|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
 Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:00 am
|
 |
|
Nobody has denied the government sprays bugs.
Look at the picture of the (I think) C-130 spraying chemicals, does that look anything like what you normally identify with chemtrails? What is normally attributive to chemtrails on this site are large extreme altitude white trails, it seems. That aircraft is flying very low and spraying a small stream of chemicals.
I'm sure if you got in the direct path of the chemicals and breathed in, it would not be very healthy at all for you- insectisides are poison, so steer clear if you can! I can imagine being sick if you are in direct contact with the trails listed in this thread because of that.
I am still a bit skeptical about chemtrails making people sick though, how can you be near them? They are 30 thousand feet up 
[Edited 1 times, lastly by ChemCaptain on 04-25-2003] |
| |
|
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 190
Location: Canberra Australia |
|
Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:10 am
|
|
|
Yeh you wouldnt be near it at 30000ft ;0)
i mean like under the chemtrail so you dont get rained on with chemicals.
here is one of the C-130 in full spray mode http://home.earthlink.net/~byronsworld/C130Formation.jpg
|
| |
|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
|
Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:19 am
|
|
|
Hey, theres no doubt if you got rained on by those pestisides it wouldn't be too healthy for you! They don't often spray heavy residential areas I'm sure, mostly farms/etc. I remember back a bunch of years ago there was a horrible gypsy moth outbreak around here, they posted warnings that sprayings were going to be happening and expained information about what they will be doing/do not come in contact/etc.
Trust me- If you have gypsy moth infestations, you'll welcome all the chemicals they can drop.
That C130 pic is interesting? Do you know what its spraying? It looks almost like a fire or something but I can't tell if that is smoke or clouds below it. Still looks cool.
|
| |
|
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 190
Location: Canberra Australia |
|
Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:25 am
|
|
|
yeh that pic is cool.
i have no idea what it is spraying.
|
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:19 pm
|
|
|
A concerned reader of CC recently E-mailed me with the reason for the trails the C-130 was producing.
Here is the E-mail:
The C-130 pic has been abused for years by chemmies as "proof" of spraying. You'll find an explanation at my site in the photo gallery.
The trails are from smoke generators using corvus or canopus oil, regular airshow smoke.
The study is here:
http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/PDF/1997/tp/NASA-97-tp3671.pdf |
| |
|
|
Jeanie
Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 1:41 am
|
|
|
One would have to be half witted, retarded, in denial, or dead not to know what's going on...... |
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:06 am
|
|
|
We'll, Im sure that we're all glad you decided to tell us that, Jeanie.
So, do you have a response to the study that I posted?
[Edited 2 times, lastly by PHXPilot on 04-25-2003] |
| |
|
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 190
Location: Canberra Australia |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:49 am
|
|
|
That C-130 photo wasent done at airshow.
those pilots are flying over open plain's at a high altitude
and would be flying much lower to give a better airshow effect.
The Photo originally came off a nasa website. |
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 3:39 am
|
|
|
I like how you read absolutely none of the study CONSPIRACY_MAN.
It was a study done by NASA to determine if the wake turbulance caused by aircraft intereferes with equipment. It didnt say it was at an airshow. It only said they used the same type of oil to create the smoke as they do at airshows. They used the smoke to outline where the wake vortex was located as it left the aircraft.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by PHXPilot on 04-25-2003] |
| |
|
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 190
Location: Canberra Australia |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 5:16 am
|
|
|
Also i dont have to read the study!
cuase i never said the picture had anything to do with chemtrails i just said it was a C-130 in full spray mode and diddnt know what it was spraying.
You are The One who Brought up The Study About it.
so what if the study is right
i never said it was wrong.
|
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 5:20 am
|
|
|
Also i dont have to read the study!
Im saying that if you would have read the study, you wouldnt have posted this:
That C-130 photo wasent done at airshow.
those pilots are flying over open plain's at a high altitude
and would be flying much lower to give a better airshow effect.
The Photo originally came off a nasa website.
|
| |
|
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 190
Location: Canberra Australia |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 5:23 am
|
|
|
yeh i most likly wouldnt of.
but i was to busy at the time
to read the study. |
| |
|
|
PHXPilot
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 5:37 am
|
|
|
Fair enough.
Anyway, I think we have finally figured out what is going on in that C-130 photo after all these years. |
| |
|
|
ChemCaptain
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States |
|
Sat Apr 26, 2003 5:43 am
|
|
|
Besides the fact PHX, Thats probably what it would look like if were spraying chemicals, not big billowing white trails.
I think that is a point I've seen you debunkers make 1000 times while being completely ignored. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 25, 2012 10:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
