|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
 Tue Jun 03, 2003 6:01 pm
|
 |
|
Now here’s the Wolfowitz I know;
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/6/1/161354
Sunday, June 1, 2003 4:01 p.m. EDT
Wolfowitz Bombshell: Saddam Behind 9/11 Attacks and OKC Bombing
Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, said by some to be the architect of America's war on Iraq, reportedly suspects that Saddam Hussein played a significant role in the three worst terrorist attacks ever on the U.S. - the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
Discussing his soon-to-be-released Vanity Fair interview with the top Pentagon official, Sam Tanenhaus told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley on Saturday: "Wolfowitz states that there's a very strong connection, he's convinced, between Saddam and the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993. This is a very controversial idea and yet Wolfowitz embraces it and has for quite some time."
The Vanity Fair writer added, "Also I was told by a source very close to him that Wolfowitz entertains the possibility that Saddam was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995."
While a media firestorm has erupted over Wolfowitz's comments suggesting that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction played a smaller role in the decision to go to war than previously thought, Tanenhaus said the press has missed the real news in his report.
"[There are] allegations he made or that others close to him have made that, to me, are much more startling," the author told WABC's Crowley. "That's what I thought was going to be the news [coming out of this interview]."
In a transcript on the interview released by the Pentagon, Wolfowitz also indicates that he suspects Saddam was involved in the 9/11 attacks.
Asked why Iraq was at the top of the U.S.'s list when it came to taking action in the war on terror, Wolfowitz told Tanenhaus that Saddam's weapons of mass destruction played a role, but then added:
"Plus the fact, which seems to go unremarked in most places, that Saddam Hussein was the only international figure other than Osama bin Laden who praised the attacks of September 11."
Discussing the secretary's comments on MSNBC on Friday, Tanenhaus said that the reason Saddam's role in 9/11 never became the centerpiece of the Bush administration's rationale for war was because there was no consensus on the issue.
"The secretary himself has said both in his interview with me and at other times, particularly in the interview with me, that there were sharp disagreement[s] about, for instance, Saddam's involvement in other acts of terrorism," Tanenhaus explained. He cited the "World Trade Center in '93 and in 2001, September 11, and other connections with al Qaeda." |
| |
|
|
hitech_46253
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S. |
|
Tue Jun 03, 2003 6:12 pm
|
|
|
You can call a PIG a rose but it's still going to smell like and roll in its own s!@#. This is what Bush, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld are... SATANIC PIGS!
Read the previous page to discern that Bush is NO CHRISTIAN but a satanic illuminist pushing forth the goals of those who worship the satanic TALMUD.
Such are these FALSE 'JEWS' like Wolfowitz!!!
Again, REAL jews OPPOSE ZIONISM AND ISRAEL!
WMD just a convenient excuse for war, admits Wolfowitz http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=410730
US Lies about Iraq http://english.pravda.ru/world/20/91/368/10158_wolfowitz.html
|
| |
|
|
hitech_46253
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S. |
|
Tue Jun 03, 2003 8:29 pm
|
|
|
Nat Hentoff
100th Civil Liberties Safe Zone!
Hawaii Is the First State to Defy Ashcroft
May 30th, 2003 1:30 PM
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0323/hentoff.php
On May 6, the commissioners of Broward County,
Florida, in a unanimous vote, passed the 100th local
resolution in the United States proclaiming "a civil
liberties safe zone."
These resolutions are directed at the Bush-Ashcroft
war on the Bill of Rights. However, the undeterred
Attorney General is planning to introduce in Congress
USA Patriot Act II, which would much more radically
reduce individual liberties in the holy name of
national security.
I use "holy" in reference to what John Ashcroft
proclaimed on May 1, the National Day of Prayer.
During a four-hour prayer service on Capitol Hill, he
declared that "it is faith and prayer that are the
sources of this nation's strength."
However, just as God is not cited in the Constitution,
a rapidly growing number of Americans are insisting
that neither God nor Ashcroft guarantees our freedoms
in the Bill of Rights. These patriots believe, as
Thomas Jefferson said, that the people "are the only
sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
In the spirit of Jefferson, on the same day that
Broward County became part of the Resistance, it was
joined by San Mateo, Marin, and Sausalito counties,
all in California. On April 25, Hawaii's legislature
passed the first statewide resolution to preserve and
protect the Bill of Rights. Alaska followed on May 22.
On May 29, Philadelphia became the 116th town or city
to pass one of these resolutions.
According to Nancy Talanian, director of the original
Bill of Rights Defense Committee in Northampton,
Massachusetts—where this grassroots renewal of
constitutional democracy started—the term civil
liberties zone means "a locale whose local government
has passed a resolution declaring its commitment to
protect the civil liberties of its residents."
Talanian is a longtime invaluable source of news of
the Resistance for this column. Through the Bill of
Rights Defense Committee's Web site (bordc.org),
organizing tools and texts of resolutions already
passed are continually available to communities that
want to mount the ramparts.
