Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
LUCIFERIAN Bush Admin. Supports FAGS!!

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Conspiracy

Author Thread
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
LUCIFERIAN Bush Admin. Supports FAGS!! PostThu Jun 12, 2003 7:13 pm  Reply with quote  

NEOCONS...Kneel and worship/service your QUEER master Bush boy and his QUEER minions and PAEDOPHILE daddy and VP!

Some PHONY 'christian' this slug is!!


Who is really nuts? Psychiatric Association debates removing pedophilia as mental disorder http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200306/CUL20030611c.html
In a step critics charge could result in decriminalizing sexual contact between adults and children, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recently sponsored a symposium in which participants discussed the removal of pedophilia from an upcoming edition of the psychiatric manual of mental disorders.
(That's because top level SATANISTS like Bush Sr., Dick Cheney and others ARE PAEDOPHILES!!!)


John Ashcroft rules homosexuals can have gay pride celebrations at Justice Department http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41417-2003Jun10.html
The Department of Justice yesterday said it will allow employees to hold events marking Gay Pride Month on its property, a statement that comes days after reports that it had banned such events

Justice to Let Staff Honor Gay Pride
Department Says Office Events Were Not Barred


By Brian Faler
Special to The Washington Post
Wednesday, June 11, 2003; Page A33


The Department of Justice yesterday said it will allow employees to hold events marking Gay Pride Month on its property, a statement that comes days after reports that it had banned such events.

Gay activists said last week the department told them they could not hold Gay Pride Month observances -- the first time, they said, that a federal agency had disallowed them. That prompted criticism from gay rights groups and some lawmakers, who called the decision discriminatory.

Justice Department officials did not return calls Friday about the issue. But spokesman Mark Corallo said yesterday it had never banned the events and attributed the imbroglio to "miscommunication."

He said the department had told DOJ Pride, a group that supports its gay employees, that Justice could not sponsor any events without a presidential proclamation. The Bush administration has declined to issue a statement honoring Gay Pride Month.

But, Corallo said, the department told the group it could still hold its event; it just wouldn't be sponsored by Justice. DOJ Pride had planned a ceremony next week in the Justice Department's main auditorium to honor two lawyers who have defended gay rights.

"They were told -- very clearly -- that, like any properly constituted employees association, they could request the space, it would be granted and they could have their event," he said. "It just would not be officially sponsored."

Corallo said he did not know why the department waited several days to clarify its position.

That did not satisfy Marina Colby, president of DOJ Pride. "I can't believe they said that," she said. "We were told we couldn't have the event at all, even if we paid for all of it."

She called the announcement a "partial reversal," but said it was still discriminatory. Colby said the department sponsors other heritage and diversity events, such as those honoring Black History Month or Hispanic employees. Last year, Justice sponsored the group's gay pride event and Deputy Attorney General Larry D. Thompson addressed the group.

Sen. Frank J. Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said yesterday he will ask for hearings on what he called "possible violations of the civil rights by the Department of Justice against their own employees."

As for DOJ Pride's awards ceremony, Colby said she did not know if the group will still hold its event in the main auditorium.


© 2003 The Washington Post Company


 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
Thermit





Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas
PostThu Jun 12, 2003 8:21 pm  Reply with quote  

Some PHONY 'christian' this slug is!!

Somehow, I don't think Jesus would be bothered by a Gay Pride event. Jesus tried to teach people to love one another, even one's enemies. Do you imagine that Bush would be more 'Christian', if he hated gays?
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
PostThu Jun 12, 2003 8:39 pm  Reply with quote  

Gee Thermit... the Bible is real CLEAR on God's hatred for this sin. Love the sinner HATE the sin.

"A man who lies with another man as a woman is an ABOMINATION to the Lord."

And I'm making a sharp point here with regard to our "Skull and Bones" "Bohemian Grove" member president. Both organizations are LUCIFERIAN in their activities and ideology.

PAEDOHILIA is confirmed in many top so-called world leaders and Bush Sr. and Cheney are DIRECTLY implicated in trial material hushed up for National Security resons in TN transcripts. This ties to MK-Ultra CIA ABUSE that many have experienced.

Documented: http://www.trance-formation.com and elsewhere.

Bush Jr. nor Sr. are ANY KIND of 'christian' Thermit! There actions in setting up DEATH CAMPS, POLICE STATE and war upon war should tell any rational person that!

Or do you think Jesus would find that 'loving'????
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
Thermit





Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas
PostThu Jun 12, 2003 9:08 pm  Reply with quote  

There's not much point in talking about religion or what we think God thinks, just avoid the hateful slurs, as in your thread title. Thanks.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
PostFri Jun 13, 2003 2:45 pm  Reply with quote  

Does everybody remember when Ashcrack spent THOUSANDS covering up the naked lady statues there in the 'justice' dept.????

This guy has SERIOUS 'issues.'

'Gay Pride' Reversal at Justice Dept Gives Groups Half-a-Loaf
By Lawrence Morahan
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
June 12, 2003

(CNSNews.com) - Under pressure from homosexual activist groups and at least two Democratic senators, Attorney General John Ashcroft apparently reversed a decision not to allow U.S. Department of Justice employees to stage events marking "Gay Pride Month" at agency headquarters.

