|
|
Jeanie
Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
 Sun Mar 02, 2003 11:52 pm
|
 |
|
CHEMTRAILS OUTLAW
The government says they don’t exist, but Kucinich wants Congress to take action
COMMENTARY
By Bob Fitrakis
January 24, 2002
The debate surrounding the federal government’s alleged weather modification experiments has landed in the U.S. Capitol, thanks to Cleveland Democrat Dennis Kucinich. Representative Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2001 on October 2 last year, seeking a “permanent ban on [the] basing of weapons in space.”
The bill, HR 2977, specifically outlaws a variety of weapons detailed in the December 6, 2001, Columbus Alive article “Stormy Weather,” which exposed allegations of secret government aerial spraying activities. Kucinich’s bill explicitly outlaws “chemtrails.”
Alive asked Kucinich why he would introduce a bill banning so-called chemtrails when the U.S. government routinely denies such things exist and the U.S. Air Force has routinely called chemtrail sightings “a hoax.”
“The truth is there’s an entire program in the Department of Defense, ‘Vision for 2020,’ that’s developing these weapons,” Kucinich responded. Kucinich says he plans to reintroduce a broader version of the bill later this month. “Plasma, electromagnetics, sonic or ultrasonic weapons [and] laser weapons systems” were among those banned by HR 2977.
Two scientists working at Wright Patterson Air Force Base informed Alive of the ongoing secret experiments, one involving weather modification and the other involving the creation of an aerial antenna using a barium stearate chemical trail. The scientists referred to the work of legendary inventor Nikola Tesla. Before Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars”), there was Tesla’s vision of high-tech space-based warfare and weather modification.
According to Tesla biographer Margaret Cheney, federal agents seized Tesla’s papers after his death in 1943. “[At] least one set of Tesla’s papers had reached Wright Field [now Wright Patterson Air Force Base],” Cheney wrote. The Aeronautic Systems Division at Wright Patterson admitted it had the Tesla papers but claim they were “destroyed.”
However, Tesla’s dream is embodied in a glossy brochure titled “Vision for 2020” released by the U.S. Space Command in 1998. The brochure states, “The emerging synergy of space superiority with land, sea and air superiority will lead to Full Spectrum Dominance.”
The Space Command spells out its purpose pretty plainly: “Dominating the space dimension of military operations to protect U.S. interests and investment.”
There’s nothing new here, for those who have been paying attention. In the 1970s, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, bluntly stated in his book Between Two Ages, “Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need to be appraised… [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”
On January 4 this year, Canadian Professor Michel Chossudovsky, of the Center for Research on Globalization at the University of Ottawa, issued a report noting that weapons have the ability to trigger climate changes. “Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the world’s climate. In the U.S., the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI),” Chossudovsky wrote. “Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction.”
Doubters of the military’s secret plans should refer to George and Meredith Friedman’s The Future of War, Power, Technology and American World Dominance in the 21st Century. The Friedmans, government-touted “arms experts” and favorites of the military-industrial complex, assert that “The American experience of power will rest on the domination of space.”
The U.S. Air Force giddily embraced the Friedmans’ thesis in the 1996 report “New World Vistas: Air And Space Power For The 21st Century.” The Air Force report notes, “In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict.”
State University of New York Professor of Journalism Karl Grossman, writing in 1999, revealed how the mainstream corporate press virtually ignores the government’s pronouncements while trade journals like Space News, Defense News, Aviation Week, Space Technology and Electronic Engineering Times routinely report on the military-industrial complex’s high-tech breakthroughs.
As for chemtrail skeptics, they might want to consult Rutgers University Political Science Professor Leonard Cole’s book Clouds of Secrecy: The Army’s Germ Warfare Test Over Populated Areas. Chemtrail deniers are apparently happy with the thought that their beloved paternalistic government would engage in aerial spraying over densely populated areas.
U.S. Representative Marty Sabo, a Democrat from Minnesota, denounced “the secret Army program to spray Minneapolis and other cities with chemicals in the 1950s and ’60s,” the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported in September 1994. “The idea that the government would use its own citizens as guinea pigs is appalling, and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms,” Sabo told a House subcommittee investigating the secret spraying, which used fluorescent tracers to mark wind patterns.
