|
|
PAK
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1324
|
 Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:03 pm
|
 |
|
Fool
quote:
Those persistent contrails look quite hight to me...and the fact that you cannot hear the planes suggests that they are very far away.
try again.
http://thefutureofthings.com/news/5798/mit-and-nasa-designing-silent-aircraft.html
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics recently won a contract from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to design quieter, more energy efficient, and more environmentally friendly commercial airplanes. The two million dollar contract from NASA is just an initial step in bringing green technologies to the sky, but it is an important step toward bringing current trends in engineering and product design to the airline industry.
As if NASA is worried about commercial airplane noise. Obviously, the military already has this technology and is using it since they are now introducing it to us ci-vilians.
try again.
_________________
... we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. Aldous Huxley |
| |
|
|
Foolsbane
tagged & banned
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 174
|
|
Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:21 pm
|
|
|
...except that-
A) They are scientists from MIT and thus bought and paid for (according to you) by the Illuminati- the UN or whatever....and thus why would you believe a word they say...
B) the article specifically states that they are ATTEMPTING to design silent aircraft and hope to do so by 2030....
C) Which leads to the logical premise that if the "military" already had it...why would NASA be giving money to MIT to try and develop it?
Please stop with your illogical assumptions designed to obfuscate and torture data until it confesses...
the fact of the matter is YOU DO NOT know what the altitude is of the trails you saw...
Moreover, your refusal to acknowledge that commercial planes leave persistent, spreading contrails- which is undeniable FACT- leaves your assumptions and opinions about what you see in the sky extremely dubious.
Connect all the dots you want...it still ends up a Rorschach test where you see what you want to see.
Good luck with that. |
| |
|
|
PAK
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1324
|
|
Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:45 pm
|
|
|
I got something stuck in my throat. Cough cough
_________________
... we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. Aldous Huxley |
| |
|
|
Cloudy Skies
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 122
Location: UK |
|
Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:07 pm
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Foolsbane
quote:
Countless people have now documented and photographed low level cirrus clouds that obviously cannot be made of ice crystals
Countless?? I have yet to see one.
Me neither. I would think phenomena like this would be well known amongst the hundreds of thousands of amateur weather enthusiasts around the world - who surely have no reason whatsoever to toe the secret Govt line? Any new or very unusual cloud formation would be on the internet in a flash.
Or maybe it is? What do you call "cirrus" that forms at lower altitude and comprises water vapour instead of ice crystals? Altostratus or altocumulus perhaps? 
PAK: maybe the idea of quieter aircraft is to make life better for folk living close to airports and under take-off/landing flight paths?
I personally find it no surprise at all that an airliner flying 6 miles overhead is a) hard to see b) cannot be heard and c) may at times leave a persistent contrail.
Why do you find it so surprising? |
| |
|
|
PAK
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1324
|
|
Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:34 pm
|
|
|
quote:
PAK: maybe the idea of quieter aircraft is to make life better for folk living close to airports and under take-off/landing flight paths?
Obviously the commercial jets here locally don't have these nice silencers on them, nor do the UPS jets that fly in and out on a regular schedule and are extremely loud, nor do these local planes leave any lingering trails behind them. I've never seen the UPS jets fly straight up, or straight down, in a slow manner, leaving thick plumes behind them, nor have I seen them fly back and forth, slowly, leaving thick plumes as our airport is not busy enough for them to be put in a holding pattern and they have their own take off and landing areas. Amazing that the local air traffic jets fly in and out very quickly, you see them and then they are gone, no trails. But, these other unmarked planes, fly back and forth very slowly, they don't appear to be going anywhere nor do they have to be somewhere in a hurry or on a schedule, nor do they ever land here.
_________________
... we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. Aldous Huxley |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 6:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