Employees may hold "gay pride" events at the agency this year, but they will not be officially sponsored by the department, an official said.

The change has left both liberals and conservatives giving some credit to Ashcroft but also expressing concerns that the policy still needs revision.

Members of DOJ Pride, a homosexual advocacy group within the agency, said the department denied the group permission to hold an event on June 18 at the agency. This was the first refusal of a federal agency to host a "Gay Pride Month" event, they said.

Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the Department of Justice, denied the agency had reversed its position. The confusion was the result of a "miscommunication" between the agency and the group, he said.

"The group was not told that they couldn't hold the event. Any properly constituted employee association can request the use of the facilities for their groups' events," Corallo said.

"However, the government is not obliged to sponsor nor pay for these events. As it turns out, DOJ Pride was the only employee association that had received sponsorship from the department over the last two years," he said.

The decision to allow "gay pride" events at the agency is drawing fire from family policy groups. Concerned Women for America said the government should not get involved with "gay pride business."

"We're happy that Attorney General Ashcroft is moving in the right direction, and at least the Department of Justice is not officially endorsing this gay pride event," said Peter LaBarbera, a senior policy analyst at CWA's Culture and Family Institute.

"We wish they'd adhered to what was originally reported, that there would be no event at all, but at least it's not endorsed like it was last year," he said.

LaBarbera added that it's not something taxpayers should be funding because most taxpayers probably disagree with the idea of celebrating homosexuality.

Homosexual advocacy groups cautiously welcomed the decision.

"We're pleased that the Department of Justice has lived up to the commitment made by John Ashcroft during his Senate testimony that he would allow gay and lesbian employees to be treated equally, and we hope they take an extra step and offer them the same exact treatment as the other employee associations in regard to sponsorship of the event," said Patrick Guerriero, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans.

Winnie Stachelberg, political director of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement, she welcomed "that the DOJ has reversed their decision of the all-out ban on the on-site gay pride event.

"However, the new policy is still a step backward as DOJ Pride is being treated differently than it was in the past, and unequally from other agency groups who have the full sponsorship of the department. This policy marginalizes the department's GLBT [gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender] employees," she said.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said Tuesday he would ask for hearings on what he called possible violations of Department of Justice employees' civil rights.

In a June 10 letter to Ashcroft, Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) said he was concerned about the department refusing DOJ Pride the use of its facilities.

"Congress and the American people expect the attorney general to ensure equal treatment and equal protection for all Americans. I urge you to reverse the department's decision immediately and allow DOJ Pride to use department facilities to hold meetings and events," Feingold said.

DOJ Pride had planned a ceremony for next Wednesday in the department's main auditorium to honor two lawyers who specialize in legal issues relating to homosexuality.

E-mail a news tip to Lawrence Morahan.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostFri Jun 13, 2003 5:15 pm  Reply with quote  

I'm curious larry...you claim to be a Christian...yet you seem to fight tooth and nail everything revelation is said to predict...

are you trying to push back the 2nd coming ?

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
PostFri Jun 13, 2003 6:16 pm  Reply with quote  

"WOE unto those who LONG FOR the day of the Lord." SEEKER!!

This is a point that's been made. These brain dead NEOCONs actually WANT Armageddon!

In so doing, they're working WITH SATANIC / ZIONISTS and satanic PRESIDENTs and VP's!!

Evil calls good evil and evil good in these 'last days.'

It's like Thermit posting here saying it's futile to talk about religion???!!

Give me a break! He's REAL clear on the issue of HOMOSEXUALITY! The only place it gets vague is in PER-VERSION Bibles rewritten of late.

IT IS NOT LOVING to allow more homosexuals to think thier actions are OK while they dig their own eternal graves!

We are admonished to put stumbling blocks before evil to SLOW this agenda. To hope to avert or DELAY 'judgment' NOT BRING IT ON!!!

God has promised to cast into outer darkness those who hold that attitude!

And GOOD RIDDANCE!! God IS love, but he's also JUDGMENT. And His Word will be FINAL!

His ORIGINAL UNALTERED WORD!
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
PostMon Jun 16, 2003 3:33 pm  Reply with quote  

BUSH JR., MIX HIM IN WITH THE GAYS?

Posted By: TONZAL
Date: Sunday, 15 June 2003, 7:26 p.m.

>http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=32919
>
>Sherman:
>[1] sordid private life, male sex-mate he travels with(see our
>homosexual underground item), Mayor of sizeable southern town.

What does this all mean?

-------------

BUSH JR., MIX HIM IN WITH THE GAYS?

Complete story at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/06/15/MN184416.DTL

Landmark gay ruling may put Bush in bind

Sunday, June 15, 2003

Washington -- The Supreme Court will decide within the next two
weeks one of the most important cases in the history of civil
rights for lesbian and gay Americans, reigniting a battle in the
Republican Party that President Bush has delicately sought to
avoid.