"It took a year," Talanian points out, "for the first
50 locales to pass resolutions; the next 50 took just
two months. A movement that started in progressive
communities now includes many more mainstream
communities, including Tucson and Flagstaff, Arizona;
Dillon and Missoula, Montana; Blount County,
Tennessee; and Minneapolis, Minnesota."
On National Public Radio's On the Media (April 29),
Talanian was asked how she got involved in this
awakening of the citizenry to realize that they can
actually do something to defend themselves against a
national government that is making up the rule of
constitutional law as it goes along.
"I had worked to help end apartheid," Nancy said, "and
I had done work to help bring democracy to Nigeria.
When I heard terms like 'military tribunals,' it was
reminiscent of what happened to Ken Saro-Wiwa and the
Ogoni activists who were hanged by the Nigerian
military dictatorship.
"And when I heard about detentions without charges,
without trial, it was reminiscent of how the apartheid
government of South Africa treated the African people
who were fighting for their freedom, and I felt this
was not my country if this was the direction that [the
United States] was going in. I had to take action."
The thrust of the Bill of Rights Defense Committees
around the country is—as Nancy Talanian emphasizes—to
"ensure that there is a debate. There was no debate
back in October of 2001, even in Congress [when the
USA Patriot Act was rammed through]. Also, we hope we
can have an impact on making sure there's a national
debate before Patriot II—the Domestic Security
Enhancement Act—is voted on by Congress."
>From what I can find out, Ashcroft's plan may be not
to introduce Patriot II as a whole, but rather to slip
sections of it into bills dealing with national
security. Fortunately, the ACLU's Washington staff and
other civil liberties organizations keep a very close
watch on bills the Justice Department can use to set
more land mines for the Constitution.
But it is important to realize that the more than 100
civil-liberties-zone resolutions around the country
include a requirement—sent to each of the federal
legislators representing that community—that those
members of Congress actively work to repeal laws and
combat executive orders that violate the civil
liberties enumerated in the Bill of Rights. I would
also suggest messages of support to those members of
Congress who already are demanding of Ashcroft, the
FBI, the CIA, the Homeland Security Department, and
others in the ever expanding web of surveillance that
they tell us precisely how they are implementing these
expanding threats to individual liberties.
Among the current, increasingly impatient watchdogs in
Congress are senators Russ Feingold and Patrick Leahy
(but not Charles Schumer or Hillary Clinton). And in
the House, John Conyers, Jerrold Nadler, James
Sensenbrenner, Dennis Kucinich, Barney Frank, Bernie
Sanders, Bobby Scott, and District of Columbia
delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton. This is a partial
list, and I welcome the names of other unintimidated
congressional patriots.
Worth attention is the following section of the State
of Hawaii's resolution reminding members of Congress
and other Americans of the Japanese-American
internment camps ordered by President Franklin Delano
Roosevelt and confirmed by the United States Supreme
Court:
"The residents of Hawaii during World War II
experienced firsthand the dangers of unbalanced
pursuit of security without appropriate checks and
balances for the protection of basic liberties."
And now, the resolution continues, "the citizens of
Hawaii are concerned that the actions of the Attorney
General of the United States and the United States
Justice Department pose significant threats to
Constitutional protections."
That resolution should have added to the list of
despoilers of our liberties President George W. Bush,
who has enthusiastically approved all this legislation
and has told John Ashcroft that he is doing a
"fabulous job."
In the 2004 presidential campaign, already well under
way, Bush should be continually held accountable for
violating his oath to protect the Constitution, very
much including the Bill of Rights. But who is the
Democratic presidential candidate to demand that? |
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:13 pm
|
|
|
Larry...I just proved you a damn liar (heck that's not too hard) and you are so Crazy you don't even know it. Again, insanity is when you can't distinguish your own delusions from reality. Wofowitz did not say what you said he did. The article takes him out of context. Furthermore, I don't believe that interview in Vanity Fair is even out yet.
Bush is a Satanist because he didn't immediately have the Washington Monument destroyed? Is this what you're saying Larry? LOL...Did I mention you were a nut case? Do I even need to point that out? Or is it self evident at this point?
And that brings us to the stupid comment of the day…
quote:
Such are these FALSE 'JEWS' like Wolfowitz!!!
Again, REAL jews OPPOSE ZIONISM AND ISRAEL!
“Real Jews” opposing Zionism and Israel is sorta like Americans opposing freedom and the United States…. Don’t ya think? And this sentence according to whose gospel?
Are you taking stupid pills again, Crazy Larry...or are you just this way naturally?
|
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:50 am
|
|
|
SAVED FROM THE ASHES!!! |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Fri Jun 10, 2005 1:44 am
|
|
|
Police tazer a 22 year old woman at a routine traffic stop.
