|
|
Moonstar
Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 72
|
 Sat Feb 09, 2002 9:38 pm
|
 |
|
The reason that some of these radars are not any known radar location, is that the military now has the ability to move radar into locations. They did this locally here in Maryland. They had a moveable radar they brought in, one radar at a known radar location, and a radar on a ship at sea. This way they were able to triangulate and track lear jets for pretend missiles. |
| |
|
|
Duncan Kunz
Joined: 19 Oct 2000
Posts: 582
|
|
Sun Feb 10, 2002 1:28 am
|
|
|
Moonstar, it's true that the military has the capability to move radars around, but they've been able to do that for over fifty years. With all the advances in signal processing, you can now get a hand-held, yet very sophisticated doppler radar capable of acquiring a target and determining its distance plus speed and returning it right back to the operator, who can then deal with the target.
Very often, 'dealing' with the target involves writing a large ticket to the unfortunate guy who may have pulled off the Rockville Pike exit in a hurry to catch the sale at White Flint Mall LOL!
Regards,
------------------
Duncan Kunz / duncankunz@home.com
Mesa AZ / 480-891-2525 |
| |
|
|
IZAKOVIC
Joined: 09 Jan 2001
Posts: 130
Location: Rijeka, Croatia (Europe) |
|
Sun Feb 10, 2002 10:44 am
|
|
|
quote:
if you radiate radar waves at to high an amplitude, you will get this same kind of visual "feedback" which, instead of increasing the individual returns, merely amplifies the return signal until it washes out the display. ....
.... The "inverse square" rule of electromagnetic propagation says that the strength of a signal decreases as the square of the distance traveled by the signal. .... At a certain point, the decreasing radiation falls below the "clutter" threshold, and the signal goes back to normal. If the signal is an "omni-directional radiator" (that is, it is radiating out equally in all directions), then it will reach the clutter threshold at about the same distance in a circle from the radar, and you will a circular ground clutter blob on the scope.
.... There are also things that can modify the shape of the circle (like small pockets of microclimate that might attenuate the signal at a certain point), .... .
end quote.
And if the atmosphere radar signal conductivity is enhanced by saturating it with the easily ionizable barium and magnesium compounds that radar signal itself can turn in cold plasma, process similar to that what goes on in ionosphere, then the standard weather radar signal output amplitude (power level) becoming to high goes over the clutter threshold enabling the resonance with radar system's noise that then creates radar circle for which standard weather radar imagining software cannot compensate.
Solution to this problem is that you just turn the resolution of weather integration imagining software down (in the case when the ionization of atmosphere over large area that is covered by number of weather radars occurs - this is caused by jet stream control problem that results in weather front overkill, killing all winds, and thus high concentration of airborne ionizable matter) or you just turn the output signal power of the particular weather radar down (in the case when the local chemsprayplane spray group is dumping the stuff in hurry because it is late for the NFL game).
Thanks Duncan for clearing the technical side.
Best regards
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com
|
| |
|
|
Duncan Kunz
Joined: 19 Oct 2000
Posts: 582
|
|
Sun Feb 10, 2002 9:54 pm
|
|
|
I don't think so. |
| |
|
|
looookinup
Joined: 04 Mar 2001
Posts: 17
Location: Chapel Hill, NC usa |
|
Mon Feb 11, 2002 4:56 am
|
|
|
Hi, IZAKOVIC!
I have a quick question--a little off-topic perhaps, but along the lines of your reply...
(Woke me up last nite in a cold sweat...)
If the atmosphere is saturated with sub-visible, microscopic, METALLIC particles, like barium, and aluminum, and magnesium,
AND a nuclear air-blast (or two, or three or more) happened to happen,
WOULD that be able to IRRADIATE and CONTAMINATE these particles on a long-term basis with some kind of long-term radioisotope changes, or ionizing radiation?
And these particles -- being so eminently inhalable and all -- plus able to travel vast distances along the air-ways of the world--could they lodge in the air-ways of human beings (a.k.a. citizens) and by continual irradiation to tissues, cause damage, illness, tumors and cancer?
