|
|
hitech_46253
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S. |
COINTELPRO - Function of 'debunkies' in this forum
 Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:13 pm
|
 |
|
Some people on this forum aren't just 'stupid'... well.. some are absolutely RETARDED. But some promoting the govt' agenda are part of THIS:
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/cointel.htm
about FBI/CIA activities and other related subjects. This would include the COINTELPRO Papers (FBI's secret wars against dissent), Operation Chaos (massive domestic covert surveillance), Operation Mockingbird (CIA's subversion of the Free Press), and the 1976 Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, etc.
"The FBI COINTELPRO program was initiated in 1956. Its purpose, as described later by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, was "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" of those individuals and organizations whose ideas or goals he opposed. Tactics included: falsely labelling individuals as informants; infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups; initiating politically motivated IRS investigations; carrying out burglaries of offices and unlawful wiretaps; and disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and groups."
If you understand the meaning of the tactic "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" you will understand that the person who is most likely of being a Fed, is the one who involves patriots in activities that have no effect on the New World Order, or which will destroy the credibility of the patriots. The New World Order would like to convince people that we are all a bunch of paranoid nuts, because we are trying to warn people about THEM.
Check the link. I'm being hounded by a couple of them now.
|
| |
|
|
msu94
Joined: 16 Feb 2002
Posts: 207
Location: Tucson, AZ |
|
Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:57 pm
|
|
|
I bet you would know all about the FBI and COINTELPRO, Agent Lawson 
How is life at Langley?
|
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:02 pm
|
|
|
If Crazy Larry is an example of what the CIA is hiring these days, then we are all screwed. No, I think the reality is that Larry couldn't get a job at Burger King. |
| |
|
|
hitech_46253
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S. |
|
Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:10 pm
|
|
|
I've documented John Stadtmiller at GCN and others as pushing DISINFO CIA types like Stew Webb who pushes ridiculous topics like "a MILLION Chinese Robotoids" to make REAL topics like the emerging POLICE STATE belittled.
Agent MSU??? Yeah Right. Come here to Indiana where I live and say that PUNK! |
| |
|
|
msu94
Joined: 16 Feb 2002
Posts: 207
Location: Tucson, AZ |
|
Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:26 pm
|
|
|
Sure thing, Special Agent Lawson. |
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:50 pm
|
|
|
Was BK agent Crazy Larry threatening violence? By GW, I think he was! That sounds like justification for banning to me!
Personally, I think if Crazy Larry met ME in person, he'd think twice about any threats. I'm a big BAD cookie monster... |
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Tue Jun 24, 2003 10:28 pm
|
|
|
I’ve been doing a background check on Special agent Larry Lawson, and I’m finding some interesting stuff;
http://www.avoiceforchildren.com/news/2003/jan/TESTIMONY_OLC_1-17-03.htm
quote:
THESE NAMED AGENTS FULLY KNOW that on November 5, 1996, in the court of judge GREG WEST, the state "case" was exposed to be lies and fraud and the work of a black market child selling operation of STATE AGENT SHIRLEY BAEZ, SOSCF CASEWORKERS LARRY LAWSON, TIM IRMEN, SILVERTON POLICEMAN GARY ROBERTSON and many others were found to be GUILTY by the jury.
|
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 1:56 am
|
|
|
Hmmmm....I'm learning so much.
Apparently Larry Lawson was a case worker in Oregon, before he moved to Indianapolis, IN, after having been convicted in a child porn sting....It was then as a result of intensive plea bargaining, he became a disinfo agent for the CIA internet division, posing as a crazy nutcase conspiracy theorist, in order to track down other pedophiles like himself. After all...he knows them best.
How am I doing, Larry? Getting warmer? Uncomfortably close to the truth maybe? It'll ease your conscience if you just come clean. |
| |
|
|
shatoga
Joined: 23 Nov 2002
Posts: 1291
|
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:19 am
|
|
|
FW,
No threat intended.
Would love to have you spout your Nazi nonsense to my face also!
No violence or illegal action.
Just like to see you try to keep a straight face while you spout those lies.
