|
|
julianpenrod
Joined: 07 Mar 2002
Posts: 303
Location: west caldwell, new jersey, united states |
strange plant growth
 Wed Jul 14, 2004 2:55 am
|
 |
|
Julian Penrod
4 Fairfield Avenue
West Caldwell, New Jersey 07006
(973) 220-1601
julianpenrod@comcast.net
July 13, 2004
To all:
Acknowledging something based on the facts, even though there are those who insist that it is patently impossible, is a seminal part of the opposition to chemtrails, and the evident overall project of which they seem a part.
I have pointed out that replacing or augmenting the water in the air, to control weather, seems part of the purpose for chemtrails. This year, just like the last three, we have had a vegetable garden, just off our back porch. The garden includes tomatoes, peppers and cucumbers. Since planting them, even before Memorial Day, we have been noticing that their growth has been strange. Most important is the fact that the tomatoes and cucumbers seem very slowed in their development. Cucumbers, for example, take abnormally long, even to get to minimal size. Several I have watched, for example, would be smaller than gherkin size for a week or more! One took two weeks to grow to only about 3 inches length, another took ten days to get to about 2 1/2 inches. It also seems that the vines are producing only a few cucumbers at a time. Tomatoes have been growing at, more or less, a normal pace, but they have not gotten red! Some are more than 2 pounds in weight, but are still green! Interestingly, the peppers, cubanelles, seem to be producing even more than last year, and faster.
We also planted a rose bush, to accompany one that we planted last year. Last year, the first rose bush produced buds all but constantly, with as many as 10 blossoms on the bush, at a time. When we purchased this rose bush, the man selling it made a point of saying that it only had three "growing cycles" a season, and that we shouldn't expect more blossoms than those. I have seen rose bushes that produced roses all season. This idea of "cycles" seemed patently abnormal to us, and had the appearance that the man felt we were unfamiliar with roses, and wanted to gloss over the fact that, for some reason, plants will be growing very sluggishly, this year!
I wondered what the reason could be for this slow growth of all the plants. To grow, plants require, primarily, sun, warmth, water and carbon dioxide. For the most part, all of those seemed to be available to the plants, except, perhaps, carbon dioxide! I have suggested, before, that the changing of gases in the air could affect the partial pressure of oxygen at the earth's surface, and I pointed out that such as fibromyaliga and chronic fatigue syndrome seem to have some similarity to oxygen starvation!
The growth of the plants, that we have seen, may indicate that carbon dioxide has been, somehow, largely removed from the atmosphere!
It should be mentioned, too, that a possible cause for the slow growth of the plants was the anomalously cool evenings we have been experiencing. Even now, near the heart of the summer, days can get up to 90 degrees, but the evenings can fall to the mid to upper 60's! Some nights, temperatures even seem to have fallen to the upper 50's! But this, too, can be significant. Because, apparently, the latent heat that remains in the atmosphere, at night, can, largely, be affected by the amount of carbon dioxide! A loss of carbon dioxide significant enough to affect the growth of plants can also prevent the atmosphere from holding onto heat.
Where an alien substance may be being introduced into the atmosphere to take the place of water in weather causation, it may be either reducing the amount of ambient carbon dioxide, or, at least intermixing so much that it decreases the partial pressure of carbon dioxide everywhere at the surface of the earth. It has been mentioned that the top of the atmosphere of the earth seems to have risen a few hundred meters, and a new gas, added in large amounts, to the atmosphere, can cause that!
As additions to the subject, among other things, July 12, 2004 seems to have been the date of all but unprecedented rainfall in southern New Jersey. Water is bubbling up from soil underneath, through cracks in asphalt; dams have been overflowed; and houses have been inundated up to the second floor. In the area around Lumberton, the conditions have been described as constituting a “thousand year storm”!
At about 3:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, July 13, too, water vapor in the northern hemisphere took on the configuration below. For a day that had a “thousand year storm” in New Jersey, the area west of Baja seems abnormally deficient in water vapor. The huge, black spot off the western coast of Mexico represents an area apparently extremely low in water vapor in the mid to upper atmosphere. The size and degree of dryness is something I have never seen before, and it’s made all the more unusual in that it’s completely over water! This may represent an area in which the new substance being introduced has managed to completely push the water out.