The Aug. 6, 2004 incident began as a normal traffic stop but took an ominous turn when the driver refused to get out of her SUV. It ended with a Boynton Beach Police officer hitting the 22-year-old woman twice with his Taser during her arrest.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/video/taser_video3a.html
POLICE STATE AMERICA FOLKS...
LAND OF THE SLAVE....HOME OF THE FEE |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
|
Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:01 am
|
|
|
I saw that!!!!!! 
Big tough guys picking on a BABY"
Look, there are good cops and there are PIGS!!!
What amzaed me is some of the forum answers from people....
"She deserved it"
"You obey the police if you live in our country"
"I enjoyed watching her get tasered"
We are here, NOT approaching a Police State.
Those two rednecks should be tasered.
_________________
Heard it from a pilot who spoke real gooooood! |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:16 am
|
|
|
Remember Swamp....
Its for the "HOMELAND"
These predatory, psychotic, jackbooted NAZI PUKES should be THROWN IN JAIL!!! |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
| Rush Guitarist Tasered in guess where?...........Florida
Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:18 pm
|
|
|
Kangaroo Court Results
In 6-Times Tasered
Rush Guitarist
"I thought I could accept the fact that I was Tasered six times,
twice while lying face down in a growing pool of my own blood,
and so severely that it burned bloody holes in my back."
From The Rush Website
Rush News
6-16-5
Alex Lifeson Vs. Ritz-Carlton: Although Alex Lifeson and his son Justin accepted a plea agreement in which they will serve no jail time on charges related to their scuffle with Collier County Florida sheriff's deputies at The Ritz-Carlton, Naples, on New Year's Eve 2003, the battle is not over. Less than two weeks following the plea, Lifeson and son filed a suit against the Ritz-Carlton, its security director and three sheriff's deputies seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages for injuries, pain and suffering, mental anguish and the costs of their defense to the charges.
----
* Alex's Official Statement: "In like a lion, out like a lamb. These words appeared in a Naples Daily News editorial on April 27, describing the outcome of the criminal charges against my family and myself. After fifteen months of living in fear and anxiety, and the enormous physical and emotional toll that it took from all of us, the prosecution's case began to crumble as the truth emerged and witnesses came forward to expose the behavior of these Collier County Sheriff's Deputies and certain employees of the Ritz Carlton, a resort hotel reputed to be one of the finest in the world. As that part of this ordeal came to a close, I thought to myself that more than anything, I wanted to get my life back on track.
I thought I could accept the fact that I was punched in the face so hard it ripped the cartilage from my nose, fracturing the bone and shattering my septum. I thought I could accept the incredibly painful nasal surgery and weeks of recovery, and the discomfort I feel every night when I go to sleep. I thought I could accept the fact that I was Tasered six times, twice while lying face down in a growing pool of my own blood, and so severely that it burned bloody holes in my back. I thought I could accept watching my son get electrocuted numerous times as well, and erase the memory of his screams of pain and terror. I thought I could accept being imprisoned for two days without a phone call for over fourteen hours. I thought I could accept the innuendo of those who don't know me and believed I was just some spoiled, drunken rock star. I thought I could accept watching my daughter-in-law, through a crack in the prison door, as tears streamed down her face because she was unlawfully jailed and separated from her two months old son. I thought I could accept the deep depression my wife, the woman I love without measure and who shares my soul, struggled through for months, fearing for her husband and son -- what was I thinking? Out like a lamb.
All of that for nothing. All because of the bitterness of a few Ritz Carlton hotel employees on the most festive night of the year and their incredibly discourteous, arrogant and aggressive behavior of which I had never experienced in thirty years of travel. All because of three confrontational, intimidating, enraged deputies who wouldn't even consider dialogue, who were so quick to reach for their Tasers and handcuffs when no crime was committed. All because of a prosecutors' office blind to the reality of instances of excessive force by police and the horrendous destruction of innocent lives forever changedwhat were they thinking? In like a lion. The legal action we are embarking on now will hopefully bring attention to the fact that people cannot and should not be treated this way. I was fortunate to have the resources and will to fight to the end, but there are many who don't and they will forever suffer from the forced compromise of an unfair plea bargain or the threat of sentencing guidelines that demand imprisonment, that hang over one's head like the sword of Damocles. If some good is to come of this, then let it be that the actions of a tiny minority of aggressive, Taser wielding police officers don't tarnish the reputation of the vast majority of officers who proudly serve their communities with honor and sacrifice.
I sincerely believe they deserve our utmost respect, but respect is something that must be earned and not demanded with a closed fist or an electrifying weaponthat's what I'm thinking." - Alex Lifeson, Rush.com, June 10, 2005
For the full history of this case visit
http://www.2112.net/powerwindows/NewsAlexAtRitz.htm
_________________
Heard it from a pilot who spoke real gooooood! |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:35 pm
|
|
|
F'ing PIGS.
http://www.bloodytux.com/ |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 7:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
