmospheric temperature and climate.
Oh really? And since when does it fall within the Air Force's mission paramaters to study the environmental impact of a bunch of harmless condesation trails?
In a time of war, when they are gearing up for a full scale 'pre-emptive' invasion?
Putting on their tye-dies and renewing their Greenpeace memberships as well, I suppose?
One again, the facts:
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Chem11 on 11-12-2002] |
| |
|
|
Ellyn
Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 4458
|
|
Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:40 am
|
|
|
Here is a post from Chem Trail Tracking USA on the subject.
From: "timjodi2002" >
Date: Mon Nov 11, 2002 6:19 pm
Subject: Chemtrail Report On Local Television Station
On Wednesday Nov. 6th KKTV (a CBS affiliate) out of Colorado Springs,
Colorado had a special segment entitled "Colorado Investigates" in which they reported on Chemtrails. The segment was about five minutes long and very interesting. The report was done by Beth Bason of KKTV.
They did show several photos of chemtrails during the report. She did not give out any specific chemtrail websites; however, she did state that all one needs to do is type in the word "chemtrails" on the search engine to find out more information. She reported that she repeatedly contacted Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs for an interview and they refused. She then tried NORAD and the Air Force Space Command, but they too refused any interview. She then contacted Buckly Air Force Base in Denver and they agreed to an interview, only to cancel last minute. When she asked them if she could reschedule, she was told that any further contact would have to be cleared through Washington. She then contacted the Pentagon. She spoke with an Air Force Public Affairs Specialist who told her that this notion (of chemtrails) is "ridiculous." However, this should be of no great surprise.
We contacted Beth Bason of KKTV via email, and she reported back that
there was an overwhelming response and she has received more
information and more contacts concerning chemtrails. She then stated
that she does plan on a follow-up segment in the future: We'll see.
However, I was surprised to see an investigative report on this
subject. Furthermore, I must ask why Peterson AFB etc. refused an
interview if there is nothing to this. What are they hiding? Seems
a bit incriminating to me.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Ellyn on 11-12-2002] |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 6:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