Moderators, administrators:
Stupid malicious attempts to post personal information about another member is a great reason to ban the group posting as FW.
How about it moderators and administrators?
Attempts to post personal information about another member.
That is malice aforethought.
|
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:53 am
|
|
|
What personal information did I post, $#@#!?
I'm trying to make a point...Out of sheer curiosity, let's see if you or Crazy Larry gets what that point is before I'm banned by the mods, Ok?
Oh and believe me, I'd keep a straight face. These are more than my beliefs $#@#!. They are rational and logical concepts based on what historically works. They are reality. You'd probably be the first to loose your cool and get angry though. I have a lot of experience talking to liberals, and one thing you'll notice is that they are always humorless, hateful and angry. They are the first to spout insults, the first to commit acts of violence and vandalism in their demonstrations, while conservatives, are usually very much and control, and use humor to make points....
I think if I met you in person, you'd be the first to loose it….in fact, I’d place a lot of money on that bet!  |
| |
|
|
shatoga
Joined: 23 Nov 2002
Posts: 1291
|
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 8:16 am
|
|
|
Not one single word:
rational and logical from whatever is posting as FW.
FW stupidly posted:
>I think if I met you in person, you'd be the first to loose it….in fact, I’d place a lot of money on that bet! <
Place your money!
I've never lost a 'physical confrontation'
to less than five people.
No piss ant chicken hawk has ever stood up to me yet.
You are intending to mentally bring a butter knife to a gunfight if you intend a personal debate.
The total lack of visiting links and responding to honest questions proves you are an internet candyass!
Cannot even answer one honest question:
Again
What do you neo-cons have against native born Americans?
|
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 8:31 am
|
|
|
Oh yeah...that wasn't an angry response, $#@#!. No...you aren't loosing it..Yeah keep telling yourself that.
Big ass, couch potatoes have a way of saying a lot of things on the internet that they wouldn't say in person. Seriously, I doubt you would be much of a physical threat in person as you are implying here....Oh I forgot, you are NOT threatening physical violence. I was confused there for a second.
As to your question;
quote:
What do you neo-cons have against native born Americans?
The question is disingenuous because it is based on faulty premises. In other words, it isn't "an honest" question as you claim. First of all, we are not "neo-cons" by your definition of "neo-con" as I've already explained on numerous threads here...So you’ve already had an honest answer in that area that you refuse to see or acknowledge.
Secondly, the assumption built into the question is that neo-cons have something against native born Americans. I wouldn't know what neo-cons think, given that I'm not a "neo-con". I'm a mainstream conservative Republican. But, if I were to speak for myself and answer the question honestly, I don't have anything against native born Americans. It's like asking you "Why do you molest little children"? The question has a faulty premise. It assumes that you molest little children, which has not been confirmed or proven.....just as assuming falsely that I am a neo-con and that I have something against native born Americans is a faulty assumption. The question was therefore rhetorical, disingenuous and does not address me. Why should I answer a question not addressed to me?
The real questions are....Will you hear an honest answer? Will you stop blaming others for that which you are guilty (such as not answering questions, for example).... |
| |
|
|
Fastwalker
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:10 am
|
|
|
Why haven't I received my gubment paycheck yet? Hmmmm...must be in the mail....All this counterintel stuff I'm doing really ain't paying worth a warm crapola on a shingle...Maybe Mr. Big plans to give me a company Humvee as compensation..(although I'm doing my part to be as politically incorrect as possible, as per agency regs, that new Hummer just seems a bit pretentious…besides, I wasn‘t going to risk saying that "I hope Mr. Big plans to give me a hummer"). Not that there's anything wrong with that... |
| |
|
|
hitech_46253
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S. |
|
Wed Jun 25, 2003 3:38 pm
|
|
|
Well, here's more PROOF that Fartknocker is the MORON we've always known he IS!
ROTFLMAO!!! You're certainly no 'threat' to me cookie Mite!
By the way, there's more than one person who has the name "Larry Lawson" and those who BOTHER TO CHECK THEIR FACTS would find that I've ALWAYS LIVED IN INDIANA!
MORON!
|
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 7:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