If others have seen cases of strange growth in plants, it can be important, in what it indicates about the atmosphere.
Julian Penrod
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 07-14-2004] |
| |
|
|
m3th0d
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 188
Location: Rijeka, Croatia |
|
Wed Jul 14, 2004 3:33 pm
|
|
|
Garden is a hobby of mine as well. I haven't noticed anything weird about the vegetables; I only plant parsley/carrots/celery and such anyway, but I'm surprised at flowers and fruit growth. A fruit tree that should bear ripe fruit in august was ready in june!
It did not produce as much as it could/usually does. Also an abnormal quantity of leaves dried out quickly after flowering - this summer is not nearly as dry as the last one so I'm surprised.
Also the flowers - ones that should be flowering in august are already finnished flowering now.
------------------
'Eric Cartman : Why can't societies just live in peace?'
--+Peace&Method+-- |
| |
|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
|
Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:20 am
|
|
|
Its funny that you brought this up, i was just discussing this very topic with a freind today. What we have noticed is that most fruit trees hardly give any fruit....if any at all! I've lived in the SF bay area my entire life and never seen such a shortage before. The only thing i see is lemon trees that are producing,and a few orange trees.The oranges are very dry though almost like they arent getting enough water? |
| |
|
|
julianpenrod
Joined: 07 Mar 2002
Posts: 303
Location: west caldwell, new jersey, united states |
| further comments on strange behavior in plants
Sun Jul 25, 2004 3:40 am
|
|
|
Julian Penrod
4 Fairfield Avenue
West Caldwell, New Jersey 07006
(973) 220-1601
julianpenrod@comcast.net
July 24, 2004
To all:
Since the last post I placed on here, out of at least 100 tomatoes, ranging from an inch in diameter, to those at least 2 pounds in weight, only five turned at least partly red, and that is only about one tomato for every three vines. None were larger than about an inch. Only five cucumbers have matured in that time, which is less than one for every vine. But there don't seem to be any others even growing on the vines! Bees and butterflies visit the blossoms, and, a couple of days later, they wither. In a couple of cases, a bud of a fruit may begin to form, but, when they're less than a quarter the size of a gherkin, in general, they disappear! Native spearmint are flourishing, and a small patch of strawberries has grown to a large number of plants, but they haven't shown any berries, either! No fruit has appeared on the cantaloupe vines, either, but the basil plants are growing very well, and flowering! Honeysuckle have spread widely and are flowering, but a native collection of Morning Glory vines has not spread as far as it has, and, so far, only one blossom has appeared. We have shamrocks, this year, and I don’t remember seeing them here, before.
It’s mentioned, by m3th0d, who seems to live in Croatia, that fruit trees there seem to be ready months early, although they don’t seem to be producing as much as they usually do, and that “an abnormal quantity of leaves dried out quickly after flowering”, even though the summer “is not nearly as dry” as previously. In response, emfx13, from California, observed that, there, “most fruit trees hardly give any fruit”. Of all the time they spent in the Bay Area, emfx13 says, they have “never seen such a shortage before”. They comment that only lemon trees are producing and some orange trees, but the oranges are very dry, “almost like they aren’t getting enough water”.
With respect to what m3th0d says, this year, Europe seems to be experiencing weather as utterly abnormal as last year’s. There are, apparently, both record highs and record lows, below zero, in many parts of the continent! In New Jersey, I have noticed that leaves are already falling from a number of trees, and in some cases, entire sections of trees will be brown, while the rest of the tree is still vibrant green!
In fact, absolutely atypical weather is still to be seen all along the Eastern Seaboard of the United States. Last week, a number of places in New Jersey were said to have received “a season’s worth of rain in one storm”. During the rains of Friday, July 23, as much as 7 inches were recorded in some spots, and the smallest amount of rain that fell in New Jersey seems to have been about 2 inches! A meteorologist said the storms forming all along the East Coast, and moving northward along a front there, in fact, was a “winter pattern”, and completely unusual for this time of year!
With respect to fruit, on Friday, July 16, we got a lemon, to have with some fish. Cutting it open, we were startled to see how sickly and unappetizing it looked. The picture is shown below.