As for the Army, it argues that the secret Cold War-era spraying was not “human experimentation” since it didn’t target any specific individuals and the zinc cadmium sulfide used was harmless. But the International Agency for Research on Cancer lists all cadmium compounds as known cancer-causing agents.
Former students of Clinton Elementary in south Minneapolis told an investigating panel from the National Research Council that the Army’s secret chemical spraying adversely affected their health, according to the Star Tribune.
Skeptics who continue to insist the government would never be involved in secret aerial spraying, particularly in Ohio, may want to address their questions to the C-130 aircrews from the 910th Airlift Wing stationed at Youngstown’s Air Reserve Station. In July 2000, an Air Force press release bragged, “Fifteen service members from military installations in Germany and England were at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, 8-12 May, learning how to use chemicals to destroy the enemy… The seven airmen and eight soldiers learned how to plan, execute and oversee the entire process of applying pesticides by air.” The press release said the Youngstown air unit will only be used against “insects with their deadly diseases.”
Apparently insects take many forms. During the Seattle demonstrations against the World Trade Organization in November 1999, CNN reported that a military air unit with pathogen capacity to induce sickness in humans was deployed against the demonstrators.
Originating web page
|
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:00 am
|
|
|
May I ask where you got that little "report" at? |
| |
|
|
Feelin Kocky
Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Location: Underground Weather Control Bunker |
|
Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:07 am
|
|
|
>>High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI),” Chossudovsky wrote. “Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction.” <<
This statement is completely true. Except the part about how HAARP can trigger floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes or that it is a WMD. Other than that, quite true. 
F.K. |
| |
|
|
skyhawk
Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 13
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA USA |
|
Tue Mar 04, 2003 7:09 am
|
|
|
Jeannie, thanks for the article and link. But just for fun, let's debunk anything posted and discredit all sources. Instead of responding intelligently to facts presented, let's change the subject and shift focus. In this way we can obscure the truth and confuse the general populace into confusion, indecision and inaction.
------------------
The Hawk is watching. |
| |
|
|
CPaul
Joined: 23 Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Location: evergreen, al, usa |
|
Wed Mar 05, 2003 6:02 am
|
|
|
O-o-o-k...I've been quietly observing the skies here in So. Alabama ever since I stumbled upon this site about a month ago...and ur right. We're being "dumped" on big-time down here.
Alabama normally has beautiful blue skies...now whenever we have a clear day the jets come and fill-in every speck of blue. Sun? whazat??
I wrote Sen's Shelby and Sessions...received
auto-replies...nothing further.
So, where do I go from here?? |
| |
|
|
skyhawk
Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 13
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA USA |
|
Thu Mar 06, 2003 8:56 am
|
|
|
PHX-I meant to comment on this earlier in the week:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PHXPilot:
[B]No offense Skyhawk, but typing in "Pilots against Chemtrails" will produce horrifically erratic results. Seaching for one word will most certainly produce more hits than a three word string.
Example: "Santa". # of hits on google: 17,100,000 (!)
"Humans Against Santa": # of Hits: 117,000
From this we can conclude that some humans DO IN FACT recognize santa as something unprecedented, and that "something is going on".
That was good. I got a good laugh out of it. Muy hilarioso. Keep em coming.
|
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Fri Mar 07, 2003 12:03 am
|
|
|
Well, I dont know if you were being sarcsatic or not, but beyond that, I hope you understand what I mean when I say that using google as a survey tool is a very bad idea.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by PHXPilot on 03-06-2003] |
| |
|
|
skyhawk
Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 13
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA USA |
|
Fri Mar 07, 2003 7:15 am
|
|
|
PHX-No, I really found your comment funny, in a good way. I don't take this or myself THAT seriously. As to your point, I agree. Using google as some sort of "proof" that something is going on IS a bad idea. But using google as a tool to get an idea of the scope of the phenomenon, real or not, works for me. Another piece of the puzzle to consider. In and among all those hits is some good information. The problem is to wade through it. A daunting task, no doubt.
------------------
The Hawk is watching. |
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:35 pm
|
|
|
In and among all those hits is some good information
You are correct there, and I have waded through much of it. But, again, typing in "pilots against chemtrails" will bring up hits for webpages with the words "Pilots", "against", and "chemtrails". But not in any certain order. So, in the way of finding info, its a good idea, in the way of finding out how many people believe in chemtrails, its a bad idea.  |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3, 4
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 9:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