In other words, could this 'scenario' serve some long-term, large-scale population control interests of the gov/nwo/un?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by looookinup on 02-10-2002] |
| |
|
|
looookinup
Joined: 04 Mar 2001
Posts: 17
Location: Chapel Hill, NC usa |
|
Mon Feb 11, 2002 4:57 am
|
|
|
sorry, double post
[Edited 1 times, lastly by looookinup on 02-10-2002] |
| |
|
|
IZAKOVIC
Joined: 09 Jan 2001
Posts: 130
Location: Rijeka, Croatia (Europe) |
|
Fri Feb 15, 2002 11:13 pm
|
|
|
Hi Looookinup.
Barium compounds would partially absorb gamma and X rays that the blast created and emit their energy as a visible light that would in the end turn itself in to the heat leaving chemtrails unchanged. It would create quite a big flash, from horizon to horizon.
This process, together with the electromagnetic pulse, whose production, apart from the biologically lethal neutron flux, is the main reason why the atmospheric nuclear explosion would be used, would instantly ionize the barium/ magnesium soup (which component would be prevalent depends on the air pressure required for the local weather and air conductivity control) and create plasma that shall divert the propagation of the electromagnetic pulse itself and disperse its energy ducting it through the chemtrail layer in the similar manner as ionosphere does with electrically charged part of Solar radiation. Aluminum is here essential to enhance the conductivity. This could protect specially shielded electronic equipment (military) from instant destruction but all common equipment will be fused.
Radioactive products that are created by the explosion of the material of the bomb itself would spread and cover the surface making it unusable for some period of time, depending on the bomb makeup material (outer moderator) and quantity of the core plutonium used (it has a long half-life). Obviously, for shielding from structure busting bombs chemtrails are of no use.
So, all in all, there is no danger that radioactive chemtrails could be long-term health hazard if the materials they are made off is not already radioactive, like fine power of depleeated uranium that remains as a leftover of the reactor fuel processing or extraction of the weapons grade plutonium.
If the real story behind the chemtrail spraying is population control, as I think it is, then it is much easier to spray the mycoplasma, carrier of the genome-specific disease material like AIDS that is spreading silently over a long period of time and that cannot be detected before it is to late. As those that are enjoying to be really bad always indicate what they are doing by stating directly opposite, my vote goes to sub 10 micron fibers. They fit in to the lung alveoli. Mostly having the same size, aluminum and other weather/ plasma spray compounds come just as handy to plug the lungs or enter the blood, weakening the immune system so the real stuff could work better.
Because of its magnitude, the last stages of this operation is bound to become visible so the global war is needed. Someone must be blamed for the invisible, sudden biological attack that is going on for many years.
Sorry for the late reply. I did not intend to post this response until today after having read that Tom Bearden is on year-long antibiotic cure because he's got the infection in sixties and was told what he has by his friend, the medical doctor, only recently. Although he is the leading scientist in advanced physics today (got the patent for zero point energy device) he does not understand this problem of ours in the right way.
Beast regards.
IZAKOVIC http://www.deepspace4.com
|
| |
|
|
defender
Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64 |
|
Sat Feb 16, 2002 8:06 pm
|
|
|
... |
| |
|
|
defender
Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64 |
|
Wed Feb 20, 2002 7:22 am
|
|
|
Hi, a good friend sent me this today, so I'm posting it here. I know zero about this subject (EM/Microwave/Scalar), so maybe some of you can check it out. I had a great link once to something about Radar attacks, but lost track of it.
The thing about what happens tomorrow is something else. Ironically (or should I say symetrically?...synchronistically?  ) I had just gotten the following e-mail seconds after I heard in the news about a time tomorrow (Wed) that in military time will read something like 20:02/02/20/2002? or something like that? It's a very rare occurrence that happens tomorrow....I mean, today 02/20/02
quote:
I just had to get to tell you about an article at Renses tonite, right up your alley...Is about numbers for tomorrow, Wednesday..."Scientists and psychics note Mathmatical Symmetry" is title to it or fairly close. It is amazing and has impact for tomorrow and you may want to post about it as well as todays Flash Radar at Doug Pooleys Toledo Links website where article is about affects of EM/Microwave/Scalar.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by defender on 02-20-2002] |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 5:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
