Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
AMERICA--OUR PRISON CARS AWAIT US!!!!!!

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > New World Order

Author Thread
Ellyn





Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 5289
AMERICA--OUR PRISON CARS AWAIT US!!!!!! PostTue Jul 28, 2009 6:59 am  Reply with quote  

AMERICA-- OUR PRISON CARS AWAIT US !!!!!!!

ORIGINAL CAPTION: Your fiat money at work building these bi-level prison cars (by the thousands according to the San Francisco Chronicle) built by KBR (Kellogg, Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton). These were parked on the tracks behind a pecan orchard managed by one of my friends in Texas a few months back. They were completely hidden from the highway that paralleled the orchard.The Fetid Feds only moved them at night. It has been reported that some of these beauties have been prepositioned in each state.

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/new_world_order/news.php?q=1248568763
 View user's profile Send private message
Markus





Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 53
PostWed Jul 29, 2009 2:06 pm  Reply with quote  

Hi Ellyn,

I came across this explanation the other day:

http://www.rense.com/general86/pris.htm

I appreciate all the interesting and informative articles that you share with this forum.

Cheers,

Markus
 View user's profile Send private message
Ellyn





Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 5289
PostWed Jul 29, 2009 3:58 pm  Reply with quote  

Thanks for checking this out, Markus.
 View user's profile Send private message
WECWATURDOIN





Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 186
PostThu Jul 30, 2009 11:29 pm  Reply with quote  

Circulating groundless hysteria without any basis of proof causes other website to become rubbish.

I hope this does not happen to Chemtrail Central.

I have been a member for a long time and have always found the information on this site, until recently, to be based with facts and evidence.
 View user's profile Send private message
Ellyn





Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 5289
SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE ARTICLE:RULE BY FEAR OR RULE BY LAW? PostFri Jul 31, 2009 7:25 am  Reply with quote  

Paragraph from article on prison railroad cars:

Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL

Rule by fear or rule by law?
Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg

Monday, February 4, 2008

"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."

- Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943

Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs."

Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.

According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists."

Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars should not go to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house perhaps millions of people?

Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive the power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order."

The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite imprisonment of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens alike.

Also in 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity of government" in the event of what the document vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency." Should the president determine that such an emergency has occurred, he and he alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure "continuity of government." This could include everything from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on NSPD-51.

U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County) has come up with a new way to expand the domestic "war on terror." Her Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (HR1955), which passed the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a commission to "examine and report upon the facts and causes" of so-called violent radicalism and extremist ideology, then make legislative recommendations on combatting it.

According to commentary in the Baltimore Sun, Rep. Harman and her colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the country faces a native brand of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping investigative power to combat it.

A clue as to where Harman's commission might be aiming is the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who "engage in sit-ins, civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of animal rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be anti-abortion protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists, environmentalists, peace demonstrators, Second Amendment rights supporters ... the list goes on and on. According to author Naomi Wolf, the National Counterterrorism Center holds the names of roughly 775,000 "terror suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000 per month.

What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens?

The Constitution does not allow the executive to have unchecked power under any circumstances. The people must not allow the president to use the war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law.

Lewis Seiler is the president of Voice of the Environment, Inc. Dan Hamburg, a former congressman, is executive director.

This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL#ixzz0MoqrnsD5
 View user's profile Send private message
WECWATURDOIN





Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 186
PostFri Jul 31, 2009 3:48 pm  Reply with quote  

Hr 1955 was 2007 legislation that never passed.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1955

This bill never became law. This bill was proposed in a previous session of Congress. Sessions of Congress last two years, and at the end of each session all proposed bills and resolutions that haven't passed are cleared from the books. Members often reintroduce bills that did not come up for debate under a new number in the next session.

Here are the newest bills searching "home grown terrorism". Dont see anything so far that would raise eyebrows, did not read all of them but maybe you would like to read the actual proposed legislation other than peoples opinions on other websites.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billsearch.xpd?PostFormID=billsearch&session=111&q=homegrown+terrorism&sponsor=&cosponsor=&chamber=&status=&sort=


http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-3930


Military Commissions Act of 2006 on link above, show me where it states what you claim, can not seem to find what your claiming.


nspd51 link below

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-51.htm

"The people must not allow the president to use the war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law."

We must not allow the people to promote fear instead of truths for many are ignorant of the truth and will believe what ever they hear.

Obama becoming president is proof of the ignorance in this country.

Personally I would not believe anything that came out of California, they are bankrupt because of their ignorant policies and are paying with worthless IOU's that banks wont even honor.

Quoting and believing the San Francisco chronicle is like reading and believing what is in the Iran daily. LOL


fear mongering is like terrorism it is insidious.
 View user's profile Send private message
Ellyn





Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 5289
PostSat Aug 01, 2009 3:45 am  Reply with quote  

The San Francisco Chronicle article stated regarding The Military commissions Act of 2006:

The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite imprisonment of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens alike.

Here are two interesting videos which address this in so many words:

Rep. Kucinich - I have read this bill
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxLjirbJjmQ&feature=channel

and

Keith Olbermann - Military Commission Act 2006
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEwKSQm8Z6o


Last edited by Ellyn on Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:34 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message
mr. jones





Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 1899
PostSun Aug 02, 2009 7:43 pm  Reply with quote  

when the vaccines become mandatory...

thiose who refuse will be quarrantined in FEMA camps....

the railcars ar for them....
_________________
"The whole aim of practical politics is
to keep the populace alarmed, and thus clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of
hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SALFORD66





Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 231
PostTue Aug 04, 2009 6:25 am  Reply with quote  

They say South America will be less stringent....maybe we'll all end up there, I'm NOT having one.
 View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:46 am


  Display posts from previous:      




© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum, All Your Base