It didn’t taste strange, and didn’t have a bad reaction, but we have never seen a lemon that looked like this before!
With respect to emfx13’s observations about weather on the East Coast, especially the fact that oranges there seemed not to have absorbed much water, the apparently anomalous area of dryness in the upper atmosphere off the Pacific Coast seems still to be there!
The picture below is during the hours after midnight, on Friday, July 16. The size of the area seems little different from before, but it seems to have stretched across the ocean towards Hawaii.
The next picture is from the hours just after midnight on Saturday, July 17. The region of dryness seems to have reached Hawaii.
On Sunday, July 18, and Monday, July 19, the region seemed to be intruded by a tongue of moist air from the south. However, the eastern portion of the region seemed to expand to cover the coast of California.
At about noon on Saturday, July 24, the picture below was to be seen. The region seems as utterly dry as it was, before, but, now, it seems to have engulfed California!
I mentioned that a substance seems to have been introduced into the atmosphere to take the place of water, in forming meteorological patterns. This material can, apparently, persist as a vapor in the air and readily turn to a liquid, but it is not water, and may be the reason for the dry region to the west of California. The substance may be filling the atmosphere there, acting like water in that way, but it is not reacting to satellite imaging, so that the area is completely black! This may have been happening to California for some time, now, this substance falling from the sky, mixed in with water, but denying plants like oranges of water! This may be the reason emfx13 has seen many oranges that taste anomalously dry!
Julian Penrod |
| |
|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
|
Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:52 am
|
|
|
Really good observations julian. If you need any additional information on this subject / my observations, feel free to contact me. |
| |
|
|
julianpenrod
Joined: 07 Mar 2002
Posts: 303
Location: west caldwell, new jersey, united states |
| a purported "dead zone" along the Gulf Coast
Sat Aug 07, 2004 4:15 am
|
|
|
Julian Penrod
4 Fairfield Avenue
West Caldwell, New Jersey 07006
(973) 220-1601
julianpenrod@comcast.net
August 5, 2004
To all:
Truth is an all-over thing. To be sure, it helps an assertion to find information that backs up a point, but, more than that, it is critical to find such cases, since a truthful statement would cover a wide range of matters.
I have mentioned that it seems likely that an alien substance has been introduced, in huge amounts, into the atmosphere, to take the place of water in weather causation, so as to produce meteorological manifestations, such as hurricanes, more easily, and in a wider range of circumstances.
I also said that the plants in our garden have fared very poorly, this year. This has been backed up by agreements from elsewhere. For that matter, even the Star Ledger seemed to feel it necessary to address tomato diseases, but not, as far as I have seen, other plant ailments. This seems to have been mirrored by actual problems in our tomatoes.
I considered the possibility that, somehow, the gas balance in the atmosphere had been affected, by this new substance, so that there is not enough carbon dioxide for plants to grow properly, but other facts entered.
One of these is that the air has seemed particularly humid, for at least several weeks, now. But it can be that this "humid" feeling is not due to water!
As I pointed out, last year, the introduction of the new substance into the air seems to have "squeezed" the water out! Among other things, even on mildly humid feeling days or nights, even modestly cool surfaces still developed huge amounts of condensation! This isn't happening now, though. The nights are very humid, and the nights are not particularly warm, but I do not see any condensation! The water may have been all squeezed out, or almost all squeezed out!
An apparently good indicator of this is our own water tap.
We receive water from a connection to the city main, that goes underneath an asphalt parking lot. On hot, sunny days, in the past, the asphalt would get hot, and transfer its heat to the water in the soil underneath. Water has a high thermal inertia, which means it keeps its heat content, for a long time. This is one thing that mediates winter temperatures in the areas near the poles. The heat in the water in the soil would transfer to the water in our pipes, heating them up. In the past, I would get water, even from the cold water tap, that would be almost scalding, during the summer! This new material, however, in order to be more meteorologically reactive than water likely has a much lower thermal inertia. That means it would lose its heat content more easily. Once delivered in huge amounts to the soil, by rain, it could cause soil not to retain significant heat.
On particularly hot days, this year, I have not felt anything more than, at best, tepid water coming from the cold water tap!