At issue in Lawrence and Garner vs. Texas is a state sodomy law
that strikes the most fundamental chords within the GOP and
threatens to split two party blocs pivotal to Bush's re-election.

The case involves two gay men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner,
who were arrested Sept. 17, 1998, in their home in Harris County,
Texas, for having consensual sex after a neighbor falsely
reported a "weapons disturbance." Police entered their home,
discovered them "engaged in deviate sexual intercourse" and
jailed them under the Texas homosexual conduct statute.

A decision for the plaintiffs would -- for the first time --
guarantee equal protection for gays and lesbians under the 14th
Amendment, much as Brown vs. Board of Education did for African
Americans nearly a half-century ago. Depending on its decision,
the court could also guarantee for lesbians and gays a
constitutional right to privacy.

Gay Republicans contend that not just equality but the
decriminalization of their existence is at stake. Allied with
Republican moderates who want to reach out to socially tolerant
swing voters, they contend that the case concerns violations of
core American values of privacy and equal protection.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
ChemCaptain





Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States
PostMon Jun 16, 2003 4:03 pm  Reply with quote  

Okay.. We get that you are anti-gay... Jesus, enough!

Find a new name to call Bush in every thread.
 View user's profile Send private message
Fastwalker





Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 832
PostMon Jun 16, 2003 9:41 pm  Reply with quote  

Like I say, we need to keep Crazy Larry away from sharp objects, for his own safety and that of society.
 View user's profile Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostMon Jun 16, 2003 11:29 pm  Reply with quote  

These brain dead NEOCONs actually WANT Armageddon!

how do you bring about something that will happen anyway ?

armageddon is a good thing larry...unless your not confortable in your faith...or are a bad person...

well larry...
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
ChemCaptain





Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Location: United States
PostTue Jun 17, 2003 4:00 am  Reply with quote  

I disagree.. That armegeddon is a good thing.
 View user's profile Send private message
hitech_46253





Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 499
Location: Indianapolis, IN U.S.
PostTue Jun 17, 2003 10:16 pm  Reply with quote  

Like daddy Bush, Cheney and so many other CORRUPTED so-called world wierd leaders, this SICKNESS is prevalent at the top of the heap. They say cream rises to the top, well so does the SCUM and that's what all these creeps ARE!

Portugal reeling over child sex abuse scandal
The opposition socialists, until now ahead of Portugal's ruling conservative Popular Social Democrats in opinion polls, are in shock after learning some of their senior MPs may be involved in scandal over sex abuse of boys in a state orphanage. http://www.prisonplanet.com/061603sexrings.html

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
Ludolph





Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Posts: 1
Location: New York
PostFri Jun 20, 2003 10:46 am  Reply with quote  

No, young man. The source of all homosexuality is not discussed in the old, but only in the New Tetstament. Paul sais it is a punishmeht given by God to sinners. Women become lesbian acoording to Paul because of the sins of their husbands, men, becuase of their own sind. So the Bible sias God hates a sin he creates himself. Homoseuals argue that it would nbe blasphemy therefore to resist the punishment of God and their homosexuality. Paul sais too that homosexuals also deserve punishmeht for their received punishmeht (death penalty). If you think that is strange, it was none other then Nitzsche who asked: an eternal Paul, who could stand an eternal Paul?
quote:
Originally posted by hitech_46253:
Gee Thermit... the Bible is real CLEAR on God's hatred for this sin. Love the sinner HATE the sin.

"A man who lies with another man as a woman is an ABOMINATION to the Lord."

And I'm making a sharp point here with regard to our "Skull and Bones" "Bohemian Grove" member president. Both organizations are LUCIFERIAN in their activities and ideology.

PAEDOHILIA is confirmed in many top so-called world leaders and Bush Sr. and Cheney are DIRECTLY implicated in trial material hushed up for National Security resons in TN transcripts. This ties to MK-Ultra CIA ABUSE that many have experienced.

Documented: http://www.trance-formation.com and elsewhere.

Bush Jr. nor Sr. are ANY KIND of 'christian' Thermit! There actions in setting up DEATH CAMPS, POLICE STATE and war upon war should tell any rational person that!

Or do you think Jesus would find that 'loving'????



 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
the professor





Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 1164
Location: heartland USA
PostSat Jun 21, 2003 5:16 am  Reply with quote  

QUOTE
No, young man. The source of all homosexuality is not discussed in the old, but only in the New Tetstament. Paul sais it is a punishmeht given by God to sinners. Women become lesbian acoording to Paul because of the sins of their husbands, men, becuase of their own sind. So the Bible sias God hates a sin he creates himself. Homoseuals argue that it would nbe blasphemy therefore to resist the punishment of God and their homosexuality. Paul sais too that homosexuals also deserve punishmeht for their received punishmeht (death penalty). If you think that is strange, it was none other then Nitzsche who asked: an eternal Paul, who could stand an eternal Paul?


I think you are way off, says is spelled says btw, you easily forget the lessons from sodom and gomorrah.

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page
1, 2  Next

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 7:43 am


  Display posts from previous:      



Conspiracy List | Arcade Webmaster | Escape Games


© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum