|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
 Wed Dec 27, 2000 10:01 pm
|
 |
|
I think that is a good idea, although I'm not sure what time that would be local time. If one of you guys can send me such an image, I can do another overlay... |
| |
|
|
M. Magoo
Joined: 16 Nov 2000
Posts: 14
|
|
Wed Dec 27, 2000 10:32 pm
|
|
|
>>Come on CANEX and Rooster...we're waiting!<<
Canex. Wasn't he that formerly evil black ops Agent you helped get banned in another of your lusty Carnikom Witch Burnings? And now he won't jump here at your imperious beck and call?? There's a real mystery.
>>What happened Rooster...did your Flight Explorer break down?<<
At least we know he can get it up in the first place.
Which is more than you've ever demonstrated.
I ask the same as Nodeb: There have been scores and scores of similarly
interesting "hEY! gREat Find!" satellite pics published over time by others at Carnicom with the same intent of claiming
a chemtrail spray program. What made this one of yours so much more superior and interesting than all the past ones by other Carnicom posters that you are massaging it so much just now??
>>And Elvis...what a piece of work...raving about killing people. <<
That reminds me. Isn't your eagerly anticipated CDC Flu Data spamfest a bit overdue?
NOBODY-- lemmesayitagain-- NOBODY has ranted more on the net about "killing" vis a vis a covert coverup of government chemtrail killing crimes than you. Nice try twisting and distorting.
|
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Thu Jan 04, 2001 9:19 am
|
|
|
bump |
| |
|
|
Sore Throat
Joined: 01 Sep 2000
Posts: 1802
Location: x |
|
Fri Jan 05, 2001 1:56 am
|
|
|
1999-2000 flu season summary.
33 out of 35 weeks above epidemic threshold levels for death from respiratory distress.
This is CDC's own data MR.MAGOO.
Their other data were that of over 90,000 samples submitted by sentinel physicians from across the country, only 15% tested positive for influenza.
So just what was it that was causing these deaths?
And CDC's response?? Raise the levels of deaths necessary to be considered epidemic. (And while you're at it, doctor the data from previous years).
And Mr. Magoo still has no legitimate response for why the the trails on this day were only the NW-SE, and not those from the heavier used air corridors in California.
At least you're using an appropriate handle Magoo.
Just when was the last time you got your glasses checked?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Sore Throat on 01-04-2001] |
| |
|
|
LTC8K6
Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 267
Location: Tar Heel State |
|
Fri Jan 05, 2001 1:33 pm
|
|
|
S.T., I still don't see how those graphs could have been made to include the adjusted data other than by also adjusting the earlier figures. You have to alter all of the data on the chart, then make a note of it, for the chart to make sense don't you? How could you compare chart data across years otherwise? The only other way to go would be to have a chart for before the adjustment, and another chart for after. Even then, you would still have to do a calculation to compare data from the different charts. By altering the earlier data, you can just use one chart directly, the calculation is built in by altering the earlier data by the same amount as the new data.
If they were being sneaky, why did they tell us about the change? |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 9:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