The soil does not seem to be holding its heat.
This, too, can be something that might be affecting plants, keeping them from growing well.
Another aspect of this form of “humidity” seems also to come from the nature of the substance apparently causing it. Because this material has to be more reactive than water, it seems to act more quickly and readily than water. Normal humidity often would take a couple of days to build up. We have been noticing that, at one part of the day, the air can seem dry, but, as little as a half an hour later, the “humidity” can already be significant!
And this faux humidity seems even more draining of moisture. In air saturated with real water, some condensation, likely, could occur, in the body, maintaining at least a degree of hydration. As water is lost during faux humidity, though, there seems nothing in the air to resupply it to the body, so the body can dehydrate faster than before, and thirst can build up more than before! During July, we had to keep two air conditioners running non-stop, to fight the sticky feeling in the air! Normally, we could do with only one air conditioner, during the day, and keep the windows open, at night!
But another point comes up, in connection with the "faux humidity" we are experiencing.
A primary means for plants to grow is the transport of nutrients up the stalk. But that is accomplished, very largely, by the respiration of water from the leaves. As water evaporates into the atmosphere, it creates a slight vacuum, and this can help draw moisture and nutrients up the plant's body. Some will say only capillary action is involved, but this may not be very useful in moving more than the capillary substance, namely the water. To carry heavy substances like nutrients, another force may be needed. If you stop the respiring of water to the air, you can, apparently, significantly starve a plant of nutrition!
Humidity, or "faux humidity", both seem to represent one thing, namely, the air being so filled with a gaseous substance that it can't accept any more water. If the air is filled with a material that literally "squeezed water out", and, now, is not letting it back in, the transport of nutrients can be greatly diminished. Even if the substance in the soil is the same as that in the air, the "humidity" can prevent its travelling up the plant stalk, in great amounts.
A malnourished plant could grow very slowly, and, also, be less resistant to disease!
The sluggish growth of various plants, and the apparent emphasis on diseases in plants seem very much explained by this!
Another point has come up, that seems related to the presence of this alien material in the air.
The article, www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/environment.deadzone.reut/index.html, details claims of a huge oxygen poor stretch of water, along the Gulf Coast of the United States, from the mouth of the Mississippi River, westward, to Texas. It’s blamed on nitrate rich soil, from farmers up the Mississippi, being washed down to the Gulf, causing algal blooms in the Gulf waters, which are considered responsible for using up all the oxygen in the water. It’s being termed an annual event, now. Fish and other aquatic creatures that can escape the area, it is said, flee, and this is claimed responsible for sharks, in desperation, attacking humans along the shores of Texas.
Among other things, though, if you look at the “dead zone” delineated on the map provided in the CNN article, you will see that it matches closely an area on recent weather.unisys.com maps of the region, showing places strangely empty of water vapor. One such map is shown below, from August 4.
A huge such area - curious for being free of water vapor, while over the Pacific Ocean - was mentioned before in this thread. The area in the Pacific is still there, and just as large. It doesn’t seem to cover California, now. I indicated this as being related, possibly, to emfx13’s statement about fruit growing badly on the West Coast. The area of diminished water vapor in the air along the Gulf Coast comes and goes, but it seems fairly frequent there.
But this is not the only eminently questionable facet of this matter. Rather than being an area of decreased oxygen in the water, the “dead zone” may, in reality, be a place where the alien substance in the atmosphere has congregated in the water. Any damage to animal populations may be due to the poisonous nature of this material, or, at least, its apparent likely proclivity to cause seaweed to grow sluggishly, also. The claims of oxygen decrease causing fish and other animals to flee, causing shark attacks, is eminently unreasonable, however, and precisely because of the claims of increased shark attacks; sharks, as large as they are, could not possibly survive in water so depleted of oxygen that small fish and swimming crabs couldn’t survive there! What may be poisoning the Gulf may, indeed, be washing into it from the Mississippi, but it seems to be the substance that is being used for weather control, washed into the soil, by rains, and brought to the Gulf by the Mississippi!
