|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
slams from the past
 Wed Dec 13, 2000 7:30 am
|
 |
|
>>>>>Classic mark sky....
The Seekers recent questions
Sunday, 30-Jan-00 14:18:54
204.241.118.39 writes:
Are similar to those of Jay Reynolds last spring and summer. Simply put they have been asking us "what do you accept as 'normal' and what convinces you otherwise"
I have noticed that most people seem to accept a disapating chemtrail even if the plane flys slowly,lowly, and way away from a commercial air corridor.It may even fly in a circle,have no markings,and leave a trail 3 or 4 times its wingspan,...as long as the trail dissipates, it is considered normal.
I sence The Seeker is asking us,what can they get away with, and what needs more attention to make it more acceptable.
I used to answer these types of questions, then later noted a change in spray techniques.
That is why I no longer answer these types of questions
mark sky
_______________________
Well mark it's been 10 months any change in spray technics since ?
------------------
T/S<<<<<
Your "memorie" is "scarie baby"
tell me you are naughtaNSAcrasy
well honey child i am hear now
to listen to your instant sanity
have they changed the spray patterns
did they do it all for you
R listenig pleasure
shall i bid you adu
but i just came here you know
and found you a floundering
in denighal and flailing against
those naught here to defend
against crooked threads
battered with starlinked mush
and deep fried against
truth at all costs
even your soul
which calls out to a seeking meaning
chemtrailed pipelined and new world odered
pathogenosis re vieled
as olde pathways traveled assundered mileuped
you mat take what i say and turnip it unto
a heap of 10 month olde smolder
fore you are a prince
a real jewal of light
god if i was lost
i would seek out your light
for you are uncertain
if you have ever seen a CHEMTRAIL
while we the unenlightened
continue to ASSaile
tweep tweep
tah tah dah
blah blah
daylie you respond to
concerns of thy masters
platitudeinouse blastformationouse
wastelands of disinformation
|
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Wed Dec 13, 2000 8:29 am
|
|
|
What's bad is I understand that....
I think you should atleast give me this mark, I have always maintained that if the evidence would show that something is conclusively amiss I would gladly rejoin the effort....
Poetic injustice :
You said some nasty stuff in the final daze
some of which I am amazed
wondering still about some things
still you think someone pulls my strings
you say I am always here, and whyfor to you is not clear....
my intentions are true, although not to you
allbeit for the sip of a beer....
T/S
|
| |
|
|
nodebbunker
Joined: 01 Nov 2000
Posts: 200
Location: Indiana USA |
|
Wed Dec 13, 2000 3:09 pm
|
|
|
Mark, why don't you set a block of time each day and use Flight Explorer, for a dedicated amount of time? At least you would be able to distiguish what is and what isn't. You can copy FE screens into a Word file, coordinated with copies of the ADDS weather screens, satellite shots, AND take photos simultaneously identifying the "what isn't." You just have to be set up and be ready to go when the strangeness appears in your sky. It takes some effort and persistence, but since you feel so strongly about this issue, I don't understand why you won't give it a try?
------------------
just a housewife from Indiana |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Wed Dec 13, 2000 7:50 pm
|
|
|
I want to apologise to Thermit for reopening something that was closed last night and then falling asleep before i answered the question dredged up by theseeker from a year ago. I guess i was just taken aback that as i cruse this message board, i keep tripping over references to me or questions to me when i was not even here to answer them. I was registared but i had not even been reading this board let alone posting on it. Struck me as very strange.
Anyway the question that was raised I think is a worthy one to discuss, "Have the spray tactics changed due to people discussing them on message boards".
I have noticed a few little changes in spray tactics, as follows.
[1] Jets here on the oregon coast stay a little bit farther off shore than they used to.
[2] there seems to be a bit more effort to make emmisions "look normal" by this I mean two things, one is the attempt to have "a normal disapating type trail"
and the other is by utilizing the "off-on-off" type trail that is less obvious than the full on streak.
of course the picture below {if it pastes} shows that they still make some blatent patterns around here if they need to get the job done.
