|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
 Tue Jan 28, 2003 10:54 pm
|
 |
|
Yo Seek,
I answered that question in Rumpus Room Under Swamp Gas, de-debunking Just a Thought. |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Tue Jan 28, 2003 10:58 pm
|
|
|
moooovin' on over 
is there bad language...you know how sensitive I am ! |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
|
Tue Jan 28, 2003 11:32 pm
|
|
|
Here's a cute discussion with a real genius, Just a Thought.
Just a Thought
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Well swampy, I just thought I would leave this thread alone because you so elegantly proved my point, but your utter stupidity in the “pentagon animation” thread forces me to repost.
1-The plane was only traveling at 200 mph? Come on, even the rest of your chemmie buddies know that the cruising speed of an airliner is much faster than that! I am sure some of the pilots on the board will be quick to point out the error of this assumption.
2- Distance of the plane from the building in the first picture? I can’t see the front of the plane behind the card reader in the foreground. How can you?
3- Ok, Mr. video editor, please explain to the rest of us the various types of security camera system is in place at the Pentagon. Explain to us how certain security systems will split the digital capture from multiple cameras so that if you have three cameras recording on a 30fps system, each camera effectively records at only 10 fps. Now, do I know if this kind of system was in use? No I don’t, but then again neither do you.
I’m thinking your speculations regarding the video are pure drivel.
Just a Thought.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Swamp Gas
__________________________________________________________________________________________
OK JAT,
"1-The plane was only traveling at 200 mph? Come on, even the rest of your chemmie buddies know that the cruising speed of an airliner is much faster than that! I am sure some of the pilots on the board will be quick to point out the error of this assumption."
What if it was traveling at 600 mph? It would travel at 27 ft per video frame at 30fps or 810 feet per second. If the security camera was digitizing at 10 fps, a total of 20 frames would have transpired in that 2 second time, or 81 feet per frame. Nothing seen in that 2 second time, traveling a distance of approx 160-200 feet.
"2- Distance of the plane from the building in the first picture? I can’t see the front of the plane behind the card reader in the foreground. How can you?"
The last counter answered that. You would have seen it unless it is digitizing 1 frame per second.
"3- Ok, Mr. video editor, please explain to the rest of us the various types of security camera system is in place at the Pentagon. Explain to us how certain security systems will split the digital capture from multiple cameras so that if you have three cameras recording on a 30fps system, each camera effectively records at only 10 fps. Now, do I know if this kind of system was in use? No I don’t, but then again neither do you."
Stick with the Nitrous Oxide and sniffing chemicals. I advised a system in my company that digitizes up to 120 frames per second, PC based. In multiple windows, you can easily capture 30 (actually 29.97) fps. There are 24 cameras in my building, with six screens total, with 4 multiples in each if you want, all running full frame rate, with pan and zoom. Want more windows...drop frame rate to 15, and double the windows. Want even more, decrease to 320x240.
Ever use Discreet Combustion or After Effects Real Time with a Digital Voodoo 64i board with dual G4's? Thought not. I can capture real time uncompressed D1 video at 60 fps and output to 2 NTSC monitors 30 fps real time. Want multiples? Go in through the composite inputs and the frame rate capture limit goes up. CCR601 standard. 24 bit 96 khz audio sampling to boot.
Why do you sneak around rumpus room like a little worm. Come on out in the daylight and challenge us "Unwashed masses". The saying goes, "The worms and birds always go after the fruit". That's why David, Mech, Julian Penrod, myself, and others are under attack. We can match your bullying, and the people who are looking for answers don't have to be intimidated.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Just a Thought
__________________________________________________________________________________________
So what is the point, It is obvious to me that the frame rate wa less than 30 fps. who cares.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Swamp Gas
__________________________________________________________________________________________
It would have to be 1 frame a second to not show the plane. I don't know anyone who digitizes in security at such a low frame rate, especially the Pentagram. The lowest I've seen is 5 fps. The jet would have shown up at that rate. Where is it?
I'm sure you think that "Fat", "Big Nose" BinLaden video from Nov 2001 was authentic too. No scan line artifacts on an analog video?!?! Seems like somebody edited that after the fact with a clean non-linear system.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
|
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Wed Jan 29, 2003 12:23 am
|
|
|
yeah I finally made it over after picking up my monsters and cleaning some vomit up...
I like that rumpus room
the finger pic was too funny |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
|
Wed Jan 29, 2003 12:30 am
|
|
|
It think it smelled funny too |
| |
|
|
theseeker
Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim |
|
Wed Jan 29, 2003 1:11 am
|
|
|
eewwww !
 |
| |
|
|
Common_Sense
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 68
Location: UK |
|
Sun Feb 02, 2003 11:42 pm
|
|
|
How lonely some of you must be to believe all this. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:05 am
|
|
|
How IGNORANT YOU are for believing what the Bush regime controlled media whores tell you is the "truth". |
| |
|
|
emfx13
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A. |
|
Wed Feb 05, 2003 5:48 pm
|
|
|
How lonely YOU must be to hang out with us "chemmie's.Are you the only gay eskimo in your tribe? |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
|
Wed Feb 05, 2003 7:48 pm
|
|
|
Amazing how Common Scents keeps screaming for "techical facts" on chemtrails, but when you give him information on something he knows nothing about, namely video technology, he resorts to the same thing he claims "chemmies" resort to. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 6:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