Julian Penrod |
| |
|
|
julianpenrod
Joined: 07 Mar 2002
Posts: 303
Location: west caldwell, new jersey, united states |
| yet more cases of anomalous behavior in plants
Sun Aug 15, 2004 4:31 am
|
|
|
Julian Penrod
4 Fairfield Avenue
West Caldwell, New Jersey 07006
(973) 220-1601
julianpenrod@comcast.net
August 14, 2004
To all:
Some new points come to light, apparently relating to the likelihood that a substance intended to replace water in the air has worked its way into the environment, and can be causing effects other than what it was supposed to be utilized for.
It seems obvious to a number of people that plants are behaving strangely, spreading vines and flowering, but not producing much by way of fruit. Trees in West Caldwell, New Jersey were actually shedding leaves and turning color a couple of weeks ago! There are reports, too, it seems, of trees and bushes that are desiccated brown, but in only one spot! In West Caldwell, I've seen no fewer than three trees that are brown in one spot. In fact, from East Hanover to Caldwell to Nutley to Belleville to Montclair to Roseland, about one in every three old growth deciduous trees has paper bag brown leaves in one spot. About one in three deciduous trees also seem to be acting like they would in autumn, losing leaves or having leaves turning color, but in one area alone, also!
A picture of some of the trees with anomalously brown leaves is shown below.
Interestingly, though, during a broadcast of scenes from Florida, during the approach of Hurricane Charley, they actually had a palm tree, five or six of whose fronds were actually paper bag brown, while the rest were lush green! I have never seen that before, either!
It might be suggested that, for the deciduous trees, the oldest or youngest branches might be having their leaves turn brown, but most trees would have several branches from among the first it developed, and, usually, several new branches, at any one time. This, then, does not explain why they would be developing this brownness in only one spot each!
Just by way of a question, I heard from someone that, on Wednesday, August 11, 2004, there was hail in the Bronx that was between the size of a golf ball and the size of a baseball. If there is anyone else who can confirm this, it could be helpful.
Today, Friday, August 13, 2004, www.cnn.com had an article on the "return" of a "dead zone" in the Pacific. I have already mentioned a "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico, an area supposedly abnormally free of oxygen. Because of this, it is said, fish and other animals won't be found there. I had never really heard of that dead zone before, and this is the first I have heard of a "dead zone" in the Pacific, also! This is supposed to be off the coast of Oregon. I pointed out that the "dead zone" in the Gulf Coast coincided very well with the strange areas of minimal water vapor in that area. I suggested that this area is a "dead zone" not because there is no oxygen in the water, but because the water is contaminated with abnormally large amounts of the substance being introduced into the air, to take the place of atmospheric water. If there is no life in the Gulf Coast "dead zone" it could be because they are poisoned by this substance, not because they need oxygen. It turns out that the "dead zone" in the Pacific seems to be described as being situated very close to the huge water vapor free area I mentioned as being in the Pacific Ocean, also!
Incidentally, if you look at the water vapor images for the progress of Hurricane Charley, you will be able to see the difference between actual water vapor, coming from the hurricane - which seems to be a normal, water fed form of hurricane - and the water vapor free regions which seem to be characteristic of areas contaminated by the new substance.
.Julian Penrod |
| |
|
|
DvdGStwrt
Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Posts: 41
Location: Modesto, CA USA |
|
Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:05 pm
|
|
|
First, is there a way you could divide that picture to put all the thread onto one screen? right now the most recent pics of trees has caused the thread to spread out. 
Second. Moisture (Water) as you pointed out in your Tap water issue does absorb lots of heat. Heat, as you may know, is what drives the weather engines of the world. Water Vapor is the number one cause of the green house effect. The Green house effect is what keeps us from freezing on the night side of the planet by trapping heat int he atmosphere and slowly releasing it through the night.
The Most common reported elements in the sprays are Aluminum and Barium.
Barium oxidizes rapidly, in order to have pure barium one must submerge it in petroleum oils (or an oxygen free atmosphere) So what would be present is Barium Oxide which absorbs water which chemically changes it to a hydroxide. (http://education.jlab.org/itselemental/ele056.html)
Aluminum also oxidizes rapidly - however Aluminum will only oxidize on the surface forming a protective patina which prevents further "rusting" In small enough particle Al will become Aluminum oxide. Which is the most naturally occurring form of Al (http://education.jlab.org/itselemental/ele013.html)
Aluminum is an excellent conductor of electricity, something to note if you start researching scalar weapons. So well is it at conducting electricity many wires are composed of this material over copper nowadays.