[image]http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/543-img.gif[/image]
nodebunker[can i call you chickie deb?]you are correct that if i want to convince you or someone else i must get and use FE, and it is on my list of things to do. Now the FAA in Portland Oregon and the USAF in Klamath Falls OR continue to tell me that these are niether commercial flights nor USAF flights. I suppose they could be Navy? |
| |
|
|
LTC8K6
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 267
Location: Tar Heel State |
|
Wed Dec 13, 2000 8:38 pm
|
|
|
Nice shot of contrails with mare's tails much higher above. |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
|
Wed Dec 13, 2000 9:00 pm
|
|
|
No apology needed. (P.S.: use img instead of image)
FAA filters out all the most "interesting" (military) flights on Flight Explorer Personal Edition.
I will mention that when I first became aware of the very persistent trails, they ran from horizon to horizon, very easy to notice even after an hour of drifting in the wind since they were so long, you could discern their origin. Now, I don't see that anymore. I only see "strips" or "matchstick" types of very persistent trails. These smaller trails are not as easily differentiated from non man-made clouds once they have drifted for a while. Sometimes they are longer "strips", but I don't think I've seen a horizon-to-horizon trail in months.
Why are the ends so sharp?
Doesn't the air mix?
This looks natural????
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 12-13-2000] |
| |
|
|
LTC8K6
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 267
Location: Tar Heel State |
|
Thu Dec 14, 2000 3:11 pm
|
|
|
Perfectly normal to me. Ends only seem sharp due to your distance. Up close they are not sharp at all.
If the air doesn't mix, then they are wasting an awful lot of bio-spray.
If this is their bio-spray, then it isn't working because it is staying right where it was sprayed. This would probably not even land in the U.S.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by LTC8K6 on 12-14-2000] |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
|
Thu Dec 14, 2000 4:37 pm
|
|
|
While these highly persistent trails give the appearance of "staying up there", they are continuously raining down particulates, as can be seen in this photo. |
| |
|
|
LTC8K6
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 267
Location: Tar Heel State |
|
Thu Dec 14, 2000 5:05 pm
|
|
|
I see some mare's tails and an ordinary contrail spreading out horizontally. I don't see any particles raining down.
Even if I accept your particles raining down, they are ice and will not make it anywhere near the ground. But I don't accept them. |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Fri Dec 15, 2000 9:54 pm
|
|
|
Here on the West Coast following a spraying we often get this ground level "smoke-haze", even after a rain.{see below}
If you really don't think that anything is falling down, by all means DO NOT spend 25$ on a floresent Black Light and a new plastic wrapped black tee-shirt!
then you wil not have the shock of dicovering all the tiny glowing fibers that fall from the sky.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by mark sky on 12-15-2000] |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Fri Dec 15, 2000 9:56 pm
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Fri Dec 15, 2000 10:01 pm
|
|
|
This page shows the progreesive spreading of chemtrails over Northern California, you don;t think this stuff ever fell to the ground do you?
http://www.contrailconnection.com/Photosrec16.htm |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
|
Fri Dec 15, 2000 10:04 pm
|
|
|
You can click on this satelitte photo to watch a 5 hour progression of Northern California beeing sprayed.
coast of oregon
Registered: Oct 2000
posted 12-15-2000 03:01 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This page has the "click to view a 5 hour series" of the progressive spreading of chemtrails over Northern California, you don't think this stuff ever fell to the ground do you? http://www.contrailconnection.com/Photosrec15.htm
[Edited 1 times, lastly by mark sky on 12-15-2000] |
| |
|
|
elvis lives
Joined: 30 Sep 2000
Posts: 143
Location: Pismo Beach, California |
|
Sat Dec 16, 2000 12:14 am
|
|
|
Mark Sky....I have read your 'spraying' posts now for several months. The only thing missing is your theory. Just what exactly are they spraying on us? Please don't beat around the bush with your answer. What are they spraying on us and why? Thanks |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 9:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
