|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
 Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:09 am
|
 |
|
Then you shouldn't have taken part in the election, the professor, should you? The idea that a general election won by popular vote is in any way communistic, in the politcal sense, is laughably absurd.
No one on that council was 'appointed', or bought there way in with anyone else's money or influence. I'll spare everyone any tired analogy between that and the current leadership of the US. If a chemtrail site governed by chemtrail activists, researchers and observers elected by people concerned with chemtrails isn't democratic enough for you, then go elsewhere.
No is going to get banned by the council unless they violate some pretty simple and straightforward rules.
If, on the other hand, someone decides that this forum is just another bathroom wall to scribble their crudely rendered profanities across, then there stay is liable to be a short one, I suspect. |
| |
|
|
the professor
Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 1164
Location: heartland USA |
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:41 am
|
|
|
QUOTE
If, on the other hand, someone decides that this forum is just another bathroom wall to scribble their crudely rendered profanities across, then there stay is liable to be a short one, I suspect
or if you disagree with 70% of the over paranoid patrons of this site, this has been common among you guys who think your doing a service by adding to false misconceptions. The recent bannings were done plainly to squelch opposing veiws and to say your democratic in this respect is what is truly laughable. I've sat and watched people here say they're constitution believing super patriots but yet have no clue to how our system works, I've watched many here claim to be fighters and defenders of life (this def can be broad) but hate anybody who is prolife I've read posts that were obvious lies and watched how it was gobbled up and bitterly defended by the ill logic. Some claim this site is an alternative, but to what? the norm or mainstream just dosn't cut it anymore I guess, oh but wait the evil government or should I just say Bush is scapegoat for everything, nevermind anybody taking personal responsibility, and if the NWO exists (which to a degree does in my opinion) how come no one blames the others involved like the tri lateral commision, the U.N., Rockafellers, the banking system and so forth. And no I don't work for the FBI |
| |
|
|
shatoga
Joined: 23 Nov 2002
Posts: 1291
|
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 5:12 am
|
|
|
A lot of posters who might be mainstream at FreeRepublic are dubunkers here.
I wonder why?
Not partisan viewpoints?
After all they are the same people who saw conspiracies up the ying-yang when Clintonn was president.
What has changed?
All conspiracies magically went away when herr Bush was appointed?
Chemtrails are an observable fact.
anyone posting here who denies the obvious has another agenda....
[Edited 2 times, lastly by shatoga on 09-12-2003] |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 5:33 am
|
|
|
quote:
The recent bannings were done plainly to squelch opposing veiws and to say your democratic in this respect is what is truly laughable
I dislike repeating myself, and this should be plainly obvious to everyone else, but let me point out the bleeding obvious one.. last.. time...
No one can be banned for expressing an 'opposing view' (whatever that means). The only way to get banned is by violating forum rules. Stay between the lines and you won't have a problem.
This website is not government (public) property, it's private property and the people that own it, administer it, and use it have made the decision on the direction this site is going to take. And If you're going to badmouth "70% percent" of the people here, then maybe you're in the wrong place (unless you're just playing games and looking for broadband shoving matches to distract yourself with, in which case you're definately lost).
A big change? Sure. But that's the way it's going to be and I'm sure not wasting any more of my own ever-dwindling time debating something that is no longer up for debate.
And yes, I mean that in the larger sense, as well as the administrative. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 5:37 am
|
|
|
PROFESSOR QUOTE:
Some claim this site is an alternative, but to what? the norm or mainstream just dosn't cut it anymore I guess, oh but wait the evil government or should I just say Bush is scapegoat for everything, nevermind anybody taking personal responsibility, and if the NWO exists (which to a degree does in my opinion) how come no one blames the others involved like the tri lateral commision, the U.N., Rockafellers, the banking system and so forth. And no I don't work for the FBI.""
UHHH...Professor..
On this site EVERYWHERE are articles posted abot the UN, TC, Federal reserve, Rockafellers, CFR, WTO, IMF..AD INFINITUM.
Who are you trying to fool?
Abd by the way.
Bush and Clinton are EQUALLY commited to the NWO.
People here are banned for not following the forum rules..CLEARLY STATED.
After all..it is THERMITS board.
Can't deal with the rules?
Leave.
|
| |
|
|
the professor
Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 1164
Location: heartland USA |
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:24 am
|
|
|
Can't take it when your proven wrong can't ya? didn't think you could. |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:31 am
|
|
|
Just where did you "prove me wrong" about in YOUR eyes? Be specific.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 09-13-2003] |
| |
|
|
graeme
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 171
Location: Sebastopol, CA, USA |
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 7:05 am
|
|
|
I'm probably going to get bashed for this, but I'd like to toss my two cents on the table: it's easy when you're in charge to make things how you want them. That's what Bush & Co. are doing, that's what Clinton & Co. did, and that's what the "activists" are doing here (referring to previous analogies). I'm gonna turn into a deluded dingbat if all I got is the gaiacomm/Jim Phelps channel. I prefer to have someone make me think real hard about what I believe and why I believe it. I don't care much for some of the folks who've been banned from here, but they sure made me examine my arguments and I think that is worth something. I suggest we all thicken our skin a bit and if someone's getting under it, take a break- I'm sure we could all find something more productive to do for awhile. Of course, I haven't been around here much this summer and don't know all that's transpired, so maybe my two cents are only worth one. |
| |
|
|
Chem11
Joined: 21 Apr 2001
Posts: 1386
|
|
Sat Sep 13, 2003 8:03 am
|
|
|
Hi Graeme. My name's Chem. How ya' doing? I post here occasionally and I'm on the Council of Nine.
I hope you don't mind if I take the liberty of re-posting something that I (and Mech, also on the Co9) have posted several times already on this thread. I guess you must have missed it somehow...
No one can be banned for expressing an 'opposing view'. The only way to get banned is by violating forum rules.
I'm going to be saying it in my sleep pretty soon...
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Chem11 on 09-13-2003] |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 11:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