There are other things in these sprays. There is no data base yet to compare the location to the findings of contaminates from sprays, spray patterns and the like. I sorely wish there was. Weather is a local and regional phenomena, climate is as well. We can not assume that the very same mixture of compounds is being sprayed everywhere. There are different sprays being used depending on the needs of the locality it is being sprayed at. Thus there are differences.
Barium oxide is a desiccant, meaning it is used to absorb moisture in industry to keep things dry.
Now lets turn to weather, climate and "Global Warming"
We are told that due to the excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that earth's mean temperature is rising. However our neighbor one orbit out has an atmosphere mostly of Carbon dioxide. If the simple Carbon Dioxide = Green house effect were true Mars would be a very warm place. But it is not, it is a cold dry place. Dry being the key here.
Water Vapor is a big component to the Green House Effect - add to that other gasses and you get a stronger green house effect. You can either remove these gasses or remove the water.
To date there is no easy way to remove Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere. Yes, Nature Does it in forests and the oceans. There are short term "quick" absorption through plants, and then the long term absorption through shell fish which die and sink to the bottom forming lime stone which is carbon rich. other natural methods which are slow and fast relatively speaking.
The easiest method to date to remove green-house causes is to attack the water vapor content of the atmosphere. Removing some of the Green house causes will allow some heat to escape back into space.
Another interesting trick that barium does when it absorbs water is turn into "whitish" substance. White, as we all know is reflective of heat and light. If you were attempting to reduce atmospheric influx of heat you would of course try to reflect heat back into space before it got deep enough into the atmosphere to get trapped by the green house gasses.
And another trick of Barium: Remember the Pineapple discussion? Rain Water has acids in it, sulfur dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide. Barium Hydroxide reacts to acids: It will reduce the acidity of the water. One of the issues we were facing was Acid Rain. Did it just stop one day? Or is the PH being lowered in rain water and nobody talks about it?
Now what about those plants? We know that plants readily absorb what is in the soil. We all have heard that copper for hydrangeas will change their color - We fertilize plants because we want them to absorb those chemicals which will help them produce, live and thrive.
Interestingly enough enough barium salts (mind barium hydroxide is a barium salt) is said (http://www.familyjeweler.com/fortweb/BariumEPA.htm) to have the following effects:
ACUTE (SHORT-TERM) ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS Acute toxic effects may include the death of animals, birds, or fish, and death or low growth rate in plants. Acute effects are seen two to four days after animals or plants come in contact with a toxic chemical substance. Barium and its salts have moderate acute toxicity to aquatic life. Insufficient data are available to evaluate or predict the short- term effects of barium or its salts to plants, birds, or land animals.
CHRONIC (LONG-TERM) ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS Chronic toxic effects may include shortened lifespan, reproductive problems, lower fertility, and changes in appearance or behavior. Chronic effects can be seen long after first exposure(s) to a toxic chemical. Barium and its salts have moderate chronic toxicity to aquatic life. Insufficient data are available to evaluate or predict the long-term effects of barium or its salts to plants, birds, or land animals.
I am willing to bet dollars to donuts that some compound in gelatin will interact with barium in one of its forms to release acids which will have the same effect as a pineapple.
Which brought us back around to that other subject.
And what of aluminum? It is reflective, conductive of electricity and if what we know of production of Ozone in electricity holds true, than we may find that an introduction of an electric field high up in the atmosphere may create ozone where we are suffering from ozone depletion - Which may explain the "scalar" weapons use in conjunction with Chem-trails.
David |
| |
|
|
julianpenrod
Joined: 07 Mar 2002
Posts: 303
Location: west caldwell, new jersey, united states |
| yet more examples of apparently aberrant weather
Sat Aug 21, 2004 4:29 am
|
|
|
Julian Penrod
4 Fairfield Avenue
West Caldwell, New Jersey 07006
(973) 220-1601
julianpenrod@comcast.net
August 20, 2004
To all:
Evidence that weather is being produced not by water, air and heat, but by some anomalous substance introduced into the atmosphere is continuing to accumulate.
Only a few nights ago, the temperature in Tennessee was only 49 degrees.
I was told that someone said they saw hail the size of golf balls in the Bronx, on Wednesday, August 11. If anyone has more information, it could be helpful.
Turkey is being said to be undergoing the worst flooding in at least a decade.
A report, mentioned by Reuters, on Wednesday, August 18, says that winters in Europe may disappear, by 2080.
And, today, Friday, August 20, a filler piece in The Star Ledger reported that, overnight, Tower, Minnesota fell to 25 degrees. Nearby Embarrass fell to 27. These both apparently set record lows for the day. By comparison, International Falls, which refers to itself as The Nation’s Icebox, was 36 degrees! But, it turns out, even this was a record low for the spot, for the date, beating the previous record of 37 degrees, set only two years ago! To be sure, this was not presented as a page 1 item, but, to list record breaking lows, even as a filler, seems unusual.
No less than meteorologist John Bolaris, on the Monday, August 16, CBS Evening News, said that the steady flow of weather along the Eastern Seaboard is being produced by a "trough that has been in place there for more than a year and a half now"! Traditional meteorology says that weather patterns are controlled by heat from the sun, and so, have to be seasonal! There is nothing in traditional meteorology that calls for a weather system to stay in place for more than a year and a half!
And, yesterday, Thursday, August 19, Reuters released an article, "Weak El Nino Seen Affecting U.S. This Fall, Winter". In the article, they describe El Nino as "an abnormal warming of water in the Pacific Ocean every four to five years which can last up to 18 months". In the early Nineties, they were describing El Nino as occurring every couple of years, or so, yet meteorologists mentioned it promptly, every year, claiming the last one - the year before - had actually occurred a couple of years before! Now, in this article, though, they describe it as occurring every "four to five years"! Note, though, that, in the very same article, they describe the last El Nino as occurring "from May 2002 through March 2003"! Now, they are predicting one for fall this year! The timing that they ascribe to El Nino events, though seems to dispute the assertion that it was named "in honor of the Christ child as it tends to take place around the Christmas season".
In fact, though, El Nino seems to be little more than an ad hoc for meteorologists to invoke, to "explain" something they don't want to tell the truth about!
Much the same seems to be occurring on the East Coast.
They used to explain the weather of the United States with one jet stream, dipping south at the West Coast, looping down around Texas, then traveling north at the Eastern Seaboard. Now, they have three jet streams, one near Canada, one near Mexico, and one more or less where the old single stream used to be. And the jet stream across the continental United States, now, is almost never as well-behaved as it used to be depicted as being! At times, it can curve so that it almost goes along a latitude line, in spots, and, at times, there can be as many as three separate north and south loops of the stream!
On the East Coast, using El Nino to explain things away seems to have gotten stale, so, among other things, they seem to have invented the "Greenland Block" to blame the anomalous weather of the last two winters on! But that doesn't seem useful all the time, so, now, they are crediting much of the strange weather on the nameless year and half long "trough", supposedly settled on the Eastern Seaboard!
Notice, incidentally, that a year and a half is eighteen months, the same length of time meteorologists seem to be trying to ascribe to El Nino!
Another important point, though, seems to present itself.
To be sure, El Nino seems to have been referred to even before wholesale chemtrailing was seen - although there seem no major large scale references before the Eighties - but, what is described as the worst El Nino of the Twentieth Century is said to have taken place between 1997 and 1998, essentially the same time that chemtrails first began to be seen in large numbers! This seems more than a coincidence! These days, with so much chemtrailing that seems to have gone on, much of the environment may be contaminated with the substances they spew, so any marked alteration in weather, due to chemtrails, may be rare. All the weather is unlike what it was, perhaps only a quarter of a century ago, but, from one year to the next, now, the aberrant nature seems pretty much the same! But, when chemtrailing first began in earnest, evidently in 1997, the change-over from more normal weather, to the effects of the new materials in the air, was drastic! And that may have been blamed on El Nino, to avoid giving the truth out to the people!
Julian Penrod |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 12:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
